I think there is one thing that anyone who came out of school should know, and this thing is that money is more difficult to earn.

But there are advantages and disadvantages to knowing such a thing, and generally this benefit is for people who are more spiritually rich, and I mean if a person is more spiritually rich.

He will know that this money is more difficult to earn, so he will change his way of thinking, try to save money, and then try to make as much money as possible.

But for someone who isn't particularly open-minded, maybe that's a disadvantage, and I mean it's still easy to be fooled.

As for why it is easy to be deceived by others, there must be a very big reason, and this very big reason comes from the fact that he thinks that this money is more difficult to earn, so he wants more money.

But because the breadth of this idea is not so broad, he listened to some slander, so he chose some more extreme ways.

In other words, such people are relatively easy to deceive, and I think that kind of propaganda is mainly for them.

Therefore, it is not a bad thing for us normal people to have a broad vision of our minds.

But the easiest way to broaden your horizons is to read a book, which may be the most complicated method for many people.

But of course, there are other ways.

The ancients have already said other methods, generally speaking, either read thousands of books, or travel thousands of miles.

But there is a saying that is better, if you don't have enough knowledge, you can travel thousands of miles at most to be a postman.

Therefore, this should have a certain relationship with theory and practice.

What I mean by this is that if you just practice and don't have a theoretical basis, then the practice may not have much significance.

The reverse is also true, if there is no practice, it seems that theory really does not mean much.

I'm not saying that I have a high breadth of thought, but I also know that it's hard to make money these days, and I've known this since the beginning.

Of course, there are some people in my hometown who have a very high salary, reaching more than five figures, and such people are not particularly few.

But as far as most people are concerned, as I said before, I actually think that most people are just a screw in this kind of society.

In fact, I have read this book on a brief history of mankind for a long time, and it is full of ideas, or one that seems to be more correct, that is, that overall progress must be accompanied by individual suffering.

I remember that I also said my opinion, and I didn't mean that it was necessarily correct, I just said that it was a thing.

I think it's true in a way that I'm a person who doesn't like to talk more full, because it seems like I'm a little immature.

In the past, I always said a lot of words, but in the end, I found that many practices or ideas were not correct.

It's not that it's completely incorrect, it's because I'm talking too absolutely, so it's really not that correct to say this.

But as far as this matter is concerned, in fact, there is definitely a very strong point of view in my heart, and I mean that I still have a relatively high degree of agreement with this point of view.

Ah, I'll give you an example, one from this book to be exact.

It's now the norm to work overtime, which means that there are a lot of people in my hometown who work 12 hours a day, and they work about 6 days a week.

So in this matter, this is relative to the most primitive human being, that is, Homo sapiens, and in some way it is not given to others.

As for why it's not as good as others.

Let's just talk about one thing, if these primitive humans want to obtain the material of daily life, they only need about 3~4 hours.

This sentence is not what I said, it is said in this book, and the rest of the time is basically just chatting and looking at the scenery every day.

Of course, the spiritual civilization life at that time was definitely not as good as it is now, and that was because the overtime hours now are too long, and I think this spiritual civilization life should also be implemented somewhere.

The main thing is to play with the mobile phone, if the overtime is relatively long, maybe you can't even play the mobile phone.

In other words, this spiritual civilization life actually does not have much effect.

Another problem is that people's lives are not short, although the average life expectancy is relatively short, but that is because of premature death.

For most people, the children they give birth to are likely to be defective, so there is no way for such a defective child to live in this society.

Another thing is that it is easy to get some minor diseases, and the examples of some minor illnesses can pass away directly are not particularly rare.

So they were abandoned by natural selection.

Of course, this is a relatively normal thing, according to my biology in junior high school or high school, it is natural selection.

But when these human beings gradually developed into an agrarian society, it was different, and the difference was that they had some weaker people who might be able to survive through this agrarian society.

There must have been some progress in agrarian societies relative to this hunting society, but this progress was certainly accompanied by individual suffering.

Originally, when they were hunting, they ate both meat and vegetarian food, and there were many, many delicious foods, but after the development of an agricultural society, they even said that life would become worse and they would work longer hours a day.

This is similar to these white-collar workers who are working overtime now, so this matter seems a little delicate.

Where is the source of an individual's suffering?

Although it is not mentioned in this book, I think it comes from the protection of the weak.

That is to say, to a certain extent, the law of natural selection may not have such a great effect on human society, and it is possible for a weak person who cannot take care of himself to live in this world.

But if he lives in this world, it will take up some manpower and material resources, so the rest of the world will reduce some of their own time.

As a result, many, many people began to slowly distribute the means of production to some of the weak, even if the means of production were relatively low, but more or less inclined in their direction.

