The main reason for this is that "Film Fortnightly" has been a highly professional magazine since its inception. Pen & Fun & Pavilion www.biquge.info its sales are very low, selling only more than 10,000 copies per issue, and it has few readers, far less than those entertainment magazines that know how to cater to readers.

And their editors and writers are also relatively professional filmmakers, and not everyone can understand their articles. Therefore, the films selected by this group of professional filmmakers are naturally literary films with relatively high style. Because of the high and low number, there is a lack of public base.

And many movies with a high box office and the public's preference have failed to win awards because they don't meet their tastes, so the Academy Awards ceremonies have been criticized in recent years, and most of the reasons are attributed to these editors.

Many film companies and filmmakers also criticized the Academy Awards ceremony, thinking that their selection was really unreasonable. It's obviously a very popular movie, a very popular filmmaker, but it turns out that he can't win an award. On the contrary, some literary films that few people watch, and some actors that few people know, have repeatedly won trophies.

For example, in the previous sessions, the Academy Awards have always been more left-wing films launched by film companies, such as Fang Yuping's "Father and Son Love", "Half of the People", Xu Anhua's "Running to the Angry Sea", and Yan Hao's "The Year of Flowing Water", all won the Best Director Award and Best Film Award that year.

But in fact, the strength of leftist film companies in the Hong Kong film industry is far inferior to that of companies such as Shaw Brothers, Golden Harvest, New Arts City, and Tianxia Pictures. Therefore, seeing their frequent awards, Shaw Brothers, Golden Harvest, and New Art City are of course dissatisfied.

Because winning the award not only represents honor, but also represents unlimited business opportunities. A film that wins the Best Film Award can sell millions more for the copyright of overseas ports. This is a naked pecuniary interest, and no one is not blushing.

The main reason for this is that "Film Fortnightly" has been a highly professional magazine since its inception. It sold very little, selling just over 10,000 copies per issue, and had a small readership, far less able to cater to its readers than those entertainment magazines.

And their editors and writers are also relatively professional filmmakers, and not everyone can understand their articles. Therefore, the films selected by this group of professional filmmakers are naturally literary films with relatively high style. Because of the high and low number, there is a lack of public base.

And many movies with a high box office and the public's preference have failed to win awards because they don't meet their tastes, so the Academy Awards ceremonies have been criticized in recent years, and most of the reasons are attributed to these editors.

Many film companies and filmmakers also criticized the Academy Awards ceremony, thinking that their selection was really unreasonable. It's obviously a very popular movie, a very popular filmmaker, but it turns out that he can't win an award. On the contrary, some literary films that few people watch, and some actors that few people know, have repeatedly won trophies.

For example, in the previous sessions, the Academy Awards have always been more left-wing films launched by film companies, such as Fang Yuping's "Father and Son Love", "Half of the People", Xu Anhua's "Running to the Angry Sea", and Yan Hao's "The Year of Flowing Water", all won the Best Director Award and Best Film Award that year.

But in fact, the strength of leftist film companies in the Hong Kong film industry is far inferior to that of companies such as Shaw Brothers, Golden Harvest, New Arts City, and Tianxia Pictures. Therefore, seeing their frequent awards, Shaw Brothers, Golden Harvest, and New Art City are of course dissatisfied.

Because winning the award not only represents honor, but also represents unlimited business opportunities. A film that wins the Best Film Award can sell millions more for the copyright of overseas ports. This is a naked pecuniary interest, and no one is not blushing.

The main reason for this is that "Film Fortnightly" has been a highly professional magazine since its inception. It sold very little, selling just over 10,000 copies per issue, and had a small readership, far less able to cater to its readers than those entertainment magazines.

And their editors and writers are also relatively professional filmmakers, and not everyone can understand their articles. Therefore, the films selected by this group of professional filmmakers are naturally literary films with relatively high style. Because of the high and low number, there is a lack of public base.

And many movies with a high box office and the public's preference have failed to win awards because they don't meet their tastes, so the Academy Awards ceremonies have been criticized in recent years, and most of the reasons are attributed to these editors.

Many film companies and filmmakers also criticized the Academy Awards ceremony, thinking that their selection was really unreasonable. It's obviously a very popular movie, a very popular filmmaker, but it turns out that he can't win an award. On the contrary, some literary films that few people watch, and some actors that few people know, have repeatedly won trophies.

For example, in the previous sessions, the Academy Awards have always been more left-wing films launched by film companies, such as Fang Yuping's "Father and Son Love", "Half of the People", Xu Anhua's "Running to the Angry Sea", and Yan Hao's "The Year of Flowing Water", all won the Best Director Award and Best Film Award that year.

