Shi Yuanqing returned, and the situation in the republic quickly stabilized. 【Reading.com】

Unlike the international public opinion, which is highly concerned about the Sino-Indian border conflict, the vast majority of citizens of the Republic are more concerned about one thing, that is, how Wang Yuanqing will punish those treason who started rebellion!

Treason is not a minor crime, and in any country, treason is a felony.

Even in the Western world, which flaunts civilization. The standard sentencing for treason in most countries is the death penalty. The Republic is no exception, and the minimum sentencing standard for treason is the death penalty!

Will Wang Yuanqing send hundreds of traitors to the guillotine?

Domestic public opinion is divided into two extremes, with some people believing that Wang Yuanqing will definitely execute all traitors mercilessly to ensure the stability of the regime; Some people think that Wang Yuanqing will open up the net. Because there are too many high-ranking officials and generals implicated, if the scope of the attack is expanded recklessly, it will backfire.

Only one thing is certain, the vast majority of the population believes that traitors should be severely punished.

When dealing with the traitorous group, Wang Yuanqing's method surprised many people. Except for the leaders of the traitorous group, all the other traitors were prosecuted by the Supreme Procuratorate to the Supreme Court, and the traitors were tried and convicted through regular judicial channels. In order to ensure the fairness and openness of the trial, not only did the Supreme Court set up a special trial team. The Judicial Committee, which is responsible to the plenary session of the National Assembly, participated in the trial throughout the whole process, and also issued a pass to the major domestic and foreign news media to report on the whole process, allowing reporters to report live on the whole process of the trial within the framework of the relevant laws of the Republic.

After the news of the Yuan Fu Gong Year, it immediately aroused extensive discussion in all walks of life.

It's not that there are no voices of opposition, but there are a lot of people who oppose it. All opponents raised a question. That is, how long would it take to try hundreds of traitors under the regular judicial route? Some people also cite the process of trying such cases in foreign countries, arguing that the trial will last for years or even decades. It is not a problem to let the traitors live for a few more years, after all, the traitors will be detained in a detention center according to the law during the trial, which is not much different from a prison sentence. The point is. Will the years-long prostitution pose a threat to the stability of the republic? According to these people's point of view, special things are done. As long as the relevant evidence is conclusive. Trial procedures should be simplified as much as possible to speed up the trial.

As with the opposition, the voices of support are high. In the opinion of support. Wang Yuanqing's failure to intervene in judicial trials in his capacity as a state minister is a major advance in the political civilization of the Republic. Yuan was able to hand over the traitors to the judiciary for trial regardless of personal losses, which was a major change in the political system of the republic. Only through a fair, open, and strict judicial trial can we establish the majesty of the law, make more people respect and abide by the law, and fundamentally put an end to the recurrence of similar treason. From the long-term perspective of the country, it is only when everyone respects and abides by the law that the Republic can truly enter the era of the rule of law. Wang Yuanqing set an example precisely for the purpose of establishing a perfect legal system in the republic.

Real gold is not afraid of fire, and truth is not afraid of arguments.

The more intense the discussion in society, the better it will be for the development of the republic.

Only through extensive debate, more people's attention to this incident, and more people joining the debate, can more people have a deeper understanding of treason, a deeper understanding of the legal system, and a clearer understanding of the law-dominated social system.

In the eyes of others, the judicial trial is only for the purpose of dealing with the traitorous group.

In Wang Yuanqing's view, the greatest significance of judicial adjudication is to let the law penetrate into the hearts of the people.

In contrast to public opinion in the Republic, international public opinion has focused on the Sino-Indian border conflict.

Shortly after the secret ceasefire agreement between China and India. The third deletion made a new report on the Sino-Indian border conflict, releasing the information provided by the US government to the public, declaring that the Indian government had compromised with China. End the border conflict with China at the expense of India's national interests.

In the old days, there were anti-government demonstrations in India.

The demonstrations, organized by the opposition parties, were on a massive scale and were aimed at the Congress government led by Rurajapani.

Although Rurajapani declared that the demonstrations organized by the opposition party had endangered India's national security, citing that the country was in a special period, and immediately dispatched the military and police to disperse the demonstrators, the effect of the crackdown was very limited. As the news spreads that the Indian government has lost tens of thousands of square kilometers of land. The more volatile the situation in India becomes.

It was also at this time that the deletion suddenly changed his tone and did not focus on the Sino-Indian conflict.

The attitude is the attitude of the United States, and the attitude of the United States suddenly took a 180-degree turn. It is very puzzling to those who follow the Sino-Indian conflict.

After the party sings, the party appears.

As the silence fell, Al Jazeera began to report heavily on the conflict between Finja and India.

