Recently, a lot of people have said that I have a Western knighthood in the ranks, and I don't want to say anything more.

The case of the General Codex? Official? According to the record of "Fengjue", since Emperor Yao, Emperor Shun and the Xia Dynasty, the fifth rank of lords: duke, marquis, uncle, son, and male. The Shang Dynasty placed the third class of lords: duke, marquis, uncle, childless, male second. What the facts are, there is no physical information to corroborate. The Zhou Dynasty was divided into five lords, such as duke, marquis, uncle, son, and male, all of whom were hereditary, and the fiefs were all called the state, and they exercised the right to rule in the feudal country. In the country of the princes, the titles of qing, doctor, and scholar are placed, and the state of Chu is placed in the titles of Zhigui and Zhibo. The secretary and the doctor have a fiefdom, and they can also exercise the right to rule over the fiefdom and only accept the orders of the princes.

Therefore, since Emperor Yao in ancient times, the division of titles has been like this. So, this is not Western. For example, the famous general Guan Yunchang during the Three Kingdoms period, and the official worshiped the Marquis of Hanshou Pavilion.

In the above paragraph, I quoted a book friend's post,

The prince and the boy have been around since ancient times. Later, in order to translate the Western title system and make it easier for Chinese people to understand, they used dukes, earls, etc. to refer to the corresponding titles in the West.

I hope that as a Chinese, I should understand my ancestors, the history of my own nation ~~~ Thank you for your support, after all, the online article is mixed, some things will make many readers cloudy, these things are inevitable.

The Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period also know that the titles were not all divided like this at that time~~~ If you have any opinions, just send a book review, I've been paying attention to it~~~