In this case, some of the more robust subjects may feel more painful.

I don't know if that's what the book is trying to say.

But as far as I understand it, I think that's what it means, physical suffering, that is, when a population develops to a certain point.

For example, when we develop into a country, there is no way to detect the initial diseases, but they must be cured, because we now have a good heart, we have a certain status, and we can solve such things.

But there is one thing that I think I still need to keep in mind, and what I mean is that even if you can solve this problem, you will still have to pay a certain amount of means of production.

So I guess this sentence is true, and I repeat it now, and the overall progress must be accompanied by more pain for the individual.

For example, now, I really think a lot of people are starting to feel more and more miserable.

In the past, I always imagined one thing, thinking about how far humanity would be before it could conquer the earth or conquer other planets.

But now, I think that human beings are beginning to compete with genes, and the purpose of competing with genes comes from the development of society, and individuals are becoming more and more miserable and less inclined to accept the next generation, plus the education of this generation is very powerful, so it is not as easy to brainwash as before.

So in terms of this kind of thing, I think it's likely that humanity will end up committing suicide, which means it's just the beginning.

I think there is one thing that anyone who came out of school should know, and this thing is that money is more difficult to earn.

But there are advantages and disadvantages to knowing such a thing, and generally this benefit is for people who are more spiritually rich, and I mean if a person is more spiritually rich.

He will know that this money is more difficult to earn, so he will change his way of thinking, try to save money, and then try to make as much money as possible.

But for someone who isn't particularly open-minded, maybe that's a disadvantage, and I mean it's still easy to be fooled.

As for why it is easy to be deceived by others, there must be a very big reason, and this very big reason comes from the fact that he thinks that this money is more difficult to earn, so he wants more money.

But because the breadth of this idea is not so broad, he listened to some slander, so he chose some more extreme ways.

In other words, such people are relatively easy to deceive, and I think that kind of propaganda is mainly for them.

Therefore, it is not a bad thing for us normal people to have a broad vision of our minds.

But the easiest way to broaden your horizons is to read a book, which may be the most complicated method for many people.

But of course, there are other ways.

The ancients have already said other methods, generally speaking, either read thousands of books, or travel thousands of miles.

But there is a saying that is better, if you don't have enough knowledge, you can travel thousands of miles at most to be a postman.

Therefore, this should have a certain relationship with theory and practice.

What I mean by this is that if you just practice and don't have a theoretical basis, then the practice may not have much significance.

The reverse is also true, if there is no practice, it seems that theory really does not mean much.

I'm not saying that I have a high breadth of thought, but I also know that it's hard to make money these days, and I've known this since the beginning.

Of course, there are some people in my hometown who have a very high salary, reaching more than five figures, and such people are not particularly few.

But as far as most people are concerned, as I said before, I actually think that most people are just a screw in this kind of society.

In fact, I have read this book on a brief history of mankind for a long time, and it is full of ideas, or one that seems to be more correct, that is, that overall progress must be accompanied by individual suffering.

I remember that I also said my opinion, and I didn't mean that it was necessarily correct, I just said that it was a thing.

I think it's true in a way that I'm a person who doesn't like to talk more full, because it seems like I'm a little immature.

In the past, I always said a lot of words, but in the end, I found that many practices or ideas were not correct.

It's not that it's completely incorrect, it's because I'm talking too absolutely, so it's really not that correct to say this.

But as far as this matter is concerned, in fact, there is definitely a very strong point of view in my heart, and I mean that I still have a relatively high degree of agreement with this point of view.

Ah, I'll give you an example, one from this book to be exact.

It's now the norm to work overtime, which means that there are a lot of people in my hometown who work 12 hours a day, and they work about 6 days a week.

So in this matter, this is relative to the most primitive human being, that is, Homo sapiens, and in some way it is not given to others.

As for why it's not as good as others.

Let's just talk about one thing, if these primitive humans want to obtain the material of daily life, they only need about 3~4 hours.

This sentence is not what I said, it is said in this book, and the rest of the time is basically just chatting and looking at the scenery every day.

Of course, the spiritual civilization life at that time was definitely not as good as it is now, and that was because the overtime hours now are too long, and I think this spiritual civilization life should also be implemented somewhere.

The main thing is to play with the mobile phone, if the overtime is relatively long, maybe you can't even play the mobile phone.

In other words, this spiritual civilization life actually does not have much effect.

Another problem is that people's lives are not short, although the average life expectancy is relatively short, but that is because of premature death.

For most people, the children they give birth to are likely to be defective, so there is no way for such a defective child to live in this society.

