On the morning of the 24th, after 30 hours of fierce fighting, the warring sides temporarily ceased to wield

After his second meeting with US Secretary of State Brudrin, Japanese Foreign Minister Shikawa Kitayama traveled to New York for an emergency UN session. Because Japan is not a rotating member of the Security Council, it does not have the right to convene meetings in the Security Council.

In accordance with the president's instructions, the CIA~ leaked the confirmed information to the major news outlets in the United States.

Surprisingly, it was not the American news media that first reported on the Republic's bombing of Japan's nuclear facilities, but the Republic's news media.

Beginning in the early morning of the 24th, several television stations in the Republic adjusted their programming arrangements to comprehensively report on the war against Japan.

In addition to announcing the sinking of Japan's strategic nuclear submarines, the destruction of Japan's nuclear weapons and missile bases, and the successful interception of Japan's strategic ballistic missiles, the Republic's news media focused on the bombing campaign against Japan's nuclear facilities. However, there is a difference in the severity of the reports, and the news media of the Republic of China have focused on military-related news such as Japan's secret development of nuclear forces, the import of nuclear materials from various countries in the world, the construction of breeder reactors, the construction of heavy water plants, and the construction of nuclear weapons laboratories in the name of scientific research in the name of "civilian use." In other respects, the news media of the republic reported only briefly on the number of bombed targets and losses in the fighting.

We have to admit that the modern information network is too developed.

Before American radio could publish more detailed information, a comprehensive analysis of the news published by the news media of the Republic appeared on the Internet.

There are only points that can show that the Republic bombed Japan's civilian nuclear facilities.

A total of one target is destroyed, while Japan's military nuclear facilities will not exceed 50. That is, there are more than 200 ~ more than 200 targets that are completely unrelated to military use. Good netizens have even collected the number of civilian nuclear power plants in Japan, i.e., light water reactors and controlled fusion reactors, proving that the Republic's bombing campaign was aimed not only at military targets, but also at civilian targets in Japan.

limelight together. There are all sorts of theories on the Internet.

A netizen managed to get a map of the distribution of Japan's civilian nuclear power plants. And a comprehensive analysis was made on the basis of the bombing situation announced by the Republic. According to its conclusions. If the information released by the Republic of China is completely true, all of Japan's nuclear facilities will be completely destroyed. About 75% of Japan's territory will be heavily contaminated with radioactivity. This is because the vast majority of nuclear power plants are built in large cities or near major rivers. So at least 100 million Japanese are threatened. If the Japanese government cannot carry out the evacuation in time. The vast majority of Japanese people have less than 5 years to live!

This is by no means alarmist. Because the military intelligence and the CIA have come to the conclusion of the local analysis.

The question is. Can Japan afford to evacuate 100 million people? Even if there is a capacity to transfer nationals from polluted areas to areas that are not contaminated. The remaining land cannot accommodate 100 million Japanese people.

Emergency session of the UN General Assembly. Kitayama Shikawa after strongly condemning China's attack on Japan's civilian nuclear facilities. Addressed to all countries. It is hoped that Japan will be able to provide humanitarian aid in the interior, including radiation protection facilities, and that some countries will be able to temporarily accept Japanese war refugees.

Debated. Geng Zhongming, Permanent Representative of the Republic to the United Nations, made it clear. Japan was the first to attack the Republic using a nuclear-tipped ground-to-earth strategic ballistic missile. constitutes a substantially strategic nuclear strike. The republic did not engage in strategic nuclear retaliation-for-tat. It can be regarded as benevolent and righteous. It began with Japan's secret development of nuclear weapons. The Republic has repeatedly demanded that Japan act in accordance with the principle of maintaining world peace and stability. Complete elimination and renunciation of nuclear weapons as soon as possible. Japan turned a deaf ear to this, and not only did it not take any substantive action during the year. Also behaved aggressively in negotiations. In the case of aggression. The republic was forced to launch a war of aggression and counterattack. This is because Japan has never released details of its military nuclear facilities. It has also never allowed international organizations, including the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), to conduct inspections of its nuclear facilities in the mainland. Therefore, the Republic can only carry out a devastating attack on all nuclear facilities in Japan.

The Republic's crackdowns are not only motivated by the consideration of its own security and aggressive counterattacks, but also by safeguarding the common interests of the human world.

The United Nations is a place of rift, so even an urgent meeting will not solve the problem.

After several hours of discussion, only the proposed proposal for the provision of humanitarian supplies to Japan, including drugs for the treatment of radiation sickness, was adopted. In other words, no country has pledged to provide humanitarian assistance to Japan, but only morally supported the provision of humanitarian assistance to Japan.

After the conference, Kitayama Shikawa began to meet and negotiate with representatives of various major countries.

Kitayama Shikawa's positive actions show that the nuclear contamination in Japan is already very serious and must be resolved as soon as possible.

It was only at this time that the Western news media, led by them, began to carry out in-depth coverage of the "war in Japan".

