readx; Early the next morning, the United States sent a serious protest, demanding an explanation from China and a demand for compensation!

Although the Ziya reported that the US submarine fired the torpedo first, and the Ziya counterattacked, how can I say that it is not the Ziya that has sunk now but the US submarine, and now the Americans insist that the responsibility lies with the Chinese side, so they have to let China make painstaking defenses. Pen & Fun & Pavilion www.biquge.info

In order to avoid a further escalation of the conflict, the Chinese first provided the combat records of the night of the Ya, in order to show that they were attacked first and believed that they had been attacked by the submarine before counterattacking, and the fact that the Americans had learned from the surviving officers and soldiers was indeed that they launched the torpedo attack first.

However, no matter what the facts are, the diplomatic bickering will continue, and after many days of quarreling, China has good food and shelter, plus sent a special plane to transport those American submarine crews back to the United States, and also generously said that they will not charge a penny for food and drink and special plane transportation costs, and this dispute can be regarded as an end. Since Chen Jingyun's reunification of China, there has been no matter of compensation to foreign countries, and Chen Jingyun would rather use other methods to solve this matter than pay even a dime in compensation.

This is a matter of politics, and money is secondary.

However, the United States was forced to accept this fact in order to avoid the expansion of its influence, and it was indeed the first to launch the torpedo.

However, after this incident, in order to prevent such a thing from happening again, the Chinese and American navies decided to establish an identification system that could be used to identify each other when they met and avoid another accidental attack.

Whether in the air or at sea, the series of encounters and potential confrontations between China and the United States have sharply deepened the conflict and contradictions between the two countries.

In order to occupy an advantageous position in a possible Sino-US war in the future, the two sides are collecting each other's intelligence more and more intensively, in addition to a large number of spies from both sides beginning to enter each other, the two countries in the Philippines and at sea are very frequent in mutual reconnaissance and tracking behavior, which is used to collect all kinds of military intelligence, especially the intelligence of some of the main ships of the Chinese Navy.

It didn't take long for the Americans to send a report on the Aoyama-class aircraft carriers to the top of the Admiralty!

"According to all aspects of intelligence, their Aoyama-class aircraft carriers are not weaker than our Essex-class aircraft carriers in terms of surname, and there is a very important point, a large number of their aircraft carriers have a very strange layout, their deck is not straight to the deck, but there is a deck floating outward on the left side of the front half, and according to our many aerial reconnaissance findings, they are landing on this section of the inclined deck, and we found a very interesting phenomenon, That's when they had a go-around during take-off, which was impossible on a straight deck! ”

According to the relevant arguments of the Admiralty, their inclined deck can effectively reduce the landing accident rate, and can also carry out take-off and landing operations at the same time, which is of great help to increase the combat effectiveness of aircraft carriers. Therefore, we suggest that, in the subsequent construction of aircraft carriers, try to adopt a similar deck layout! ”

China's beveled deck research and application began in 1940, and the real beveled deck aircraft carriers were put into service after 1942, and in the state of war, China kept secret the specific surnames and appearance of capital ships at all levels, and outsiders were rarely able to know the real utility of China's beveled deck.

In the era of no Internet, there was no reconnaissance satellite, and it was very difficult to discover the situation of the other party's advanced equipment. It is impossible to know these key data about the speed.

However, although it is impossible to learn more about China's oblique aircraft carriers, this does not affect the idea that the United States has also begun to build and apply oblique aircraft carriers.

In addition to the fact that the US military has found through experiments that the oblique aircraft carrier can effectively reduce the landing accident rate and carry out take-off and landing operations at the same time, there is also a very important reason, that is, we must have what the enemy has!

Just like in the twenties and thirties, countries built treaty heavy cruisers on a large scale, not because of how good the treaty heavy cruisers were, but because they were being built, and if you didn't build them, then you might fall behind in future naval operations, and the same reason appeared in the early stages of World War II when the United States built the large cruiser Alaska-class, not because of how useful he was, but because of the large cruisers built by the Chinese Navy on a large scale.

What the enemy already has, we must also have, even if it is not useful at all, we must have it, what is prevented is some unforeseen situation, if it is really useless at all, anyway, everyone has built it, and everyone will suffer together.

