The 47th Cannes Film Festival finally came to an end, and the jury led by American Clint Eastwood awarded the Palme d'Or to the "vulgar", which made Quentin Tarantino famous!

Media and audiences from all over the world witnessed the emergence of "vulgarity", a shocking film that changed people's fixed thinking about screenwriting, changed people's understanding of postmodern vulgar culture, and changed people's fundamental perception of independent films.

Since then, the development trajectory of films in the 90s has entered a watershed www.biquge.info the "vulgar" as the pen and fun pavilion, after which the status of independent films has become more and more important, and even become an indispensable part of the film market; Most importantly, postmodern cinema has entered the theater, and filmmakers who have received advanced technology such as videotapes, music videos, and computers have stepped onto the stage of history.

All of these qiē started with this golden palm, which is remembered by countless people!

"Vulgar" not only witnessed the rise of Quentin, Quentin, who only shot two works, became one of the first-line directors overnight, becoming the hottest independent director in the North American film market; At the same time, it also witnessed Hugo's ascent to the top!

When Hugo took over the filming of "Vulgar", people's worries were like mountains that could not be counted: only 300,000 US dollars of ultra-low salary, 8 million independent films, enough to cover up the actor's strong directorial personal style, fledgling novice director, strong Weinstein brothers producers, and a series of negative news about the crew during the filming process......

After all the details are connected, countless people are worried: whether Hugo, whose career is in a stage of rapid growth, will once again usher in a "fatal moment" fiasco and start another collapse downward curve.

Even the "Chicago Tribune" once joked, "At least this time Hugo learned to be obedient, even if the investment of 8 million is a fiasco, the loss is within the range of bearability", which is obviously a failure to determine "vulgarity".

But the curve of things is often impressive.

First of all, "Schindler's List" swept the Oscars, and Hugo won the Oscar for Best Supporting Actor in one fell swoop, and the limelight was unparalleled for a while, and even the new Oscar winner Tom Hanks was slightly inferior, because Hugo not only had excellent acting skills, but also excellent box office, and most importantly, album sales were also excellent, such an all-round artist has not appeared in Hollywood for many years.

Subsequently, the "vulgar" who was criticized by the media did not make a move, and after the shot, he became a blockbuster, winning the Palme d'Or and topping the Cannes Film Festival, snatching the Best Actor Award to push Hugo's actor career to the first peak.

Whether it is looking back on Hugo's 12-year acting career, or looking back on the two years after the Golden Raspberry Award, this is undoubtedly the first peak that Hugo climbed!" The regret of "Death Poets Society", the choke of "Smelling the Fragrance and Knowing the Woman" and "The Heroic Wind of the Yihai", and the inadequacy of "Sleepless in Seattle", the talent accumulated over the years finally ushered in a full-scale explosion in the first half of 1994, pushing this man who only turned 27 years old in November this year to the peak of his career in one fell swoop.

It can be said that the success of the "vulgar" is undoubtedly sensational!

After the Cannes Film Festival ended, the major media from all over the world talked about it for a while, but it was obvious that most of them were praised.

The British magazine "Empire" wrote a review under the headline "Tarantino shines at Cannes", in which the review mainly praised the "vulgar" film for its excellence and well-deserved award, saying that "this is an epoch-making work, and Tarantino's mixture of postmodern culture and vulgar interpretation of the script has undoubtedly given new hope to the dead film industry".

In addition, they also mentioned in the commentary, "Ge from China and Lancaster from the United States are tied for the best actor, which is also a big surprise." In particular, Lancaster's delicate but in-depth portrayal is undoubtedly the biggest highlight of the whole movie. Lancaster surprised the world at the Oscars at the end of March, and Lancaster at Cannes at the end of May proved that he was not a meteor. ”

The Italian "Cinema" magazine once criticized "vulgarity" as useless during the Cannes Film Festival, but when the award was announced, their attitude was more like a discouragement.

In the comments, "Film" devotes more than two-thirds of its space to expressing regret for the "Red of the Blue-White-Red Trilogy", not being able to rely on the same series to complete the feat of Grand Slam in one year, which is undoubtedly a fatal blow to the Italian media, and what is even more terrible is that "Red" has nothing to do in Cannes and returns empty-handed.

