The "Los Angeles Times" analyzed "vulgarity" from the perspective of actors, and gave a high score of 3.4 according to the official scoring criteria of the Cannes Film Festival, which gave a super high evaluation of Hugo's performance, which is expected, not only because the "Los Angeles Times" has always admired Hugo, but also because this point of view has also been widely recognized in Cannes.

The British authoritative professional film magazine "Sight and Listen MVP commented on Hugo's performance," from hairstyle to outfit, from language to action, from expression to eye color, Hugo injected soul into the character of Vincent, we can read the character's character from a detail in his hand, and even the experience of growing up, every gesture is a play, but there is no trace of performance at all, completely integrating the actor and the role, bursting out of jaw-dropping sparks. ”

In the view of "Seeing and Hearing", the scene in "Vulgar" that can best reflect the essence of Hugo's performance is the first twist dance, "In addition to paying tribute to classic movies and classic dances, the personality and inner activities of Vincent's character are clearly presented."

Vincent's sympathy for Mia and his jealousy of the boss Marsha clashed, and further developed with the advancement of the chat, evolving into a conflict between his good feelings for Mia and his scruples about Anton's tragic situation, and finally all the feelings burst out in a dance, and when Vincent and Mia went home, it became a tug-of-war hesitation between staying overnight or leaving decisively, and after Mia's coma, all the warmth can be found in the last conversation between the two people. Ambiguous, ambiguous. All disappears, Vincent does not respond to Mia's joke, and the two break up uneventfully.

It can be said that the development between Vincent and Mia has a very profound connotation, from Vincent's jealousy and rejection, to sympathy, and then to guò to develop into a spark, and even the possibility of misfire, and finally return to calm. The emotional development between these two characters is hidden beneath the surface of the whole story, and this unexpected surprise can only be discovered by carefully observing the performances of the two actors.

Among them, Hugo's performance undoubtedly occupies an absolutely dominant role, and it is concentrated in the scene of twisting and dancing, which is delicately and vividly presented.

At the beginning, he was restrained, retreated to defense, responded clumsily, you came and went, and finally let go of his hands and feet to carnival, and even had a tacit understanding. In this short dance, Hugo has no special expression, just uses his eyes and body movements to outline the changes in his feelings, subtle and real, concise and believable, even if he slows down and watches frame by frame, there is absolutely no problem, which makes people have to be awe-inspired!"

At the end of the commentary, "Sight and Hearing" said, "The actor who just won the Oscar for Best Supporting Actor is only 26 years old this year, but it is clear that his strength is growing at an incredible rate, and he deserves the admiration of every movie lover." ”

Not only the "Los Angeles Times" and "Sight and Hearing", but also many other media are full of praise for Hugo's performance when writing film reviews, and even many media believe that Hugo's performance can be completely dominant in Cannes and win the trophy of the actor, and this call has gradually spread in a small area.

"Vulgar" has also become a masterpiece that Hugo's performance has once again been recognized after "Schindler's List", unlike several previous works, "Vulgar" and "Schindler's List" have the same influence on the international stage that cannot be ignored, but Hugo's performance can still be recognized, which means that it has undergone more tests, which can be regarded as an unexpected gain of this trip to Cannes.

After two days of low tide, the prestige of "vulgar" began to rise, and the first four film reviews developed into 19 film reviews four days later, surpassing the popular "Queen Margot" by the French, becoming the most discussed work since the opening of the 47th Cannes Film Festival, which is also a rare sight, after all, this is the home of the French.

The "vulgarity" of the away game has become the focus of heated discussions, which also shows the craze caused by this film, and it is only at this time that the feedback of the filmmakers and the reaction of the media and the pursuit of the audience have come to the same track.

With the increasing number of media ratings, the overall rating of "vulgar" has gradually begun to fall, truly reflecting the current media perception of "vulgar" in Cannes, and in the full score of four points, the comprehensive rating of 19 media has reached 3.1 points, which can be called a highly sought-after masterpiece. But even so, it's still not the highest rating.

