Thank you for the reward of "Thief Death" and "Qingqing Little Wolf"! ――

Bielsa looked more restless than before, pondering how to equalise.

The game was only played for 25 minutes.

He couldn't have made a substitution, but Veron had a terrible appearance.

3313.

This 1 alone is the most important.

Bielsa bet on Veron, Aimar and gave up Riquelme, although Riquelme, who has a slower pace, may not be too good even on the field.

Because the England team is shameless, yes, in Bielsa's eyes, the England team is shameless.

Throwing away the dignity of the originator of modern football, the game was not played, and the momentum was three points weaker, because they took the initiative to retreat and do the dense defense that usually only the weak team would put on.

Veron is Bart in front of him, and Scholes in the back, all of whom are his teammates at Manchester United, and he is restricted to do nothing in a narrow range, which is why Argentina plays back and forth and can only turn in circles on the side.

By the time Bielsa crouched down to think about a change, Aldridge had already celebrated with the coaching staff and the players.

At this time, he was still standing on the sidelines with his hands behind his back, standing on the sidelines with his head held high, not moving.

In this duel between Bielsa and Aldridge, judging from the body movements of the two coaches on the sidelines, Bielsa is even more anxious, and Aldridge. has a scheming flavor that doesn't match his appearance.

Martin Taylor. Andy Gray. And Lineker has begun to reminisce about the goal just now, and the number one star Beckham has naturally received a lot of appreciation, they think that Beckham scored the first goal in the face of Argentina, an extremely crucial goal, representing Becky's revenge, Beckham got up again where he fell.

"Gary, what do you mean when you said it reminds me of the '74 World Cup final?"

'I saw Ashley Cole's movement. And his assist to David, this scene is very shocking, I think of the classic 74 final, of course, England is like Germany, and Argentina, but not like the Netherlands, they are much weaker than the Netherlands. ”

"Why?"

"Because Ashley Cole, he"

The eloquence is good, and Lineker, who is witty in the commentary, can't go on when he talks about this. Because he doesn't know how to describe Ashley Cole's role in the offense just now.

This is a strange phenomenon.

I can't tell, I can't tell. A thousand threads, like a fish in the throat.

Argentina took the initiative to slow down the pace after the restart, to slow down the blow of losing the ball, and it can be regarded as giving Bielsa time to adapt on the spot, 25 minutes, it is obvious to everyone, although England put on a posture of a turtle with a shrunken head, but people can really bite people to death when they open their mouths from the turtle shell!

Like Lineker, there are many top coaches who can't articulate the subtleties of the England attack he has just witnessed.

Aldridge turned his head to look at Bielsa, who was squatting on the sidelines with a solemn expression.

Master tactician?

Whether it's a master or not, it doesn't matter.

But since you met here, you should at least have some convincing skills.

Offensive offense and offense, madman Bielsa.

It seems that the other coaches don't know how to attack.

But if you attack and attack, don't score, and are limited by the opponent with only dense defense, what if you are crazy like a demon? Don't you still be disgraced?

Holding high the banner of attack seems to be promoting the aesthetics of passionate and romantic football.

It's a bit of a scorn.

Whether you can be passionate, whether you can be romantic, it's not what the coach says!

Aldridge figured this out on the day he coached Millwall at the age of 18, and it was also summed up by his experience in his previous life and his travels and studies in this life.

Millwall started to defend against the back, 8 years later, in the face of the La Liga double-heroes, if they still play the defense and counterattack, they will definitely be able to beat the opponent without temper, but Aldridge still takes the initiative to attack and is not afraid of losing the ball, why? Because Millwall already has the capital to crush their opponents, conceding goals? What does it mean to concede a goal? I just can get more than you!

But now Argentina does not have such capital, absolutely none!

Playing Nigeria has to rely on set-pieces to break the goal, the sports battle is basically no threat except for long-range shots, and then play England, or play like this, in Aldridge's eyes, it's not that Bielsa is crazy, it's that he underestimates the world's heroes.

I, Aldrich Hall, have been brilliant for 8 years, but how can I be in vain?

In this game, Aldrich's arrangement did not seem to have changed, because the formation itself was dead and meaningless, but in terms of tactical arrangement, he pinched the opponent's seven inches.

Limiting Veron, Argentina's attack can only go to the side.

Ortega, Gonzalez, have the ability to blow up England's wide defence? Especially when England are defending intensively, in addition to Bart, there are also Becky and Frank Lampard next to them to actively help defend the wings.

Since there is none, then Sorin and Zanetti will have to assist.

After this assist, the problem that arose was that Ortega and Gonzalez were deficient in their flexibility to switch from winger to striker.

If these two are Millwall's Thierry Henry, Larsson, or Klose, Argentina will at least increase the power of the forward line several times.

Why?

