The New York Times, one of the most influential newspapers in the United States, focused on the incident as a "rebellious scum or a personality hero......

Hugo and Lancaster righteously refused to be interviewed by reporters in the hospital, and even did not hesitate to use sharp words to have a violent conflict with reporters, which detonated the offensive and defensive war between the media and Lancaster, so is he a rebellious scum or a personality hero? Obviously, this question will have different answers in different media and different audiences. ”

It can be seen from the preface that the "New York Times" intends to conduct a comprehensive analysis this time, and the fact is also true, they have devoted a whole page to a special feature and analyzed and reported on the entire incident, which is definitely the first time in Hugo's acting career, and it can also be seen that the "New York Times" is firmly determined to protect Hugo.

"Looking back at Lancaster's behavior before 1992, there are eye-catching moments, such as the down-to-earth and outstanding talent before the 'Dead Poets Society,' such as the Yale position, and there are also suffocating moments, such as the drag racing director zhì who was hospitalized in a car accident, such as drinking and smoking. The poison problem is endless, especially in 1991, when everyone witnessed the fall of Lancaster, just like the suffocating departure of River Phoenix and James Dean, making people almost think that another genius was about to fall as fast as a meteor.

That's why people don't have confidence in Lancaster.

However, looking back at Lancaster's behavior in the past two years, it is full of moments that make people firm in their beliefs, and they are also climbing in the film industry, and they are far from drugs. The poison of the product and alcohol led the band to glory to death, and the words and deeds of justice, gentleness, sunshine, and gentlemanly manners were ...... All of this is undoubtedly a huge transformation, and we have seen first-hand how Lancaster has gone on to glory.

But Lancaster always has his own personality in his bones, and interprets it from a negative point of view, that is, he is unruly; However, to explain it from a positive point of view, it is self-insistence, which is the true face of Lancaster, principled, not compromising, young, and imposing, but not aggressive, not sharp, and not irritable.

From the thunderous blow of the 'witch trials' in the Michael and Jackson incident, to the endless positive energy in the music of glory to death, from the desperate performance in 'Schindler's List' to the insistence on the Grammy awards, Hugo's personality seems to be rebellious in the mainstream eyes, but it is the truth in the long history of history.

The same is true of this incident, when Lancaster was injured and admitted to the hospital for examination, he did not lose control because of the reporter's destruction of his **, you must know that he had just experienced an out-of-control explosion, and still did not completely rule out the danger to his life; But he was furious that the noise of reporters could lead to harassment of patients, and he even went so far as to confront all journalists.

What can the news media do in the face of such a Lancaster? slander him, discredit him, divert focus, divert anger...... It was undoubtedly another moment of shame for the news media, perhaps not as bad as the witch trials, but even more terrible than the witch trials, because the media were losing their principles, step by step, for the sake of profit, in stark contrast to Lancaster's consistent insistence.

Whether Lancaster is a rebellious scum or a personality hero, everyone should have their own answer, not to listen to the media's words at will, but to make the right judgment with their own eyes!"

While the New York Times doesn't give a straightforward answer in its report, there is no doubt that they are pushing Hugo's popularity to a whole new level in this way.

Since the public has always lacked confidence in Hugo, every time there is negative news, people's minds will have a hint of "relapse"; Then the "New York Times" will eradicate it once and for all, it wants to make people really aware of the changes that Hugo has made in the past two years, and more importantly, Hugo's important influence on the whole society as an opinion leader.

The New York Times' argument is supported by a huge body of arguments, especially since the end of last year, when every confrontation between Hugo and the journalist has been so clear that everyone has seen it, so it is not so difficult for the people to make a choice.

Of course, maybe this hospital incident is not direct enough enough to be done in one step, but the "New York Times" has already made a foreshadowing, as long as there is one more catalyst, Hugo's public image will be truly reversed, and a bright future can be expected.

The Los Angeles Times and the New York Times are arguably among the most influential media outlets in the United States, and both sides have some similar ideas. The idea of the "New York Times" actually started before the "Los Angeles Times", and Nicholas McLaen's article on whether the box office of "Life and Death" can exceed 100 million US dollars is a signal, which means that the "Los Angeles Times" is also trying to reverse the negative image of Hugo in the eyes of the public and the media.

