After the resurgence of the 505 'fierce' debate and sit-in demonstrations, the "Schindler's List" incident suspected of glorifying the Nazis was pushed to a new high. In fact, the reason why this incident has become a hot topic in society is certainly not because of the activity of extremist Jewish groups, but because of the social and political changes in the United States represented by the Jews, which has triggered heated discussions from all sides.

However, there are those who support the extremist Jewish group, and there are naturally those who oppose it, and this has led to a continuous explosion of public opinion in the whole society like a volcanic eruption.

Frank Frank of the Department of Sociology at Harvard University. "It is true that many Nazis were heinous demons that needed to be humanely destroyed, but a large part of them were forced by the war, by the Nazis, and by the environment of the whole era, just like in concentration camps, some Jews became Nazi minions in order to survive, and managed and even persecuted their own compatriots, which is a truth." Therefore, in the movie, Schindler said that war can call out the darkest part of people's hearts, and the background of the whole war has brewed one tragedy after another.

Leaving aside the real A'mon' and Goss in history, the Goss presented in the movie is only real, not beautified. Goss represents the ordinary people in the context of the whole war, and his inner struggles and contradictions are the conflicts that any normal person would have, in fact, such conflicts have happened to Steyn, Schindler, and the Jews who became the minions of the Nazis. It's just that everyone's choice is different, and Goss chooses to use blood to vent his inner pain.

The movie does not glorify Goss, on the contrary, Goss still chooses to kill at the end of the contradiction, which also proves that Goss chose to go down this path by himself. Maybe the Goss in the movie is not as cold-blooded as the real Goss in history, but there is no doubt that both are demons. Therefore, when Goss was finally hanged, the audience did not regret it, but calmly, even cheerfully, which is the proof.

As for the so-called 'beautification', it is actually just a kind of exploration of human 'nature' by the director, which belongs to the category of art and cannot be generalized. Just as in life, we don't say that a serial killer is merciful just because he chooses to use a pistol instead of cutting his veins when he kills; Nor will it be because of one suck. When the poisoner helps an old 'milk' and 'milk' cross the road, he thinks he is good. The same is true for Goss. On the contrary, the director's discussion of Goss, which may not correspond to the real historical figures, but it conforms to the entire historical context, which is the most important. ”

Not only Frank, but also the influence of "Schindler's List" has apparently traveled across the Atlantic to the other side of the Atlantic, and has also caused a whirlwind on the European continent, from the University of Leeds (UY) in the United Kingdom. of。 LEEDS) and the University of 'Bo' Lanwarsaw (UY. of。 Warsaw's famous sociologist Zigmuan also expressed his support for Steven Spielberg, who wrote a paper to elaborate on it.

"Historical and psychological studies of the Holocaust show that the executioners of the massacre were mostly normal people, and there is no evidence that could explain the Holocaust as a crime committed by a natural criminal, a sadist, a 'spirit' or other morally deficient individual. In general, the cruel 'sex' of human beings has very little to do with the individual 'sex' of the executor, but it has very close to the social structure that regards power and obedience as the norm. Fundamentally, the social 'sexual' factor of cruelty is much greater than the individual's 'sexual' personality factor, and in a social situation where moral pressure is absent rather than the legitimization of human 'sexuality', more individuals tend to be cruel.

The most shocking thing about the Holocaust may not be that the fate of being slaughtered may also fall on us, but that we may also commit massacre; It was possible for us to do so in the past, and it is still possible for us to do so now if the right conditions are right.

A'mon' Gos's execution of the massacre came from obedience, but also from the general trend of war, and he was just trying to survive in the whole cruel war environment. As for the cold-bloodedness and cruelty that Goss expresses, it is the result of the dark side of human 'sexuality' catalyzed by war.

On the other hand, Goss will produce contradictions and conflicts, that is, the independent thinking of the individual in the social context, which has a certain inevitability, even if he is a cold-blooded animal, but he is still an individual with the ability to think, he will still think: what is the reason for his own doing. Especially when his thoughts are shocked, for example, when he falls in love with a Jewish 'maid', this kind of thinking becomes more and more 'intense'.

There is no doubt that the portrayal of Goss in the movie is correct, because this is the inevitable result of the whole era under the background, and the director focuses on the struggle of human 'sex' and cruelty in the war on the 'color' of Goss, which also reflects the director's attitude towards the whole war: people are always small in front of the war machine, and the tragedy of Goss is the tragedy of the entire era. Schindler awakens human 'sex', while Goss is crushed by the cruelty of society.

In a system where rationality and morality are at odds with morality, it is easy for the majority of people to ignore their own moral responsibilities and choose the principles of legitimate interest and self-preservation, and to put self-preservation above moral responsibilities is not predestined in any case, and there are always people who choose the latter, even if the number is small. This shows that evil is not omnipotent, and that submission or resistance is, in the final analysis, the result of one's choice.