Henry, Larsson, and Klose cultivated by Aldridge all have a strong sense of center pulling the wing, and the winger cutting inside, and is well versed and flexibly switched in the game, while the Argentine striker, this awareness and ability has not reached a very high level, and the threat is naturally strict, but crowded on the side, even if he runs to the middle, he just runs simply, and the passing and running coordination is not in place.

After the offense piled up on the side, when England switched from defense to attack, they focused on Argentina's side defense, and the biggest hole in Argentina's defense was here, their side midfielders all assisted, offensive football, to crush the opponent.

Thereupon. One saw the important role of McManaman. Hit the speed of the fast attack. Ensuring that England quickly pushed their attack deep enough to tear apart Argentina's third-line connection and disrupt their overall defence, the battle became partial.

McManaman's left and right pulls the side, and then creates a local pull in front of the 60-meter cross-section of the Argentine backline, and the second problem of Argentina's defense comes out, with only 3 defenders in the 60-meter lateral defensive area. It is conceivable how huge the defensive pressure is, Owen's running attraction, Scholes's tandem and forward, as long as England has one more person, whether it is Becky or Lampard, they can basically find a vacancy and immediately blow up their defense after transferring the attack.

Romantic football? Good bye!

If England hadn't been a little unlucky, they would have scored a goal a long time ago.

And when Argentina realised the weakness of their defense on the wings, did England run out of ways?

No, correspondingly. Argentina will strengthen their defense on the wings, and the pressure on England's side will decrease.

So. The ones who were released were the full-backs.

This is Aldridge's second focus on this game, the first is McManaman's position, which is very different from the last game against Sweden, and the second is Ashley Cole and Phil Neville, and the first is Ashley Cole.

Aldridge would be interested in chatting with Lineker if he could hear England commentators on the World Cup final in '74 and if he didn't command the team.

That's right, the 74 World Cup final gave birth to the most mysterious role on the football field, which can only be understood and cannot be spoken.

This role will remain on the wing for the next 30 years, and even in the future, it will be one of the decisive roles on the football field!

Wing players, in the public perception, are nothing more than three categories, fullbacks, full-backs, wingers, and can be divided into many roles according to their roles, such as assist-type fullbacks, classical wingers and the like.

The importance of the role of the winger is often epoch-making, the demise of the classical winger, the removal of England's winger and the establishment of a full-back to win the world, etc.

And the development of football to the present day, basically formed a consensus, that is, "three and a half backs", no team's four backs are the same only to undertake defensive tasks, radical teams, both fullbacks can assist, occupy the full-back position, winger position, but the general team, is not afraid to invest so much, so in the flow of the game, usually three defenders, unilateral assists, and at the same time defend to come back, that is, no matter how it changes, the main body is 3 and a half, less than half, is to participate in the attack.

For the world's first-class teams, the defense must at least ensure the iron triangle, double central defenders plus a midfielder, which not only ensures a certain horizontal defense, but also has a sense of hierarchy, like the future Real Madrid with a seemingly good back line but the back waist is useless and has no level to let the opponent impact, it is not surprising that the defense is bad, which is against the trend of football tactical development.

In the case of ensuring the defensive iron triangle, how to arrange the players in the midfield, how to operate the offensive system, so that countless coaches racked their brains, some famous, some obscure, when the development to the extreme, the role of the fullback began to be gradually valued, from the 58 World Cup, the assist fullback has been on the highest stage in the world, popular, popular, development, it seems that there is no secret at all.

Came to the 74 World Cup, at that time, the Netherlands shocked the world, how fierce was the Dutch attack? 5 wins, 1 draw, only conceded 1 goal to advance to the final, defeated the South American three heroes without conceding a goal, and averaged more than 20 shots per game! Playing Sweden, 36 shots on goal, playing Argentina, crazy 40 shots on goal! With the input of this crazy attack, they only conceded one goal, which is the peak of attack and defense.

The final was held in Munich, the West German team faced the Netherlands, no one was not afraid of the Dutch team, and the West German team was no exception, they were thinking hard about how to beat the Netherlands, at this time, Clameyer, a person who had a fundamental influence on the German Emperor Beckenbauer's free man thinking, recommended a set of technical and tactical play to the West German team, specifically to restrain the Dutch team's full attack and defense, to put it bluntly, is to seize the opportunity on the basis of finding flaws.

In the game, Bonhoff, who appeared to be a full-back, was a one-sided take-all and had a chance to cross the baseline in a sprint of more than 40 meters, which led to the winning goal scored by Muller.

That game gave the Netherlands the uncrowned champions, they were crazy and didn't win the title.

The German team has also brought new tactical ideas to modern football, using wide players. It was as if a barrier had been shattered.

A whole new kind of character is born. But there is no precise definition. Because this kind of role is on the wing, sometimes like a defender, sometimes like a striker, there is no fixed position, there is no fixed area of activity, in Europe, most people call this role "change forward", and the Italians name it "turning winger". The Argentines call it a "blower".

