Needless to say, a fair and unbiased book review is a welcome feedback for any author.

It's just,Some clouds and mountains are foggy,Headless,No brain,I don't know what to refer to,In addition to affecting the author's writing mood,Make the author want to delete the post,There is no value,Waste paper can also wipe the buttocks,There is no use in venting posts aimlessly。

It is impossible for every author to please all readers when he writes a book, because it is impossible for the author to know the G-point of every reader, and the G-point of a certain reader may be the reverse scale of a certain reader.

What is called the wall falling down and everyone pushing it, falling into the well, making unreasonable accusations and insults to a street writer, and having a prescient posture of "you deserve to hit the street", in fact, it is very despicable and unsympathetic, and readers also want to talk about some basic morality and etiquette.

The starting point gives the author the right to delete posts, because in anticipation of this situation, the author is actually a vulnerable group, carefully pleasing readers, but also have to consider whether their own book can be a foreign book, readers can read it at any time and leave unpleasantly, but the author must have his own credibility and insist on finishing the book, because there will always be so many readers in a book, who like and follow from beginning to end.

The author can be said to have worked hard for these people, one million, two million, and the people who wrote it down like this, not to mention asking for a word or two of encouragement from book friends, and not being scolded to the fullest, are already thankful.

If the author doesn't even have this ability to protect himself, it is estimated that not many authors can write it, and recently the god machine has been scolded by the vertical and horizontal book review area to the point of being incomplete, and there is a kind of sadness about what the book is for.

Many writers succinctly state at the outset that there are two kinds of rejection: one is the party of examination and the other is the party of scolding.

According to the party's nitpicking, Cao Xueqin is alive, and she can't satisfy the appetite of this kind of person, not to mention the level of Internet saliva and hydrology, which is originally mixed with some personal life perceptions in nonsense, and then more upscale, discuss the true meaning of life, express some views and attitudes, give a thumbs up when you see it, and leave at any time if you are unhappy, pick some trivial words, chew the words, and show that you are knowledgeable and talented, this kind of person is really very unstaged.

The scolding party is purely to vent dissatisfaction, and the examination party has the same effect, except for scolding the author to stop more reflection, self-abandonment after reflection, self-pity, and come to a conclusion that must be TJ, decisively ended, it has no effect, and the author stopped changing, but it angered some book friends who felt that the book was still reading, and it was a scolding, a bitter author.

A bitter writer will be trained by the above two people to have a strong nerve and be able to withstand any opposing opinions and blows.

Obviously, the author is such a person, the author dares to put the scolding book post at the top, and dares to use a chapter to discuss differences with book friends, one is to implement the value of "I can disagree with your point of view, but I swear to defend your right to speak", and the other is to let book friends have a positive and negative opinion reference on this book.

You can scold if you are unhappy, but please use civilized words, and the author also reserves the right to delete the post.

The author has a suggestion, in the process of your scolding, it is best to give examples of what makes you unhappy, if the reason is clear and logical, the author will not only not be depressed, but will be happy, because this kind of feedback is of great help to the author to improve the level of writing, the author is happy, and will give you more refinement to encourage (someone said again, what are you, it is your honor to scold you for this street goods, you should kneel in the scolding, and want me to help you improve, I will treat you as a fart!). I say to this kind of person, you can go as far as your thoughts go. ）

When a person says that the book is full of shit, but does not specify where it is shit, nine out of ten people will subconsciously look for this pile of unwarranted shit from the book, and then gradually feel that there is shit everywhere, and another will firmly say, I found it! Sure enough, it's shit.

Therefore, even if you step on dog shit, you should remind everyone to pay attention, please indicate which place, if you just gloat and watch the later people step on it, such a mentality is really unacceptable.

And in this way, the author should also check and reflect and strive for better, and your post will not be a useless post, but a very useful feedback post, which will allow an author to slowly grow into a writer who can write the words you like.

Otherwise, you will never be able to see a novel that satisfies you completely in your life, and when the time comes, you will have to write it yourself, and when you write it yourself, you will know how hard it is for a writer who is scolded to the point of being incomplete.

Another point that the author doesn't understand is that you and I are both strangers, so at least politeness and respect still have to be spoken, right? Could it be that the hostility of this society has made people disdain even basic respect between people?

The above right should be a complaint, and the book review area has been a little depressed recently.