Unlike the deletion, Al Jazeera did not focus on the secret ceasefire agreement between China and India. Instead, the focus was on several aid deals reached with Indian Prime Minister Rajapani during Brudlin's visit to New Delhi. According to Al Jazeera, the attitude of the United States appeared to be suddenly sloppy, with Brooklyn making a big laugh and cry in New Delhi. As long as Rurajapani can favor the United States in India's basic strategy and willingly act as the vanguard of the United States to contain China, the United States certainly does not want political turmoil in India.

The key question is what will end the Sino-Indian conflict?

On the day of the thugs, Rurajapani finally came forward.

In an interview with Hindustan Television, Rurajapani made it clear that India has not signed any form of ceasefire agreement with China and has not withdrawn its troops from the eastern region.

The Prime Minister himself stated that the domestic turmoil in India had subsided.

It has to be admitted that Rurajapani did not lie. It is true that India has not signed any form of ceasefire agreement with China, because there is no such thing as "signing" in a verbal agreement; It is also true that India has not withdrawn its troops from the east, and even as promised in the secret ceasefire agreement, India will deploy at least 10,000 troops in the east.

International public opinion has also softened a little at this time.

Al Jazeera, whether it is Al Jazeera, has continued to report on the Sino-Indian conflict, as if the conflict is over.

It was also at this time that several commercial satellite photos taken by Europhora appeared on the official website of the French newspaper Le Figaro. Although there are no annotations on the photos, those who know the knowledge can see at a glance that these photos show the military deployment of China and India.

China is not ceasefire, but is preparing for a new military strike.

India also did not cease fire and began to deploy new defensive lines in the eastern sector.

Public opinion in the country was in an uproar again.

Subsequently, more and more commercial satellite photos appeared on the Internet, most of them related to China's military deployment, but also some of India's.

Both sides are strengthening their military forces in the areas of warring. It seems that preparations are being made for a larger-scale war operation.

That evening, an unnamed Pentagon official provided an update that India did have a secret verbal agreement with China that China would strike again at military targets in India if it did not reduce the number of troops in the eastern region to less than 10,000 by midnight local time.

At this time, it was already morning in Beijing.

After the deletion of the report, the Sino-Indian conflict has once again become the focus of public opinion.

It was also around this time that several new photographs appeared on the official website of Le Figaro, and soon there were online high-profile information on Pakistan's military deployment in the northern part of Kashmir.

Pakistan is involved in the Sino-Indian conflict!

There are growing signs that a border conflict that should have been brought under control is about to turn into a regional war.

Pakistani troops are massing near the actual ceasefire line and could cross the actual ceasefire line into the Indian-controlled areas of Kashmir at any time, firing the first shot of the fifth Indo-Pakistani war. If Pakistan were to be drawn into the conflict, India would have no choice but to go to war with two powerful adversaries at once.

No one has forgotten China, because China is the decisive factor in the war.

The Pakistani army is preparing, and so is the squadron.

No one doubts that the conflict is about to turn into war. The point is, what kind of war is this?

A limited regional war like the Fourth Indo-Pakistani War, or an all-out war between India and two powerful adversaries?

The later the time drags on, the more dangerous the situation becomes.

The Pakistani army stationed in Kashmir has been in a state of combat readiness for a long time, and it only takes four or eight hours at most to prepare for the offensive.

The strength of the squadron is unquestionable, and it is definitely ready for war.

With an all-out fight, is there still room for maneuver in India?

In the afternoon of the next day, the situation was tense to the extreme. Almost everyone believes that if India does not make a clear statement in the next few hours, the war will break out in the early hours of the day.

It is impossible for the news media to obtain war intelligence in the same way that the military does. Although the resolution of modern commercial mapping satellites is already very impressive, even much higher than the military reconnaissance satellites of the Force, such as the "European Resources Satellite". The maximum resolution can reach milk meters, and it can be used as a military reconnaissance satellite, but commercial satellites have their limitations. For example, it is not possible to change the flight orbit as frequently as a military satellite to conduct focused reconnaissance of a certain area. As a result, news outlets that rely on commercial satellites for information are unlikely to stay up to date.

Satellites cannot be relied upon, and journalists have other means.

In the evening, the first US military stationed at Singapore's Changi Air Base was put on maximum alert, and several large planes took off one after another. Subsequently, Al Jazeera's military base, which was on its way to Pakistan, was put into combat readiness, and a large number of Pakistani troops were ready to go to the front. Only there is no news from China, because foreign journalists cannot enter the military bases in Tibet.

It is for this reason that everyone agrees that China's upcoming actions are decisive.