Why is this kind of role only understandable and unspeakable? Because you can't describe the exact position of the field to define the name of the field, count the names of the various positions on the field, whether it is a backward organization, a number nine and a half, a strike striker, a pillar center, a full-back, etc., this has a big frame or a three-dimensional depiction, but this character, no.

Why is this character mysterious?

Because most of the managers can't describe it clearly. To deal with the outside world, it is very formulaic to say some cliché positions, but the reporter is not willing to write about it. Because the reader will think that he is fooling people, like Cruyff will privately tell the reporter that he is playing in a 312211 formation, but will the reporter write this in the newspaper? If it is really written, readers will only laugh at the journalist as an idiot.

It's like some teams start with 451, but when defending, the last line of defense, you will find that there are 6 people in a line, is this a 4-back formation?

This "change of striker" has become an invisible but vital force in the tactical contest in football, and after 74 years, there are teams that want to emulate, such as Brazil, but they have not been able to do so at the cost of 10 years of defeat.

It's too hard, you can't develop players like this full-time, because it's going to be a double-edged sword, and if you don't get it right, you're going to destroy the whole tactical system, and because it's not going to be mainstream, there's no team going to focus on building players like that.

England's goal, from start to finish, was assisted by Ashley Cole and then provided the assist to Beckham in the midfield area.

However, if you think about it, why did he appear there? Why didn't he hold the wing to support McManaman? That's what he does as a full-back!

If Ashley Kerr does this all game, all season, and all career long, will he be a wonder man every time? Or has it become a cancer of the tactical system?

It is precisely because there are too many factors at the left and right that the "change of edge" cannot become mainstream, and only shines in certain situations.

In the past 20 years of the World Championship, whether it is the European Cup or the World Cup, this "change of front" has become an invisible force to promote the evolution of football tactics, and even some self-contained back 3 formations also originate from this.

In contemporary times, "changing the front" has always been the pursuit of top coaches, once it can be used well, it is a miracle, for example, in the last game Argentina played Nigeria, Argentina before scoring, the only shot in the penalty area, who came from? Sorin, one of his midfielders on the wing, entered the penalty area and came to the front of the striker to form a shot, but unfortunately, it was only once, which shows that Argentina is not skilled in the use of changing strikers.

In 06, when Lahm scored the first goal of the opening game of the World Cup, he won the ball from the side, and then cut inside to connect the two, and completed a long-range shot in a forward and winger area, the same World Cup, the magical Grosso, in the case of Italy facing Australia with one less player, killed without hesitation, took the ball in the winger area, began to do the work of a striker, and finally tripped Neil after passing a man in the penalty area, he was no more than 10 yards away from the goal, under normal circumstances, it can be said that the player has a flash of inspiration, But think about it carefully, in the World Cup, one less player, at the last moment of the game, Italy has to rely on a fullback to rush up to do the work of a striker, is Grosso playing chicken blood, or is Lippi scheming to use the essence of changing the striker to the extreme? On the contrary, without Lippi's nod, give Grosso 10,000 guts, he dares to rush forward? And don't pass the ball to the striker, do it yourself?

In the final analysis, the emergence of "changing the front" is a kind of compromise that football has developed to a real bottleneck, but it is impossible to pursue the highest level.

The Dutch concept that everyone can play as a striker, everyone can be converted into a defender, and what kind of responsibilities can be performed in any area where they stand, is too free, and the creation of zào is too amazing, it is simply a dream and limit, but the reality is that the player is not a god, and the player must be given a frame and a shackle in order to make a team composed of 11 players run smoothly, and 10,000 teams will pursue the highest idealized all-attack and defense, and there will only be 9,999 collapses, and the one left is called the Netherlands, The highest achievement is the runner-up of the World Cup, and the glory of an uncrowned king.

However, in the stereotyped framework, the technique and tactics will be uninspired, and the predictability will be too strong, so there is a change of forward, there is a free man who later shocked the German team, there is the rise of modern wingers, there is the emergence of a backward organization, there are all kinds of creation that can only be broken out at a certain point, a certain person, a certain position, this is a compromise between reality and ideals, but each change still has a huge impact on modern football.

Aldrich's research on the change of front, the real yàn, the use, has already begun, but because this kind of change of edge has never been the mainstream, it is not a role that can be conventionally created, so it can only be used on the spot in the appropriate game background, as the Europeans say, the change of the front, the focus is on changing, if it becomes a rigid and fixed routine, what is the meaning of changing? Where is the surprise?

He used it at Millwall, and the earliest key use can be traced back to the first year of the Champions League, when in the face of Juventus' last-minute struggle, Schneider's press, giving up the side and going inside, creating a zào opportunity, and creating the goal that blasted Millwall to beat Juventus, which came from this.

Since then, Zambrotta, Schneider, in many offensive battles, have this kind of shadow of change, because Zambrotta's body is stronger, so Zambrotta is more brilliant, which is why he can compete for the best fullback in the world, and it is also the reason why Aldridge from a long time ago, as long as the main fullback appears, he basically will not set up a fullback and a traditional winger. (To be continued......)