I have to say that I happened to read a book review and saw something that made something out of nothing and made people laugh at the same time. I feel that the reviewer is very illiterate, very impulsive (such people basically can't read deeper books, can't tell right from wrong), and is very funny, in his opinion, he is a bandit with a gun, and he doesn't know that the police also carry a gun.

So he deduces a very pernicious conclusion from Spengler and civilization, which is that the book is preaching something like anti-nationalism -- because the book also refers to Spengler, to the evolution of civilization, to the sand and to the people, to the Islamic ......, just like the anti-nationalists.

In fact, in fact, many times it should not have been so straightforward, and the result of straightforwardness was that the book was sealed after being discovered - but in order to prove his innocence, it is necessary to say that at the present time, the opponents have specially found one or two strategists to come out and advocate something, and the purpose of this is not so much academic as to build up opposition. From ancient times to the present, this trick has been very common, but now it is played in a different way.

Because of this, the strategists turned a blind eye to the fact that the Chinese civilization was different from other civilizations in the world, and that there was a second round of life, that is, the 1,500 years of life from the Battle of Huangshui to the end of the Qing Dynasty. Why do they turn a blind eye? Because of the set of things advocated by the strategists, many of them were copied from Spengler's Chinese heir, Mr. Lei Haizong, and other gentlemen of the Warring States Policy School, who were not too old to pick up people's teeth, so it was certainly better to write novels in this way than to be below, but he was barely qualified to do academics. Since he had read Mr. Lei's book, he naturally knew Mr. Lei's point of view: Chinese civilization has its particularities, and since she can have a second round of life (the Battle of Huangshui - the end of the Qing Dynasty), then there is naturally the possibility of a third round of life. However, in order to oppose the present and stir up public opinion, the strategists turned a blind eye to this, and they concluded that civilization was over and that catastrophe was coming.

I've read a lot of book reviews, and I'm speechless for some readers. If you don't like to read a book, you can not read it, no one forces you, really. But if you don't like the book, and you can't understand it, it would be ridiculous to comment on it in a half-understood way, confusing the world in the book with the utilitarian behavior of the strategists in the real world, in order to show that you were prescient.

What the book wants to express is to use the most outstanding talents of modern times (although Mr. Lei Haizong is not in the protagonist's era, it is not necessary to advance his views by ten years) with their knowledge and wisdom to find a third round of vitality for Chinese civilization. In their view, Chinese civilization will not end, but will continue. I think that alone is enough to prove the difference between this book and the strategist.

If you say too much, you will lose it, so far. In addition, the book review area is very chaotic, and I wanted to appoint General Yuwentai as the moderator, but he is not his real name, so ask for a moderator (remember not to argue with book friends, because arguments will bring greater disaster and resentment, and it is normal for readers to complain, especially this book is very abusive, and the tone is wrong at the beginning, sorry for them.) ）

And: Coming up for the New Year, I wish you all success and a prosperous Year of the Monkey! (To be continued.) )