"Q Magazine", as the most influential professional music magazine in the British Isles on the other side of the Atlantic, naturally spares no effort to pay attention to the Grammys, obviously, "Q Magazine" is also full of countless grievances for the 36th Grammys, not only because the British rock bands born in 1993, such as Goatskin Band, Shen Yun Band, and Stain Band, led British rock to the international stage again, but the result was directly ignored by the Grammys; And because of the rock feast set off in the United States, it was also humiliated by the Grammys, which made "Q Magazine" a little gloating, but also a little sympathetic.

In its professional review of the 36th Grammys, Q Magazine said, "The Grammys' efforts to glory to death have been ignored, and this may be the current state of the American pop music market today: the tide has changed dramatically, but the academic school is still conservative and unwilling to change."

Although the Irish band U2 won the award for Best Alternative Music Album, which is an important affirmation of this long-standing band, there is no doubt that the title of 'alternative music' is not suitable for the band U2, but only makes the defeated Pumpkin Band and Glory to Death seem more and more 'ridiculous' - Grammy's mockery of itself.

The Goatskin Band, Shen Yun Band, and Stain Band from the British Isles reproduced the glory and classics of the Beatles' golden age, but on the other side of the Atlantic, only one band, the Yetai Commander, was initially recognized, which was an insult to British rock and a regression for the American pop music market.

Glory to Death caught the last train of the rock 'n' roll revival in 1993, 'Lithium,' and 'Don't be upset about the past,' look。 ba。 Anger), these two songs can be called the pinnacle, giving people a vague glimpse of the pomp of punk when it came out in l977, which also made Glory to Death qualified to compete with Nirvana, but unfortunately, the truth was never treated fairly when it first came out, as it was at the beginning of the birth of rock and roll, this was the case at the beginning of the birth of punk, this was the case at the beginning of the birth of grunge, and it is the same now.

The 36th Grammys missed 'Lithium' and then 'Don't be upset about the past...... and finally missed out on Glory to Death, and history will prove that decision was a mistake. ”

This is only a review of the Grammys by Q Magazine, but there is also a part of it that mentions the attitude of Glory to Death and Hugo, which is also the most direct counterattack to the views of the Chicago Tribune.

"Glory to Death made it clear before the Grammys made it clear that they would not be there for this ceremony. Obviously, this rookie band has a more accurate positioning and cognition, and they know that the middle-aged Grammys can't give their band the corresponding recognition, so they simply rejected the Grammys from the beginning.

Perhaps, the mainstream media are fighting for glory to the death, including us, who think that the Grammys ignore glory to death and ignore rock and roll change, which is a historical mistake; But in fact, in the eyes of glory to death, they have no regrets at all, because even if such a Grammy gives an award to the band, it is not a correct recognition, but on the contrary, it is an insult - the insult to identify 'almost famous' as mainstream rock is a real blow to the band's musical style.

Glory to death lead singer Hugo Lancaster once said in an interview, 'If they can't even define our musical style,' what qualifications do they have to discuss our nominations, and what qualifications do they have to put on a musical feast?, and now, we can give that to the Grammys again. The Chicago Tribune mocked Hugo for being out of balance because he didn't win the Newcomer of the Year award, but the Q Magazine news responded unintentionally: Hugo didn't care at all! Because in Hugo's view, the Grammys didn't figure out what the music of glory to death was, so even if the Grammys presented awards, they didn't know what to do, and such an award was unacceptable, and getting it was an insult to the music of glory to death.

The response from the "Q Magazine" on the other side of the Atlantic was not violent, because they did not intend to respond to the "Chicago Tribune" at all, but the "American Weekly" report was clearly coming from its own sources, and they responded to the "New York Post", "National Inquirer" and "Chicago Tribune" in all directions.

"Hugo and Lancaster filmed a blasting scene in the crew of 'Speed of Life and Death', refused to use a stand-in, and went on the scene in person, but the explosion was a little off, and the director was overturned by the air wave, hit the wall directly, and fell into a brief coma. To make sure Lancaster didn't suffer a concussion or internal bleeding, the crew left and sent him to a nearby hospital for examination.