On the comprehensive average score table of the official venue of the Cannes Film Festival, Krzysztof and Kieślowski, who have established their status as masters of film history by relying on the "Blue, White and Red Trilogy", still show strong competitiveness in this year's hot competition, last year "Blue" won the Golden Lion Award at the Venice Film Festival, and in February this year, "White" won the Silver Bear Award at the Berlin Film Festival, and now, "Red" is leading the way with a super high average score of 3.5 after its release at the Cannes Film Festival. Becoming the strongest contender for the Palme d'Or has made many media exclaim, is it possible that Krzysztov will complete the feat of winning awards at all three major international film festivals in one year?

In addition to the "Red of the Blue, White and Red Trilogy", the competition for several other works is relatively fierce, and "Queen Margot" relies on the strong power of the local French media to occupy the current second position with a 3.3 evaluation; The third place was a bit of a surprise, not "vulgar", but "alive" that was praised by the media immediately after yesterday's premiere, with a high score of 3.2 surpassing a number of competitors in one fell swoop and becoming one of the strong contenders for the final award; "Vulgar", which scored 3.1, could only temporarily rank fourth.

In addition to these four works, Russia's "scorching sun" (burnt. by。 the。 Sun)", France's "Dear Diary (dear. Diary)" also has very good reviews, and the most important thing is that the Cannes Film Festival is still three days away, and it is still impossible to predict what wonderful works will appear after that. This average score ranking may change at that time.

It can be seen that this year's Cannes Film Festival can definitely be called a collection of good films, and the competition is extremely fierce.

"Vulgar" has not been able to express its absolute dominance in the praise of the media, which is also a feature of the festival: there are so many classics that you never know if there will be a work that will surprise film history tomorrow.

Although "vulgar" has not been able to claim the king in media ratings, on the one hand, it is also because the number of "vulgar" film reviews far exceeds that of competitors, and a certain kind of Cheng dù has also lowered the average score; On the other hand, because of the away game, the most sought after "red" is an Italian work, and "Queen Margot" is a French work, relatively speaking, from China. The "live" of the country. and "vulgarity" from the United States are naturally at a disadvantage.

The most important point is that the theorem of "the big hit must die" is often very effective at the Cannes Film Festival, due to the particularity of the jury selection system, the media score does not have absolute reference value, so the trend of the final award is still confusing.

Of course, it is undeniable that there are many people who don't like "vulgarity".

As Roger Ebert said in his film review, the "vulgar" sword novelty and boldness are undoubtedly a double-edged sword, and those who like it are highly admired, and those who dislike it will be extremely despised.

"Quentin Tarantino, who is the writer and director, seems to have been emphasizing his own style and wanting to add more personal influences to the film, which leads to certain parts of the film - especially when it comes to bloody violence and homosexuality." Sex. Strong. The content of the rape brings a strong sense of discomfort, as if it is directly attacking those public figures in society who are afraid of losing their reputation, hoping to bring sword intent and novelty from the bridge of offending these 'public figures', but the result is a fierce nausea reaction.

Maybe it's not kind. Tribe. Works that are strongly morally condemned, such as discrimination or the Holocaust, must also be criticized for their themes and ideas. ”

Not only the "feature films", but also the Italian magazine "Fiim", which was to Italy what the "handbook of cinema" was to France, was the soil for the birth of neorealism after the war.

"'Vulgar' is a chaotic splicing of countless violent and bloody scenes, except for the novelty of the film's narrative structure, the whole film is just like the name of the work, just the vulgarity hidden in the corner of the second-hand bookstore, recording the unbearable, vulgar, and inferior. The boring text of the stream, without knowing what to do, is lackluster. ”

These two professional magazines are not optimistic about "vulgarity", and they criticize it as useless, but the "feature film" praises "Queen Margot", and the "movie" gives absolute praise to "red".

Of course, the most important thing is that Europe itself is the field of art films, and compared with films like "Vulgar", which are full of black humor and use movies as a means of entertainment, it is obvious that "Alive", a work with a strong sense of life and deep social significance, is more in line with the aesthetic standards of European media.

Cinema is an art form that some people like, some people hate it, and anyone has the right to say about a film - whether it's good or bad, so it's not surprising that "vulgar" negative reviews are not surprising. In addition to the professional media, "vulgarity" has also become the hottest topic at the Cannes Film Festival, and many filmmakers will also be mentioned in interviews, and they will naturally be able to express their opinions. (To be continued.) If you like this work, you are welcome to come to Kazakhstan to read and vote for the work to vote for the monthly ticket. Your support is the biggest motivation for me to continue creating! ）