The Italian media also realized that their excessive pursuit and exaggeration were self-defeating, which aroused the disgust of the French media and ruined the historical prospect of "red" from a certain point of view, so the "film" also did its best to satirize the French media in the commentary, especially gloating about the final defeat of the "Queen Margot", which was enthusiastically pursued by the French, "They seem to have forgotten that the president of the jury is not French".

In this case, when "film" mentions "vulgar", the attitude is softened, and the victory of "vulgar" is more acceptable than that of "Queen Margot", "Cannes continues their admiration for Hollywood films, and once again chooses American productions." It's just that this time 'vulgar' is an unexpected but praiseworthy choice, just like the name of the movie, this is a vulgar, a vulgar story, but it plays a new trick with the film narrative pattern, which is undoubtedly a new revelation for the film industry. ”

Although it was not praised, at least it was not criticized, which is already a big step forward. Surprisingly, the "movie" is full of praise for Hugo, "In this vulgar story, Hugo Lancaster is the only discovery, and he plays a murderous riffraff in a way that makes people fall in love, reminiscent of his cousin in 'Schindler's List'." Into the wood three points, the charm is endless. ”

The French magazine "Film Manual" has always had a unique taste, and they originally admired "vulgarity", and after learning the results, they did not scold like another French professional magazine "Feature Film", but expressed their approval of the choice of Cannes this year.

They believe that "time will tell what 'vulgar' means to the world of cinema, and the jury's choice will be recognized by history", and such a concise and clear review also shows their unique vision. In their comments on the acting awards, they believe that the choice of the actress is a bad mistake and not worthy of appreciation, and the choice of the actor is also quite controversial.

"Lancaster's performance should undoubtedly be the ultimate 'only' winner, delicate but flamboyant, casual but rigorous, solemn but humorous, Lancaster's eyes are full of acting, which is amazing. Although Ge's performance is also very wonderful and worthy of praise, relatively speaking, there is no doubt that Lancaster will win the Best Actor trophy. The jury made a wrong judgment. ”

In the face of such a unique and accurate review, the "movie review" from the United States also joked, "I don't know what role Kazuo Ishiguro played in the choice of the actor; And what compromises were made within the jury to award the Palme d'Or to the 'vulgar'. ”

Obviously, the "film critics" agreed with the "film manual", and they also praised Hugo's performance.

Of course, the Chicago Tribune's comment lit up again, "Clint Eastwood brings Cannes to Palm Beach, Florida. beach)”。

There is no doubt that they were satirizing Clint as an American for the benefit of American films, and that there was some kind of deal within the jury that awarded the Palme d'Or and Best Actor to "Vulgar", because they believed that "the film that has been given so many accolades is really just a clip art of a video hall guy piecing together the plots of countless classic films, and when plagiarism becomes a masterpiece, when copying and pasting becomes a feat, this is the most epoch-making scene in Cannes."

The Chicago Tribune voted "red" instead, believing that "this great film is a victim of politics and games, fulfilling the success of 'Alive', 'Queen Margot' and 'vulgar', and also witnessing the unexpected rise of 'Scorching Sun'". They called "Red" the "only victim" of the Cannes Film Festival this time.

In fact, there are still a lot of media similar to the "Chicago Tribune" and "feature film" that are controversial about the results, after all, not everyone watched the movie in Cannes, and from the impression, "vulgar" is indeed a dark horse, and "red" is the real hit.

But on the whole, there are more media outlets that agree with and appreciate the final choice of the Palme d'Or.

In any case, with the victory of "vulgarity", the birth of Quentin Tarantino is inevitable, and Hugo's reputation as an actor has reached an unprecedented height.

Before this qiē happened, Hugo, who had returned to Los Angeles, had been completely surrounded by the influx of media, not only the media, but also the phone calls and scripts from the major film companies, which had already inundated Endeavour elite agencies. (To be continued (Dian Dian Chinese Paper) provides.) If you like this work, you are welcome to come to Kazakhstan to read it and vote for the work for a monthly ticket. Your support is the biggest motivation for me to continue creating! ）