In the early morning of the 24th Eastern Time, at the suggestion of the United States, the United Nations Security Council held a closed-door meeting to discuss issues arising from the "Japanese War".

Needless to say, this was another meeting.

The representative of the United States strongly condemned it

The use of "inhumane" means in the war has seriously endangered innocent civilians in China, and China is required to bear full responsibility for this. The representative of China responded strongly that the United States' connivance at the "Japanese nuclear issue" was the direct cause of the outbreak of war.

Both powers have the right of veto, and the consultations will not produce any substantive results.

Although the Security Council did not recognize the legitimacy of China's "war of aggression and counterattack", it did not deny that China has the right to carry out strategic counterattacks.

While politicians and diplomats are arguing at the United Nations headquarters, the countries on the battlefield are already taking active action.

Because the Republican Air Force bombed Japan's transportation infrastructure on the first day of the war, and Japan is a country with many mountains and rivers, it was difficult to evacuate the people of Honshu and Kyushu, the most polluted islands, in a wartime manner when the bridges and tunnels on the main transportation routes were blown up. All the Japanese government can do is to send a special force to various places to check the extent of radioactive contamination, and to send people to areas that are not contaminated or not seriously contaminated, and to distribute radiation protection suits and drugs for the treatment of radiation diseases to people in seriously polluted areas. Because the quantity of radiation protection clothing is very limited, and the drugs for the treatment of radiation sickness are "strategic reserves", the amount of reserves is very limited, so the Japanese government's rescue efforts have not been smooth. To make matters worse, many unpolluted or less polluted areas are inaccessible mountains and forests, making it difficult to provide basic livelihood for the millions of "war refugees" in the event of wartime evacuations.

Japan is conducting a war evacuation, and North Korea is also carrying out a wartime evacuation.

Although the DPRK is even more scarce in supplies and does not even have a stockpile of drugs to treat radioactive contamination, with the full support of the Republic, the DPRK government still issued a timely evacuation order to the people in the southern region, and organized personnel and transportation to move the elderly and children to the relative safety of the northern region first.

Russia's movement is also very positive.

In order to be sure, the Russian government issued an emergency order to the Far East. It wasn't until Russia's meteorological services confirmed that radioactive clouds over Japan would not drift across the Sea of Japan and fall into the Russian Far East that the Russian government lowered its alert level and began to reassure the panicked population.

At noon on the 24th Eastern time, at the invitation of the U.S. government, the ambassadors of the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Australia, Canada, Mexico and other countries to the United States gathered at the White House to discuss the "Japanese People's Rescue Operation" with the President of the United States, the Secretary of State, and the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Japan.

How to save hundreds of millions of Japanese has become a top priority for Western countries.

The problem is that there are so many countries in one, and each country has its own intentions, and it is impossible for all countries to be "impartial," and it is still less possible for them to give up the interests of their own people for the sake of irrelevant Japanese.

If nothing else, Australia and Canada have been at odds with each other on the issue of saving the Japanese.

If Western countries agree, the most likely countries to accept Japanese refugees are Australia and Canada, which are vast and sparsely populated. For Australia, which has a population of only 2,000~more than 10,000, and Canada, which has a population of only more than 30 million, if they agree to accept hundreds of millions of Japanese refugees, will Australia still be Australia, Canada or Canada? Not to mention that the nationals of Australia and Canada will not agree, and neither will the politicians of the two countries.

At the meeting, both the United States and European countries were putting pressure on Australia.

Australia is the closest to Japan and has the best natural conditions. More importantly, in the strategic planning of the United States, Canada is an ally that cannot be abandoned. European countries are even more powerless, because many European countries are sparsely populated and cannot accommodate many Japanese.

As with the UN General Assembly, this is yet another slap-up meeting.

Although the United States has pledged to provide at least $1 trillion in aid to Australia, European countries have pledged to provide Australia with the same amount of aid, and even Mexico has pledged to pay for it, the Australian ambassador has made it clear that the responsibility cannot be borne by Australia alone, and Australia has no such obligation.

At the end of the debate, all countries recognized that the Yamato nation, which was on the verge of extinction, must be saved as soon as possible.

With the help of the President of the United States, the representatives of various countries finally agreed to adopt a "quota" method to admit Japanese refugees.

Consent is consent, but how to implement it is something that no one can decide.

If nothing else, how much should the United States admit, how much should Australia admit, how much should Canada admit, how much should other countries admit?

The United States is not willing to bear the burden, Australia is willing to bear the burden, and Canada and other countries are no exception.

In front of Kitayama Shikawa, the representatives of one country argued endlessly, but they did not come up with a single result.

In the end, the meeting did not come up with any substantive proposals, but the countries agreed to convene a formal meeting at a higher level to discuss the solution of the Japanese refugee problem.

Is it possible that this issue will be resolved? (To be continued, if you want to know what will happen next, please log in to idian, more chapters, support the author, support genuine reading!) )