Quantitative change causes qualitative change, and Hugo's accumulation in the past two years has had enough weight, and now the "Los Angeles Times" and "New York Times" are further promoting quantitative change, looking forward to the arrival of the catalyst, which can complete the qualitative change in one go.

This time, the "Los Angeles Times" did not focus on the "New York Times" from the same height, they locked the focus on the Grammys, and reported on it as a starting point.

"Glory to death missed the only chance in my life, the only chance to win the Grammy Newcomer of the Year, but this is not the regret of glory to death, but the regret of the Grammy, just like the Grammy missed the Nirvana band in the first place, this time the Grammy missed the glory to death. Apparently, the Grammys are stupidly missing out on the whole process of rock 'n' roll.

Standing at the height of history, this is bound to be the most fatal flaw in the long history of the Grammys: when people recall the classic era of the revival of rock and roll in the 90s, people will find that there is no place for the Grammys in the current of the full revival of rock and roll. This is a loss for the Grammys, who boast of being the most authoritative music awards show in the world.

There is no need to regret glory to death, and they will not regret it, the moment they refuse to attend the award ceremony, the 36th Grammy has nothing to do with them, it doesn't matter if they are nominated or not, it doesn't matter if they win the award or not, this is never on the list of glory to death itinerary.

So, Hugo Lancaster will not lose his rhythm because of a small Newcomer of the Year award, he will not even be furious because of an explosion accident, but he will reprimand loudly because of the noise of the reporters, this is the real Lancaster: he hates reporters.

This is not a difficult subject, and if you think back to how journalists treated Hugo, you can see that these treatments were all self-inflicted. Far from it, just talking about this incident, when the reporters lost their sense of proportion because they were in a hurry to interview Hugo, and led the chaos in the hospital, they chose to shift the blame to Hugo, and did not even mention why Hugo entered the hospital, nor did they mention how much noise they made in the hospital, let alone Hugo's concession and tolerance, but only Hugo's bad temper.

In the face of such a reporter, it is difficult for Hugo to smile. In this way, Hugo did have a bad temper.

While everyone was questioning Hugo's temper, no one noticed that Hugo was injured and hospitalized for the sake of the film's performance; While everyone is talking about Hugo's grief for missing the Grammys, no one notices that Hugo is devoting himself wholeheartedly to Yeying's performance, hoping only to dedicate a more wonderful work; While everyone is talking about how bad and undesirable Hugo's new work is, no one notices how much effort Hugo put into this film, and the entire crew is working hard to shoot a work.

Even if 'Life and Death' is a bad movie, we should pay tribute to the hard-working crew, it's their hard work, even if we curse it, we hate it, we despise it, but we can't ignore it. This is not only the attention that the film industry needs to receive, but also the attention that every job in society should receive.

What's more, none of us can predict the quality of the finished product of 'Life and Death', because we are not producers, directors, or actors, so we can only wait and wait for the film to be released before making a judgment. As for the box office of Yeying, it will be handed over to the North American market to hand over the answer. ”

The "Los Angeles Times" report is still out of the hands of Nicholas, and it can be seen that his consistent style, unique perspective and then small to big, he used a new perspective to interpret the entire hospital incident, and then directly refuted the absurd remarks of the "Chicago Tribune", and then disdained the "New York Post" and "National Inquirer".

From this point of view, the "Los Angeles Times" is indeed more high-end than the "American Weekly", and of course, Nicholas is also a cut above James Rattle.

In addition, the "Los Angeles Times" also interviewed Joseph, and under the dual effect, Nicholas's report also exerted unimaginable power.

There was a huge difference in the volume of the media of "America Weekly" and then "New York Times" and "Los Angeles Times", and this incident was quickly decided, and the dirty water of the "New York Post" still failed to achieve its goal, but made Hugo's reputation rise again this time, and the "New York Post", which had not recovered from serious injuries because of the "witch trial", suffered another blow, which was obviously not good news for them.