There are many advantages of participating in international film festivals, the most direct and fundamental one is the communication between professional filmmakers, everyone appreciates and comments on the participating film works, shares their experiences and opinions, and then allows filmmakers to make progress and film art can be developed.

Of course, if you talk about commercialization, it means that professional filmmakers express their opinions on the movie, and if the movie is excellent, they will publicize the good reputation to achieve the goal of selling the movie at a good price; Instead, learn from your failures and learn from other good work.

From any point of view, the film festival is a feast for filmmakers and film lovers. Therefore, generally speaking, after a film is exhibited, no matter whether it is good or bad, there will be many filmmakers who will express their opinions on it, or praise, or criticize, or choke it, and there will eventually be a comment trend. For those works with high attention, there will be media reviews from all over the world on the films, and the film reviews in the official house books are dense, sprinkled and lively.

But in the two days after the premiere of "Vulgar", film reviews were very scarce, which is indeed a very abnormal situation. Whether judging from the direct reaction of the audience and reporters after the premiere, or from the intensive course of the wheel interviews in the past two days, it is clear that "vulgar" should not be treated like this.

Not to mention the flood of praise, even the criticism is not much, and people seem to be reminiscing about the "vulgar" work, but they seem to be ignoring it, which is a strange feeling.

In the past two days, there have only been four film reviews of "vulgarity", which is really miserable and miserable, no wonder even the Weinstein brothers can't help it. Among these four film reviews, the most authoritative is the official house catalogue of the Cannes Film Festival.

The official house magazine gave a very high evaluation of "vulgar", and in the rating system of four out of four, it gave a high score of 3.3, which is currently only behind the 3.4 points of "Queen Margot", ranking second among the works that have been screened.

"'Vulgar' is Quentin-Tarantino's second work, and this work is undoubtedly an enhanced version of the 'Quentinian style', an iconic work that extends and carries forward the experience and exploration.

"Vulgar, in addition to the witty and witty black humor, the biggest feature of this work is undoubtedly the circular structure and multi-angle setting."

The so-called ring structure is not complicated, the film is divided into four independent parts, each paragraph is not divided into beginning and end, complementary structure, beginning and end are connected, etc., and then the timeline is broken up, so that the beginning and end of the film form a connection, completing a circular structure.

In this film, this structure is used by Quentin to allude to the recurrence of violent stories, starting with the first dialogue at the beginning and ending with the final conflict at the end of the story, forming a continuous cycle, and at the same time referring to the fact that the plot in the film is always happening in reality, and it never stops.

This new circular structure of the sword is not only a simple act of shuffling up the narrative timeline, but also echoes the different details of guò, infinitely magnifying the charm of the script from a unique perspective, so as to shoot a seemingly simple story into a witty work, which can be called a classic.

In the annular structure, the multi-angle setting also has a very special effect. In addition to observing the same event from different angles, it is more about showing that everyone's role is quietly changing in different environments and states. Derrida) also gives the film more surreal meaning - although that is not Quentin's intention, nor is it the original intention of the film.

The character of Vincent is the core that connects the whole story, and he is the absolute male protagonist in 'Vincent and Marsha's wife, appearing as a protector; But in the 'Gold Watch', Vincent becomes a 'certain thug' who shows up and is shot, and the owner of the Gold Watch doesn't even know Vincent's name.

If you look at the two stories separately, Vincent's characters are undoubtedly very different.

Maybe the murderer in this story is the savior in another story; Maybe the evil villains in this story are the heroes who save the world in another story; Maybe it's a betrayer in this story, but in another story, it's a child who takes risks for his family.

This multi-angle is undoubtedly to tell every viewer that each participant in an event has his or her own reasons and states for participating in the event, and that the roles of the same person in different times and states are also very different.

This philosophical analysis and structure gives a deeper meaning to the 'vulgar', and at the same time infinitely magnifies Quentin's personal stylization, and finally produces a masterpiece that everyone admires.

In his debut novel 'Reservoir Dogs', Quentin successfully experiments with the topic of the symbiosis of violence and philosophy, while 'Vulgarity' tries a complex and orderly pattern structure, thoroughly borrowing and imitating generously, the evil and justice of violence, the mutation and primitiveness of human nature, the cruelty and hypocrisy of society, and the use of large passages of lines through guò have become a characteristic of Quentin.