Another thing is that it is easy to get some minor diseases, and the examples of some minor illnesses can pass away directly are not particularly rare.

So they were abandoned by natural selection.

Of course, this is a relatively normal thing, according to my biology in junior high school or high school, it is natural selection.

But when these human beings gradually developed into an agrarian society, it was different, and the difference was that they had some weaker people who might be able to survive through this agrarian society.

There must have been some progress in agrarian societies relative to this hunting society, but this progress was certainly accompanied by individual suffering.

Originally, when they were hunting, they ate both meat and vegetarian food, and there were many, many delicious foods, but after the development of an agricultural society, they even said that life would become worse and they would work longer hours a day.

This is similar to these white-collar workers who are working overtime now, so this matter seems a little delicate.

Where is the source of an individual's suffering?

Although it is not mentioned in this book, I think it comes from the protection of the weak.

That is to say, to a certain extent, the law of natural selection may not have such a great effect on human society, and it is possible for a weak person who cannot take care of himself to live in this world.

But if he lives in this world, it will take up some manpower and material resources, so the rest of the world will reduce some of their own time.

As a result, many, many people began to slowly distribute the means of production to some of the weak, even if the means of production were relatively low, but more or less inclined in their direction.

In this case, some of the more robust subjects may feel more painful.

I don't know if that's what the book is trying to say.

But as far as I understand it, I think that's what it means, physical suffering, that is, when a population develops to a certain point.

For example, when we develop into a country, there is no way to detect the initial diseases, but they must be cured, because we now have a good heart, we have a certain status, and we can solve such things.

But there is one thing that I think I still need to keep in mind, and what I mean is that even if you can solve this problem, you will still have to pay a certain amount of means of production.

So I guess this sentence is true, and I repeat it now, and the overall progress must be accompanied by more pain for the individual.

For example, now, I really think a lot of people are starting to feel more and more miserable.

In the past, I always imagined one thing, thinking about how far humanity would be before it could conquer the earth or conquer other planets.

But now, I think that human beings are beginning to compete with genes, and the purpose of competing with genes comes from the development of society, and individuals are becoming more and more miserable and less inclined to accept the next generation, plus the education of this generation is very powerful, so it is not as easy to brainwash as before.

So in terms of this kind of thing, I think it's likely that humanity will end up committing suicide, which means it's just the beginning.

I think there is one thing that anyone who came out of school should know, and this thing is that money is more difficult to earn.

But there are advantages and disadvantages to knowing such a thing, and generally this benefit is for people who are more spiritually rich, and I mean if a person is more spiritually rich.

He will know that this money is more difficult to earn, so he will change his way of thinking, try to save money, and then try to make as much money as possible.

But for someone who isn't particularly open-minded, maybe that's a disadvantage, and I mean it's still easy to be fooled.

As for why it is easy to be deceived by others, there must be a very big reason, and this very big reason comes from the fact that he thinks that this money is more difficult to earn, so he wants more money.

But because the breadth of this idea is not so broad, he listened to some slander, so he chose some more extreme ways.

In other words, such people are relatively easy to deceive, and I think that kind of propaganda is mainly for them.

Therefore, it is not a bad thing for us normal people to have a broad vision of our minds.

But the easiest way to broaden your horizons is to read a book, which may be the most complicated method for many people.

But of course, there are other ways.

The ancients have already said other methods, generally speaking, either read thousands of books, or travel thousands of miles.

But there is a saying that is better, if you don't have enough knowledge, you can travel thousands of miles at most to be a postman.

Therefore, this should have a certain relationship with theory and practice.

What I mean by this is that if you just practice and don't have a theoretical basis, then the practice may not have much significance.

The reverse is also true, if there is no practice, it seems that theory really does not mean much.

I'm not saying that I have a high breadth of thought, but I also know that it's hard to make money these days, and I've known this since the beginning.

Of course, there are some people in my hometown who have a very high salary, reaching more than five figures, and such people are not particularly few.

But as far as most people are concerned, as I said before, I actually think that most people are just a screw in this kind of society.

In fact, I have read this book on a brief history of mankind for a long time, and it is full of ideas, or one that seems to be more correct, that is, that overall progress must be accompanied by individual suffering.

I remember that I also said my opinion, and I didn't mean that it was necessarily correct, I just said that it was a thing.

I think it's true in a way that I'm a person who doesn't like to talk more full, because it seems like I'm a little immature.

In the past, I always said a lot of words, but in the end, I found that many practices or ideas were not correct.

It's not that it's completely incorrect, it's because I'm talking too absolutely, so it's really not that correct to say this.