And this concept is a very important point in the naval arms race of various countries!

Whether it's useful or not, let's talk about it after it's made!

Although the U.S. Navy still knows little about oblique aircraft carriers, it does not affect them to begin to pay attention to and immediately build oblique aircraft carriers, and in order to avoid unnecessary mistakes, they even directly copy the appearance design of the Chinese Navy's Qingshan-class beveled deck, this is because the Essex class of the United States and the Qingshan-class of China are similar in displacement, although the specific design and internal structure are different, but the two still have great similaritiesIn particular, the appearance on the surface is difficult to distinguish from a distance, and there is a reason for this situation, that is, China and the United States have spent a lot of time and energy on the research and development of aircraft carriers and found that for propeller aircraft, an aircraft carrier of about 30,000 tons is just the optimal tonnage of the surname-price ratio, and the carrying capacity of the aircraft with a small tonnage is too small, and the large tonnage is a waste. And the reason why both sides adopt the method of single-layer hangar, hangar deck and open bow is also similar, that is, their most priority goal for the use of aircraft carriers is to carry more aircraft, and the intended combat area is also in the Pacific Ocean, so that there are deck mooring, hangar upside down spare aircraft, open bow and other designs.

And he said, "I am also a 30,000-ton Dafeng, and they use the model of an armored aircraft carrier, in order to ensure the safety of the aircraft carrier and the safety of carrier-based aircraft as much as possible." The British closed bow and armoured aircraft deck were due to the fact that they had to fight in the Atlantic, where the wind and waves were high and the seas had to take into account not only the operational stability of the aircraft carrier, but also the possibility of the aircraft carrier being attacked by the enemy in a stormy weather.

The development of aircraft carriers varies according to the different strategies of each country, but China and the United States have a great common surname in the development of their navies because of their extremely similar strategic qualities.

The similarity between the Aoyama-class aircraft carriers and the Essex-class aircraft carriers has made the Americans' beveled deck work much smoother, and many aircraft carriers built in the future have changed the through deck to the beveled deck, and the U.S. Navy's carrier-based aviation units have also conducted a lot of research on the combat mode of the beveled deck, and carried out intensive training in many land bases.

The use of the beveled deck does not mean that you can change the beveled deck, the use of aircraft carriers is a complicated problem, and these things are not visible on the surface, and many details need to be used for many years to find problems and solve them, and these things will not be taught to you, you have to spend a lot of time to explore.

Not to mention anything else, the landing signal and command system on the Qingshan-class oblique aircraft carrier alone is not so simple, which involves a lot of information, for example, the plane is obliquely close to the aircraft carrier when landing, in which the aircraft and the aircraft carrier have an angle, this problem is not a problem for jet fighters that land at high speed in later generations, but for propeller aircraft that land at low speed in this era, it is a big problem, and low speed means that the flight time is long when landing, And the longer the time, the greater the angle between the aircraft and the aircraft carrier, after all, the plane and the aircraft carrier are in relative motion.

Therefore, this problem seems inconspicuous, but when the sloped deck of the Qingshan class was first used, it caused great trouble to the Chinese naval aviation, and there were many accidents in a row, and it was only after the improvement of a series of landing process systems such as landing signal lights that this problem was solved.

In addition, landing, the beveled deck can allow the aircraft that has not landed successfully to carry out the go-around, and this is also the biggest advantage of the beveled deck, but the go-around process is not so easy to do, for example, under what circumstances does the fighter go back to the fighter? If something goes wrong in this process, such as not being able to construct a blocking cable and the aircraft is not powered enough, then the go-around will not be possible, and these are huge problems that require a long period of testing and research to solve.

Aircraft carriers, in fact, are much more difficult to exert their greatest combat effectiveness than to use battleships! It is absolutely not that with an aircraft carrier, you will be able to exert combat effectiveness, nor that you will be able to learn the essence of someone else's naval aviation by learning the appearance of an aircraft carrier.

However, the real essence of these things is basically kept secret by various countries and is not circulated to the outside world, so among the four countries that now have aircraft carriers, there is not much difference between the aircraft carrier combat systems of China, the United States and Britain on the surface, but the actual details are very different.