Under the elegance of Nazi tyranny, many people lost their sense of morality and human 'nature'. No one can be declared guilty in the face of the absolute fact of being overwhelmed, but no one can be excused for his moral submission, and he should be ashamed of his personal weakness. Only by constantly maintaining this sense of shame and facing up to one's own weakness can it be possible to break the old dragon imposed on people by tyranny such as the Holocaust, both material and spiritual.

Schindler maintained his sense of shame and confronted his weakness; Goss maintained his sense of shame, but was defeated by weakness. This is the deepest connotation of 'Schindler's List', and it is also the core content that the director has given to this story as the most alarming to the world. ”

The debate between the supporters and the opposition was so intense that it could almost be said that since December 2, there have been heated discussions on variety shows, news programs, and radio programs, and people from all walks of life have been invited to express their views and remarks on the programs, from sociologists to university professors, from historians to social observers, from Jewish groups to black and Asian groups, all of them have come forward to express their views, which has almost made "Schindler's List" a social phenomenon.

Of course, in addition to the pros and cons, there are naturally neutrals. It's not so accurate to say that the neutrals are not so accurate, their point is simple: this is a film, not a documentary, and there is no need to be so serious.

The neutrals believe that Steven has restored history as much as possible, even if the description of A'mon' and Goss is a little more excavated, but it does not embellish, on the contrary, it vividly describes the cruelty of this bloody Nazi officer. Many Jews who had survived the hardships of the concentration camps were terrified when they saw A'mon and Goss on the big screen, not to mention the other spectators who were so frightened by the direct and brutal bloodshed that they broke out in a cold sweat.

Therefore, the conclusion of the neutrals is: pure nonsense!

But no matter what the neutrals think, the dispute between the support and opposition has become a hot topic in society, and the "Schindler's list" has been the focus of society in the past two weeks, whether it is the praise of film critics or the excellent box office list of Xiàn for two consecutive weeks, people are full of curiosity and expectation about this movie. Now, along with the conflict of this batch of remarks, "Schindler's list" is comparable to a presidential election, and has become the focus of everyone's conversation more or less after dinner.

Under such circumstances, as a director, Steven Spielberg had to stand up for the first time to make his position clear, "As a Jew, I empathize with Schindler's story, and believe me, no matter from any point of view, I will not glorify A'mon or other Nazis, even if I am a director, I will not change this fact." I just tried to stand in a calm and onlooker position, presenting that history to the audience, and the controversy about A'mon' and Goss is not necessary in my opinion, because even if Goss has internal struggles and contradictions, it still does not change the fact that he is a murderous demon, and every choice he makes is also a direct guide to his final outcome. ”

Steven seemed very 'excited', even a little too 'excited', so that his face was red-faced, and no one knew his contribution to this movie better than him, but now he was actually smeared, saying that he was beautifying A'mon' and Goss, which is simply unforgivable. What's more, the accusations of those extremist Jewish groups, even though Steven knew that they were too extreme and their ideas were the product of being instigated, still made Steven very concerned and sad. The filming of Schindler's List was a period of torment for Steven, who personally witnessed the difficulties experienced by his compatriots back then, which was even more painful than killing him, but now, his sincerity was questioned, which made it almost impossible for Steven to control his own feelings.

But in the end, Steven forced himself to calm down, "I don't know if the people who say I glorify Goss have seen this movie." If not, I hope you go into the cinema and watch the movie, and you will know what the truth is; If you've seen it, I hope you can seriously recall the plot of the movie and feel the real emotions I injected into the movie. I have a clear conscience!"

Steven's 'agitation' was also supported by Hugo, as the actor of A'mon' and Goss, it is obvious that Hugo is also under great pressure, although this pressure is not as strict as Steven's, but the shackles on his shoulders are more profound - after all, he is the actor of the horn 'color'!" I must emphasize that there is no doubt about the cold-bloodedness and cruelty of A'mon' Yigos, he has experienced struggles, contradictions, and pain, but this is like what anyone would experience in the context of war, he is at least a human being, not a beast who can't think, so it is normal for him to have such a reaction. But even so, it will not erase the crimes he committed. So, I hope you can look at this movie with the right eye, our entire crew has put a lot of effort into this movie, please don't ignore it. ”

After saying this, Hugo seemed to think of something, frowned and mentioned again, "I don't know who the source of this statement is, but I really hope that the person who said these words in the first place can go into the cinema and watch this movie, and I think you will find the answer." ”

This unintentional remark made the focus of the media focus on the culprit in an instant, who was the first to provoke this war?

(To be continued.) If you like this work, you are welcome to come to Genesis to vote for the first recommendation vote and monthly pass, your support is my biggest motivation. ）