But as far as this matter is concerned, in fact, there is definitely a very strong point of view in my heart, and I mean that I still have a relatively high degree of agreement with this point of view.

Ah, I'll give you an example, one from this book to be exact.

It's now the norm to work overtime, which means that there are a lot of people in my hometown who work 12 hours a day, and they work about 6 days a week.

So in this matter, this is relative to the most primitive human being, that is, Homo sapiens, and in some way it is not given to others.

As for why it's not as good as others.

Let's just talk about one thing, if these primitive humans want to obtain the material of daily life, they only need about 3~4 hours.

This sentence is not what I said, it is said in this book, and the rest of the time is basically just chatting and looking at the scenery every day.

Of course, the spiritual civilization life at that time was definitely not as good as it is now, and that was because the overtime hours now are too long, and I think this spiritual civilization life should also be implemented somewhere.

The main thing is to play with the mobile phone, if the overtime is relatively long, maybe you can't even play the mobile phone.

In other words, this spiritual civilization life actually does not have much effect.

Another problem is that people's lives are not short, although the average life expectancy is relatively short, but that is because of premature death.

For most people, the children they give birth to are likely to be defective, so there is no way for such a defective child to live in this society.

Another thing is that it is easy to get some minor diseases, and the examples of some minor illnesses can pass away directly are not particularly rare.

So they were abandoned by natural selection.

Of course, this is a relatively normal thing, according to my biology in junior high school or high school, it is natural selection.

But when these human beings gradually developed into an agrarian society, it was different, and the difference was that they had some weaker people who might be able to survive through this agrarian society.

There must have been some progress in agrarian societies relative to this hunting society, but this progress was certainly accompanied by individual suffering.

Originally, when they were hunting, they ate both meat and vegetarian food, and there were many, many delicious foods, but after the development of an agricultural society, they even said that life would become worse and they would work longer hours a day.

This is similar to these white-collar workers who are working overtime now, so this matter seems a little delicate.

Where is the source of an individual's suffering?

Although it is not mentioned in this book, I think it comes from the protection of the weak.

That is to say, to a certain extent, the law of natural selection may not have such a great effect on human society, and it is possible for a weak person who cannot take care of himself to live in this world.

But if he lives in this world, it will take up some manpower and material resources, so the rest of the world will reduce some of their own time.

As a result, many, many people began to slowly distribute the means of production to some of the weak, even if the means of production were relatively low, but more or less inclined in their direction.

In this case, some of the more robust subjects may feel more painful.

I don't know if that's what the book is trying to say.

But as far as I understand it, I think that's what it means, physical suffering, that is, when a population develops to a certain point.

For example, when we develop into a country, there is no way to detect the initial diseases, but they must be cured, because we now have a good heart, we have a certain status, and we can solve such things.

But there is one thing that I think I still need to keep in mind, and what I mean is that even if you can solve this problem, you will still have to pay a certain amount of means of production.

So I guess this sentence is true, and I repeat it now, and the overall progress must be accompanied by more pain for the individual.

For example, now, I really think a lot of people are starting to feel more and more miserable.

In the past, I always imagined one thing, thinking about how far humanity would be before it could conquer the earth or conquer other planets.

But now, I think that human beings are beginning to compete with genes, and the purpose of competing with genes comes from the development of society, and individuals are becoming more and more miserable and less inclined to accept the next generation, plus the education of this generation is very powerful, so it is not as easy to brainwash as before.

So in terms of this kind of thing, I think it's likely that humanity will end up committing suicide, which means it's just the beginning.

I think there is one thing that anyone who came out of school should know, and this thing is that money is more difficult to earn.

But there are advantages and disadvantages to knowing such a thing, and generally this benefit is for people who are more spiritually rich, and I mean if a person is more spiritually rich.

He will know that this money is more difficult to earn, so he will change his way of thinking, try to save money, and then try to make as much money as possible.

But for someone who isn't particularly open-minded, maybe that's a disadvantage, and I mean it's still easy to be fooled.

As for why it is easy to be deceived by others, there must be a very big reason, and this very big reason comes from the fact that he thinks that this money is more difficult to earn, so he wants more money.

But because the breadth of this idea is not so broad, he listened to some slander, so he chose some more extreme ways.

In other words, such people are relatively easy to deceive, and I think that kind of propaganda is mainly for them.

Therefore, it is not a bad thing for us normal people to have a broad vision of our minds.

But the easiest way to broaden your horizons is to read a book, which may be the most complicated method for many people.

But of course, there are other ways.

The ancients have already said other methods, generally speaking, either read thousands of books, or travel thousands of miles.

But there is a saying that is better, if you don't have enough knowledge, you can travel thousands of miles at most to be a postman.