But in fact, the strength of leftist film companies in the Hong Kong film industry is far inferior to that of companies such as Shaw Brothers, Golden Harvest, New Arts City, and Tianxia Pictures. Therefore, seeing their frequent awards, Shaw Brothers, Golden Harvest, and New Art City are of course dissatisfied.

Because winning the award not only represents honor, but also represents unlimited business opportunities. A film that wins the Best Film Award can sell millions more for the copyright of overseas ports. This is a naked pecuniary interest, and no one is not blushing.

The main reason for this is that "Film Fortnightly" has been a highly professional magazine since its inception. It sold very little, selling just over 10,000 copies per issue, and had a small readership, far less able to cater to its readers than those entertainment magazines.

And their editors and writers are also relatively professional filmmakers, and not everyone can understand their articles. Therefore, the films selected by this group of professional filmmakers are naturally literary films with relatively high style. Because of the high and low number, there is a lack of public base.

And many movies with a high box office and the public's preference have failed to win awards because they don't meet their tastes, so the Academy Awards ceremonies have been criticized in recent years, and most of the reasons are attributed to these editors.

Many film companies and filmmakers also criticized the Academy Awards ceremony, thinking that their selection was really unreasonable. It's obviously a very popular movie, a very popular filmmaker, but it turns out that he can't win an award. On the contrary, some literary films that few people watch, and some actors that few people know, have repeatedly won trophies.

For example, in the previous sessions, the Academy Awards have always been more left-wing films launched by film companies, such as Fang Yuping's "Father and Son Love", "Half of the People", Xu Anhua's "Running to the Angry Sea", and Yan Hao's "The Year of Flowing Water", all won the Best Director Award and Best Film Award that year.

But in fact, the strength of leftist film companies in the Hong Kong film industry is far inferior to that of companies such as Shaw Brothers, Golden Harvest, New Arts City, and Tianxia Pictures. Therefore, seeing their frequent awards, Shaw Brothers, Golden Harvest, and New Art City are of course dissatisfied.

Because winning the award not only represents honor, but also represents unlimited business opportunities. A film that wins the Best Film Award can sell millions more for the copyright of overseas ports. This is a naked pecuniary interest, and no one is not blushing.

The main reason for this is that "Film Fortnightly" has been a highly professional magazine since its inception. It sold very little, selling just over 10,000 copies per issue, and had a small readership, far less able to cater to its readers than those entertainment magazines.

And their editors and writers are also relatively professional filmmakers, and not everyone can understand their articles. Therefore, the films selected by this group of professional filmmakers are naturally literary films with relatively high style. Because of the high and low number, there is a lack of public base.

And many movies with a high box office and the public's preference have failed to win awards because they don't meet their tastes, so the Academy Awards ceremonies have been criticized in recent years, and most of the reasons are attributed to these editors.

Many film companies and filmmakers also criticized the Academy Awards ceremony, thinking that their selection was really unreasonable. It's obviously a very popular movie, a very popular filmmaker, but it turns out that he can't win an award. On the contrary, some literary films that few people watch, and some actors that few people know, have repeatedly won trophies.

For example, in the previous sessions, the Academy Awards have always been more left-wing films launched by film companies, such as Fang Yuping's "Father and Son Love", "Half of the People", Xu Anhua's "Running to the Angry Sea", and Yan Hao's "The Year of Flowing Water", all won the Best Director Award and Best Film Award that year.

But in fact, the strength of leftist film companies in the Hong Kong film industry is far inferior to that of companies such as Shaw Brothers, Golden Harvest, New Arts City, and Tianxia Pictures. Therefore, seeing their frequent awards, Shaw Brothers, Golden Harvest, and New Art City are of course dissatisfied.

Because winning the award not only represents honor, but also represents unlimited business opportunities. A film that wins the Best Film Award can sell millions more for the copyright of overseas ports. This is a naked pecuniary interest, and no one is not blushing.

The main reason for this is that "Film Fortnightly" has been a highly professional magazine since its inception. It sold very little, selling just over 10,000 copies per issue, and had a small readership, far less able to cater to its readers than those entertainment magazines.

And their editors and writers are also relatively professional filmmakers, and not everyone can understand their articles. Therefore, the films selected by this group of professional filmmakers are naturally literary films with relatively high style. Because of the high and low number, there is a lack of public base.

And many movies with a high box office and the public's preference have failed to win awards because they don't meet their tastes, so the Academy Awards ceremonies have been criticized in recent years, and most of the reasons are attributed to these editors.