As a points-based game, PUBG will naturally have points that affect the situation of the game, which can not only make the game fierce and more enjoyable, but also make the game conservative and rational. For example, in the final game of the PGL Invitational Tournament, GHOST, who temporarily ranked first in points, chose to hold on to the whole game after understanding his own advantages, and GRUBIE, who wanted to hit the first place, chose to kill the whole game, from head to chicken, and in the end there was still a head difference of one head with GHOST, who was at the top of the list.

From the perspective of a professional team, is there anything wrong with GHOST's play? No, if a professional team wants to win the championship, it will inevitably choose the optimal solution to execute, isn't it good?

Definitely not, GHOST's advantage is accumulated by its own operation, including the means of making the opponent unable to get kill points. The game of the points system should not only look at whether the gun in the game is intense, but must rely on various methods to accumulate points and expand the advantage.

The organizers want to improve the spectacle of the game is worthy of praise from the audience, but it should not be this way, since they enjoy the benefits of the points system to stimulate the team's points-grabbing play, they must also tolerate some of the drawbacks brought by the point system.

Although Sun Yaosheng believes that seeing the situation clearly and making the optimal solution will not reduce the enjoyment, through the above two games and PGL examples, he still feels that there is a balance between the spectacle of the game and the operation of the players without giving away heads, and the organizers can try to master how to adjust this balance point, which should give more freedom to professional players.

What Sun Yaosheng hopes to see is a game that is not only limited to the game, but a game with many tactics, players rely on their brains and skills to play, a game in which a hundred flowers bloom.

"This organizer is not careful, and this point is not just deducted. No player will play negatively, and if they dare to play negatively, they will face the accusations of the boss when they go back, not their organizers who will take the initiative to deduct points. So I don't think this point should be deducted. Sun Yaosheng shook his head and said his opinion.

This competition is actually not very authoritative, and Sun Yaosheng has not paid attention to it at all.

But as soon as the news appeared, the problem immediately came. Sun Yaosheng took his mobile phone and glanced at the points ranking, their Chinese team's IU was ranked second, and there were many other teams he had never heard of.

And this IU team was officially punished and deducted 30 points because of self-thunder, although from the ranking point of view, these 30 points do not affect the identity of IU's second place, but the official deduction of points has made many viewers and netizens feel very incomprehensible, and even angry.

There are also many spectators watching the game, and in this game, it can be seen that there were only IU's Cangyu and SKC full in the finals at that time, and the four SKC people were in the safe zone, and IU was at an absolute disadvantage in terms of number and terrain, and it was impossible to kill the four SKC players in this situation!

So when IU's Cangyu found out about the SKC team members, he chose to mine himself in place and not give his head to SKC, which is not an excessive move.

But it was such a tactic that everyone thought was normal, and IU was punished by the official negative game after the game.

Many netizens said that they couldn't accept such a punishment, and Sun Yaosheng himself couldn't accept such a punishment if he was a player.

Whether it is from the perspective of the audience, fans, players or players, Sun Yaosheng feels that he has no problem in this place.

On the premise of judging the situation on the field, he made the most favorable decision for himself, determined that he was the only one left except for the opposite side, and then did not give points to the opponent when he was sure that there was no chance to go further.

Every step is a choice in your favor. If this is all negative, there is no positive team except for the chicken-eating team. It can only be said that the one who makes the rules NC!

What if you accidentally thundered yourself, were crushed to death by a teammate's car, and jumped off a building and fell to your death?

How do you tell if these are deliberate or deliberate or deliberate? What exactly is the criterion for judging negative play and carelessness? Is it possible to deduct points for committing suicide in the finals no matter what?

If not giving away points is regarded as a negative game, then being beaten to death and being poisoned outside the circle is not a negative game? Being suffocated in the water by someone is not a negative game? Is it against the concept of survival in this game to take the risk of being killed when you see someone, is it a negative game?

If a teammate is accidentally injured in a car accident and the situation does not allow him to kill his teammate if he can't save it, is it a negative game?

If you assume a situation, I know that I don't have a chance to enter the circle, I can't give the opponent 15 points, maybe the opponent is 15 points behind me to win the championship, currently our team is first, what to do on the opposite side is still sweeping me, I can't do it, this is a tactical arrangement, the game is playing points, and not eating chickens, since the points should have their own tactics, then the early poison is a negative game?

Since the game is set to kill itself, why can't it be used in the game, of course, this can be used in points tactics.

If the team's tactic is sailing, and they all die in the poison, will they also have to deduct points, and all those who enter the circle late and are finally poisoned will have to be deducted points?

Aren't the rules supposed to be in place before the game?

If you don't have this rule in place before the game, why do you use it to deduct points? Can you deduct it however you want? If the tournament feels that this is not good, shouldn't this rule be enacted, declared, and then take effect in the next tournament?

So Sun Yaosheng who watched this news was inexplicable, how to say that the organizer of North America is not a new manufacturer, but how could he make such a wrong judgment, which directly caused public anger, and even caused many viewers to directly give up watching this competition.

The audience is the source of the game, and if there is no audience to watch the game, what is the point, there is no such thing at all!

"The explanation of the competition side is also very strange, there is no e-sports spirit, what is the e-sports spirit, do they understand?" Zhu Xiaofei said with ridicule, "The spirit of e-sports is to win, to win the first place!" Their approach is to not give points to the opposite side, knowing that they have no way to 1V4, do they insist on going up to send someone to the head to call the spirit of e-sports? ”

"The spirit of bullshit e-sports, this is 15 points less than thunder, this is a tactic. Do you have to give points to be considered a competitive spirit? This organizer has a problem with his brain, and the rules are not explained to deduct points? There were people who were knocked down and electrocuted to death in the poison before, and points will also be deducted? Or did they specifically target us Chinese players? Zong Kai said very unhappily.

(End of chapter)