Therefore, this should have a certain relationship with theory and practice.

What I mean by this is that if you just practice and don't have a theoretical basis, then the practice may not have much significance.

The reverse is also true, if there is no practice, it seems that theory really does not mean much.

I'm not saying that I have a high breadth of thought, but I also know that it's hard to make money these days, and I've known this since the beginning.

Of course, there are some people in my hometown who have a very high salary, reaching more than five figures, and such people are not particularly few.

But as far as most people are concerned, as I said before, I actually think that most people are just a screw in this kind of society.

In fact, I have read this book on a brief history of mankind for a long time, and it is full of ideas, or one that seems to be more correct, that is, that overall progress must be accompanied by individual suffering.

I remember that I also said my opinion, and I didn't mean that it was necessarily correct, I just said that it was a thing.

I think it's true in a way that I'm a person who doesn't like to talk more full, because it seems like I'm a little immature.

In the past, I always said a lot of words, but in the end, I found that many practices or ideas were not correct.

It's not that it's completely incorrect, it's because I'm talking too absolutely, so it's really not that correct to say this.

But as far as this matter is concerned, in fact, there is definitely a very strong point of view in my heart, and I mean that I still have a relatively high degree of agreement with this point of view.

Ah, I'll give you an example, one from this book to be exact.

It's now the norm to work overtime, which means that there are a lot of people in my hometown who work 12 hours a day, and they work about 6 days a week.

So in this matter, this is relative to the most primitive human being, that is, Homo sapiens, and in some way it is not given to others.

As for why it's not as good as others.

Let's just talk about one thing, if these primitive humans want to obtain the material of daily life, they only need about 3~4 hours.

This sentence is not what I said, it is said in this book, and the rest of the time is basically just chatting and looking at the scenery every day.

Of course, the spiritual civilization life at that time was definitely not as good as it is now, and that was because the overtime hours now are too long, and I think this spiritual civilization life should also be implemented somewhere.

The main thing is to play with the mobile phone, if the overtime is relatively long, maybe you can't even play the mobile phone.

In other words, this spiritual civilization life actually does not have much effect.

Another problem is that people's lives are not short, although the average life expectancy is relatively short, but that is because of premature death.

For most people, the children they give birth to are likely to be defective, so there is no way for such a defective child to live in this society.

Another thing is that it is easy to get some minor diseases, and the examples of some minor illnesses can pass away directly are not particularly rare.

So they were abandoned by natural selection.

Of course, this is a relatively normal thing, according to my biology in junior high school or high school, it is natural selection.

But when these human beings gradually developed into an agrarian society, it was different, and the difference was that they had some weaker people who might be able to survive through this agrarian society.

There must have been some progress in agrarian societies relative to this hunting society, but this progress was certainly accompanied by individual suffering.

Originally, when they were hunting, they ate both meat and vegetarian food, and there were many, many delicious foods, but after the development of an agricultural society, they even said that life would become worse and they would work longer hours a day.

This is similar to these white-collar workers who are working overtime now, so this matter seems a little delicate.

Where is the source of an individual's suffering?

Although it is not mentioned in this book, I think it comes from the protection of the weak.

That is to say, to a certain extent, the law of natural selection may not have such a great effect on human society, and it is possible for a weak person who cannot take care of himself to live in this world.

But if he lives in this world, it will take up some manpower and material resources, so the rest of the world will reduce some of their own time.

As a result, many, many people began to slowly distribute the means of production to some of the weak, even if the means of production were relatively low, but more or less inclined in their direction.

In this case, some of the more robust subjects may feel more painful.

I don't know if that's what the book is trying to say.

But as far as I understand it, I think that's what it means, physical suffering, that is, when a population develops to a certain point.

For example, when we develop into a country, there is no way to detect the initial diseases, but they must be cured, because we now have a good heart, we have a certain status, and we can solve such things.

But there is one thing that I think I still need to keep in mind, and what I mean is that even if you can solve this problem, you will still have to pay a certain amount of means of production.

So I guess this sentence is true, and I repeat it now, and the overall progress must be accompanied by more pain for the individual.

For example, now, I really think a lot of people are starting to feel more and more miserable.

In the past, I always imagined one thing, thinking about how far humanity would be before it could conquer the earth or conquer other planets.

But now, I think that human beings are beginning to compete with genes, and the purpose of competing with genes comes from the development of society, and individuals are becoming more and more miserable and less inclined to accept the next generation, plus the education of this generation is very powerful, so it is not as easy to brainwash as before.

So in terms of this kind of thing, I think it's likely that humanity will end up committing suicide, which means it's just the beginning.