Lancaster's dedication and dedication have been recognized and praised by the entire 'Speed of Life and Death' crew, and they even risked their lives in order to shoot this scene well, just to be able to present a wonderful picture effect in the end, which won unanimous praise from the crew.

However, the wounded Lancaster did not receive corresponding care in the hospital, and due to the hospital's negligence, the hospital fell into chaos, although Lancaster tried his best to avoid making noise, and even deliberately avoided the crowd, but all efforts were ruined by the arrival of reporters.

In order to interview Lancaster's injuries as soon as possible, a large number of reporters did not hesitate to rush into the hospital en masse, and surrounded Lancaster, who had just completed the examination, in the inpatient department, and even ignored the patients who were resting, and conducted interviews on the spot. According to the information reported by the hospital staff and eyewitnesses, Lancaster did not clash with the reporter, but asked to change the location for the interview, but the reporter was still unyielding, and in desperation, Lancaster chose to break through the siege and took the initiative to come to a relatively secluded location, where the reporters who were chasing him surrounded him again.

Lancaster told reporters that he refused to be interviewed in the hospital, and a reporter from New York provoked: Can we understand that the crew of "Life and Death" refused to cooperate with the media? In response, Lancaster gave the strongest response, saying that the next 'Life and Death Speed' refused to accept any form of interview with this media during the publicity period.

Later, when Lancaster could not bear it anymore, he violently reprimanded the reporters at the scene, and even during the reprimand, in order to keep the hospital quiet, Lancaster had been suppressing his anger.

A resident doctor at the hospital, who did not want to be named, said that Lancaster hated the noise of the hospital staff and the pestering of reporters, and he also realized that his arrival had an impact on the peace of the hospital, and tried his best to control the situation, but unfortunately the lack of cooperation of the relevant personnel led to a farce.

However, when the news broke out, some media actually pointed the finger at Lancaster, and this kind of news report that reverses black and white is undoubtedly the greatest irony of the media's freedom of speech and pursuit of truth.

It is undoubtedly cruel and callous for Lancaster to be admitted to the hospital for examination while injured, but not to be able to enjoy the normal treatment that any ordinary person should receive. If Lancaster is really seriously injured, then the actions of these reporters and onlookers are likely to lead to uncontrollable consequences, which is beyond the bottom line of morality and must be strongly condemned; Even if Lancaster hadn't been injured, he should have received normal treatment in the hospital, and interviews with reporters and bystanders shouldn't have happened inside the hospital.

Not long ago, the news media created the heinous 'witch trial' incident on Michael and Jackson, and now they are using their freedom of speech to oppress public opinion on Hugo and Lancaster, and even affect Lancaster's right to treatment, what is the difference between this and a murderer?

The media even put the blame on Lancaster's temper, and if Lancaster's anger in order to maintain a quiet resting environment for his patients needs to be blamed, then should the culprits of the noise be imprisoned by the Los Angeles police?

If Lancaster's dedication should be blamed, if Lancaster's insistence on music should also be blamed, then what actions should artists in the film industry and music industry use to impress the public?

When the media do whatever they want under the banner of freedom of speech, is this a threat to the security of society by terrorists?"

At the end of the commentary, the "New York Post," "National Inquirer," and "Chicago Tribune" -- condemned them, and although they did not explicitly point them out, the implication between the lines was very clear, and this was obviously the most direct counterattack to them.

From a simple hospital incident to the Grammy controversy, and then to the media's ability to distort facts and turn black and white upside down, this time the war escalated very quickly, especially involving the fact that Glory to Death returned empty-handed on the Grammys, and the whole controversy burned in an instant - Obviously, there are many media that are willing to fight for glory to the death, and there is no shortage of media that are willing to uphold the authority of the Grammys.

The incident about the hospital, the discussion about the Grammys, and the concern about the "speed of life and death" have been in an uproar, but Hugo, who is the party to the incident, seems to have disappeared, just as he said to the media, and directly refused all interviews, which made the media very anxious, but fortunately, Hugo's two agents did not disappear, and they still expressed their position on behalf of Hugo at the first time.