Although he admired Hugo, he didn't have any friendship with Hugo, and on the whole he was still an objective film critic.

In the "Chicago" review, Roger gave it a score of 75, a three-star recommendation among movies of the same genre, and amazingly, this was the highest rating among the first reviews. It seems that the duel between "Burning Years" and "" has not yet begun, and the victory and defeat have already been trended.

"Overall it's not bad, in fact, the energetic performance and heartfelt dramatization make the viewing process seem quite enjoyable." ”

In the seventy-five point evaluation, Roger objectively commented on Brad's appearance, "Compared with the '', there is some progress, but the effect is not great, similar roles and similar performances, but Brad's wild and uninhibited temperament does add a lot of points to the role, you can see his efforts, although it is not amazing, but at least it is commendable." ”

Similar to Roger is "The Rolling Stones", who has never been welcome to Hugo and has never interviewed "The Rolling Stones", who has never been interviewed to the death, and they also rated it at 75 points, "The key factor that makes this work that fills the screen with male characters shine is the actors, although (Aidan. Quinn) is tough and profound, but Brad Pitt is responsible for the audience's visual enjoyment. ”

Even the "Rolling Stones" did not give a higher score, they just stopped at seventy-five. But the comments of "Rolling Stone" point out an important factor, Aidan who plays the eldest son in the movie, because of his more difficult acting and better acting skills, but in fact, it is "sex" that really benefits. Sense bomb "Brad."

"Sex. The title "Feeling Bomb" comes from the ridicule of "", "thrilling painting, but not from the actors." The only thing that can make this work full of flair is the sex that detonates countless passions. Feeling the bomb, after this movie, we harvest Brad Pitt, and that's it. ”

The rating is 70 points, which is not high.

In fact, this is the overall trend, "Entertainment Weekly", "", "" and other major media have scores of less than 50 points, they generally believe that the story of "" is long, boring, and empty, and on the surface it seems to be an epic that reflects the background of the times, causing people to think deeply, but when people really put their energy into thinking, they find that they have found nothing. It turned out to be just a film dressed in the garb of the times.

Although people have long expected that it will not be easy to make such an epoch-making work as ""Challenge", such a result still makes countless people fall through the glasses. Don't say that compared with "", even last year's "" received more praise than "Burning Years".

In the end, the overall score of the first batch of 16 media outlets fell at 45 points, which is really unexpected. Don't say that it is against "", even lower than "", at least "Night Interview with Vampires" has a mixed reputation, but "Burning Years" is mostly criticized. "Burning Years" first fell behind in the quality competition with "vulgar", and the performance at the major award ceremonies in the future also seems to be worrying.

The theater score is relatively much better, and the evaluation of "b" is at least good, but it is not as attractive as "" to the audience. It can be seen from the audience's reaction that they are not too interested in this work, it is just "good".

But it's worth noting that an unexpected 65 percent of viewer ratings are women, which is different from the studio's estimates for a film set in a war, western farm. Clearly, Brad Pitt became the biggest attraction.

Such a result really stunned people.

Relatively speaking, hidden behind the "" word-of-mouth decline, there is a fact that no one can ignore, that is, Brad's strong rise. Even those media who criticize "Burning Years" admit that Brad shows sex in this film. The feeling of style has almost become the biggest attraction of the movie, compared to "" two years ago, Brad, who exudes a more mature "", almost instantly attracted the attention of all female audiences.

First "", then "", the two works pushed Brad's momentum to a whole new level in one fell swoop. If there were doubts about whether Brad would be able to join the race between Hugo and Tom, this question has now been answered: it is clear that Brad has already qualified for the competition.

Brad's upward momentum reminds people of Hugo at the end of 1992, when Hugo quickly rose to power with two films, "" and "".

However, when Hugo rose, he focused more on acting, although his handsome appearance is always difficult to ignore, and even easy to blur the focus, but objectively speaking, his performance has almost won the unanimous praise of professional film critics, even in the case of appearance stealing the spotlight, it still firmly occupies the attention of film critics.

