It can be said that in addition to its unique decryption gameplay, a plot of the entire game has also aroused heated discussions among players.

Especially the AI GLaDOS in the game.

Most players hated it at first.

Use yourself as a test subject, and then end up trying to unload the mill and kill the donkey to kill yourself.

It's very irritating.

But with the development of the game's plot, especially when Wheatley seized power later, GLaDOS saved Cher again at the last moment, which also made many players have another idea about GLaDOS.

After sending Cher away, the dance moves of the four sentry robots, the farewell of thousands of sentry robots, and the song Want You Gone all make the player's heart feel strange.

I don't seem to hate GLaDOS so much.

Even a lot of players have carried out a second creation of the same people on the Internet.

Of course, this is also a major feature of Nebula Games.

Which character under Nebulas Games has not been recreated?

From motherizing Kuba, and then letting Mario be with Kubaji.

will destroy the dragon mother, and let the great tool man Cang Lanxing be with Baazi.

There is also the motherhood of Alduin, so that the Dragonborn and Alduin are happy together.

Some are even more excessive, directly drawing Zax and Claude in women's clothing, and now they don't even need to be mother-in-law.

Just a smothering GLaDOS?

It's just a small thing.

However, when many players expressed their love for GLaDOS.

Another player has expressed a different opinion.

That is, in "Portal", there is no good person at all except Cher!

Do you think GLaDOS is finally getting better?

Do you think GLaDOS's last words are all true?

Miss by a mile!

The cake is a lie!

It has never gotten better from start to finish!

The proof of this is that in the two-player story, after the player has cleared the level cooperatively, he will see that the door underground contains hundreds of human pods.

And GLaDOS gets excited.

You did it! You really did it! ’

'The test you've done is worth it!' ’

'Just look at all the test subjects!' ’

'Think of all the tests! ’

'You saved science!' ’

Now, let's get started! ’

Therefore, GLaDOS is not getting better, but because GLaDOS has more resources, it no longer bothered with Cher's one resource.

So in the GLaDOS in the game, she only made a superficial submission to Cher, but she was still dissatisfied in her heart.

And about Wheatley's stupid core, it's not stupid, even if he ends up being exiled to the moon, his apology to Cher is still full of lies.

Maybe he just wants to get back to the Aperture Tech Lab and get Cher back to help him take over GLaDOS.

If GLaDOS didn't have those thousands of human test items in the game, would GLaDOS still let Cher go like this?

Such a topic has also caused a lot of controversy among players.

After all, it seems to be reasonable.

However, I soon felt that GLaDOS was a player who had become better, and I also posted about it.

"I don't agree with you at all! GLaDOS has more human experiments, which is not arguable, but it is not helpless for Cher's GLaDOS, but it is really emotional, not full of lies. ”

Subsequently, many players gave examples to illustrate.

For example, in the final battle, GLaDOS could have thrown Cher into space.

But he still saved Cher, why is that?

Including after pulling Cher back, Cher fell into a coma during this period of time, and GLaDOS also had a lot of opportunities to kill her.

And in the two-player mode, you'll be sent GLaDOS really tsundere, all the way saying that you want to kill the person who almost killed you, only to find out that it's a bird at the end, and you're scared to pee when you see a bird.

GLaDOS couldn't bear to smash the bird's egg, until the end of the CG animation, he kept cursing the newborn bird, but he accidentally broke the birdcage and panicked.

At the same time, when Cher is finally let out, when the elevator is opened, the four machine gun sentries at the door can kill Cher in an instant, but the four machine gun sentries just dance to say goodbye to Cher.

And the last black square, which is the small square that Cher threw into the incinerator earlier.

GLaDOS is also a way for Cher to reunite with her 'friends'.

The purpose of GLaDOS has always remained the same, but I have a completely different feeling for Cher.

In particular, GLaDOS warns Cher not to come back at the end, which also shows that GLaDOS realizes that the human test in the basement may one day run out.

So it doesn't want Cher to come back one day after the test runs out.

Each has a point of view, and countless players in the game are also engaged in a scramble to discuss.

Posts about this idea quickly amassed tens of thousands of replies from players.

There are even quite a few players who are also working on Yang Chen's official account, hoping that Yang Chen can give an official answer when he comes out.

…………………………

At this time, inside Nebula Games, Yang Chen was playing billiards in the lounge.

Lin Jiayi, who was next to him, put down the mobile phone in his hand and walked to the table with a handsome shot.

Then both the black and white balls go into the hole.

"Ahem, Mr. Yang, have you read the topic of GLaDOS on the Internet?"

Facing Yang Chen's disdainful gaze, Lin Jiayi coughed lightly twice in an attempt to resolve this invisible embarrassment.

"What's wrong?" Yang Chen asked.

After all, it is rare to find someone with such skills, and when the opponent meets a good talent, Yang Chen is not good at making Lin Jiayi too embarrassed, so he asked very cooperatively.

"Speaking of Mr. Yang, what kind of artificial intelligence is GLaDOS?" Lin Jiayi asked with some curiosity.

Although he himself was involved in the development of Portal, it was more about the level design of the game.

As for the plot in the game, this piece was all filled in by Yang Chen.

So what kind of artificial intelligence is GLaDOS?

Although he also read the plot planning book, he really didn't understand it too much.

"It's up to the players to understand it, they think GLaDOS is bad, then GLaDOS is a lie from beginning to end, including letting Cher go at the end; And if players are willing to believe that GLaDOS opens its heart and lungs to Cher in the end and has a different kind of emotion, then it has a different kind of emotion. Yang Chen smiled and gave a very big answer.

There are a thousand Hamlets for a thousand readers.

Although for the most part, it is your Hamlet who is different from my Hamlet, so I will order you to be grassed.

But in Yang Chen's opinion, how to understand it mainly depends on one of his own ideas.

The deliberately vague setting is just for the player to understand.

This thing is not a mathematical equation, where is there a fixed answer?