When it comes to the lines in the movie, they are actually worth scrutinizing. It seems to be a bunch of long and boring nonsense, but it seems that there is an introduction hidden in the words, and there is a subtle contradiction or echoing relationship between identity and the way and content of the conversation, which can always send unexpected surprises in the next scene and between different bridges.

The time limit, the spatial dimension, the shooting angle, the saturation of the characters and the depth of the subject all have a strong Quentin personal style. In the limited time of two days, several independent but related stories are connected in series, and the cruel life that may exist in the real world is cleanly presented, and the intertwined characters and events are arranged into an interesting series of unique sets between necessity and chance. ”

The official house catalogue of the Cannes Film Festival undoubtedly praises "vulgarity", although this film review is not long, but it is a concise and profound analysis of the film, and in three words, you can already see the "vulgar" sword-like feat.

It can be seen from the film reviews in the official house book that most people actually do not fully appreciate the excellence of "vulgar", because Quentin is undoubtedly cunning, he presents his thinking about life and understanding of the movie, and presents a lot of chatter, wordy and useless nonsense, and the audience often thinks that those dialogues are useless when watching the movie, and they don't care too much about it at all, and when they realize that those words are confirmed later in the story, they only have a vague impression in their minds.

This kind of mischievous filming technique makes many people have a strange feeling after watching "vulgar": everyone thinks this is a good movie, just like the audience in the cinema, and subconsciously gives a standing ovation at the end of the movie; But if you insist on saying what the advantages of this movie are, everyone is divided, their heads are confused, and they can't say why.

As the official house magazine says, the ring structure is actually just a trick, and the real excellence of the movie is that the arrangement of these four stories is also exquisite, and the characters of the previous story play different roles in the later stories, including the echo of the lines before and after, which is actually exquisite. Although everyone says that Quentin is a "hodgepodge", how to make it delicious is also a science, and like the Provençal chowder (ratatouille), it is not so easy to cook this dish deliciously.

Therefore, after the premiere of "vulgar", professional film critics and filmmakers have gone to the cinema again to watch this movie, they can't blindly praise or criticize like ordinary audiences, they have to say a reason.

It is precisely for this reason that in the past two days, everyone has been a little secretive when mentioning "vulgarity", everyone can clearly feel that Quentin has given everyone a huge surprise this time, and "vulgarity" has also opened a new history; But I had to calm myself down, don't blindly follow, but wait until I really understand the movie before making a statement.

Thus, this strange situation emerged.

On the one hand, there is an endless stream of "vulgar" wheel interviews, and audiences are also entering the cinema to watch the film, and the "vulgar" screenings arranged by the Cannes Film Festival are so full that they have to reduce the number of screenings of several works with poor reputation to add screenings for "vulgar"; On the other hand, the film critics hesitated, and for two days, they didn't see any famous professional film media commenting on this movie, and it was deserted.

However, this situation was soon broken, and on the afternoon of the 19th, the famous "movie manual" (cahiers. du。 EMA)" was the first to publish a film review.

France's "Cinema Handbook", Britain's "Sight & Sound" sound)", as well as the American "Film Review", these three magazines can be regarded as the most authoritative film magazines in the world, with different characteristics and different readerships, but they are undoubtedly all receiving huge attention.

Cannes is the home of the "Cinema Handbook", and their film reviews have the greatest impact on French audiences, so they are the first to publish film reviews, which also attract the attention of countless eyes.

In the rating system of four out of four, the "Film Handbook" gave a rating of 3.4 points, which is even higher than their evaluation of "Queen Margot", and it is also the highest score given by the "Film Handbook" since the opening of this year's Cannes Film Festival.

There is no doubt that the "Film Handbook" has received the highest praise, and from here, it has also kicked off the prelude to the two-day belated film review frenzy against the "vulgar", wave after wave, dizzying, and surging. (To be continued.) If you like this work, you are welcome to come to Kazakhstan to read and vote for the work to vote for the monthly ticket. Your support is the biggest motivation for me to continue creating! ）