And now Brad is also relying on the rapid rise of the two works, but the difference is that Brad's acting skills are lacking in praise, "" was suppressed by Tom, and some people even joked that if Hugo played Tom's role, maybe Brad would be drowned in the gorgeous and retro; "There are some praises in it, but unfortunately it is still not enough, and there are always too few breakthroughs. Overall, Brad has become the dream lover of countless women more by relying on his handsome appearance and uninhibited atmosphere.

But no matter what, the sexy, gloomy and sentimental image in "" and the dissolute and romantic and amorous image in "" can almost be said to have shaped Brad's idol image in all aspects, and the momentum is not inferior to any actor, including Hugo and Tom. This also makes Brad truly qualified to play with Tom and Hugo.

"It's been dragged down by word-of-mouth, and the subject matter itself is not the genre that can explode at the box office, nor is it the genre that relies on word-of-mouth and breakthrough changes to attract audiences to the cinema, so its performance at the box office is naturally lackluster.

In the third week of December, "", which was screened in six theaters, handed over a report card of $16,000 at the box office of a single theater and more than 100,000 at the weekend box office, which was quite disappointing and lackluster. One hundred thousand dollars, which is hardly any bright spots. Relatively speaking, "in the face of strong opponents and fierce competition, not only did not show fatigue, but also became more and more courageous!"

After a watershed in the first week of December, the box office decline of "" has not collapsed, and has always remained at a very good level - never exceeded 30% from beginning to end, more precisely, due to the contraction of the theater chain, which made the decline of the film remain at about 10% most of the time, such an excellent follow-up response is really eye-catching.

In the third week of December, in the face of the competition of "", "" took out an eleven-percent decline, and the weekend box office was 3.6 million, which completely exploded the "Burning Years" and ranked fifth on the North American weekend box office list!

The strength of the film has made many media run out of words, but it is still impossible to describe the success of this film. First "", then "", the "vulgar" that entered the smooth release period has never relaxed its vigilance, and the explosiveness and staying power are still impressive.

In this second showdown, the "" was once again blown out by the six theater chains, whether it was the single-theater box office and weekend box office in the opening weekend, or the comparison of the results in the same time period in the third week of December, "Burning Years" was unable to resist, and it can almost be said that it was defeated by "vulgarity". Especially in the "Burning Years", which only premiered in six theaters, the box office of a single theater did not show enough competitiveness, and it could only be on the same level as the "vulgar" released in 1,400 theaters, which was an absolute blow!

It's a shame for "", a real shame.

It was a complete failure at the box office, far behind in terms of word-of-mouth, and the second showdown of ""and" became a laughing stock in all directions. Perhaps the only takeaway was Brad's rise, which qualified him to take on Hugo. But is this qualification really worth celebrating?

Brad witnessed the failure of his works twice before and after, and the opponent who defeated him was actually the same:"", which means that Brad became a witness to Hugo's history while rising to the top. Just when Brad thought he had achieved enough to qualify for the call, he watched Hugo ride again.

This kind of victory only makes the happiness more bitter.

If Brad wants to get a hearty victory from Hugo, he can only wait for the next opportunity - of course, this is what all the media is looking forward to: when will the next Tom, Hugo, and Brad showdown come?

But fortunately, people seem to have gotten used to the madness of "", and this time they didn't condemn "" too much, otherwise the situation would be even more bleak than "", and the "burning years" would not be able to withstand the bombardment of the media.

But it is undeniable that the gimmick of the "second showdown" has become the biggest credit of the film industry in the distribution process, because the overwhelming media reports make people wonder: Who is the actor who can call Hugo? What kind of work is this? As a result, many curious audiences walked into the cinema, which made the box office of "" not too terrible, which is really a blessing. Offer. If you like this work, you are welcome to come to Kazakhstan to read it, and vote for the work, and vote for the monthly pass. Your support is the biggest motivation for me to continue creating! ).