This kind of literary film actually has a bigger standard, which is quite ridiculous to say, that is, the problem of the box office, which is generally not particularly high.

It's a big part of the reason, I don't think it's because of the audience, I think a big part of the reason is probably the problem of the movie theater, as for why it's the problem of the movie theater, it's because they probably put this behind when they make the film.

Even if there is a holiday, those movie theaters will basically list large-scale movies on commercial films when scheduling films, so this situation leads to the audience choosing only a few when watching movies.

It is the same whether you buy it online or in person, which leads to some viewers not having the opportunity to watch it even if they want to, unless the fans know that the director or the actor has made such a movie and received this kind of promotional information.

I was able to know where the movie was screened, and even some places may seem to be far away from where I live or where I work, so I choose not to go to that place to see it.

I think this is one of the most important reasons, especially those movie theater chains, which feel that they have dominated the film market, and film companies like these have to cooperate with these movie theater companies and have a very good relationship, otherwise it will look quite embarrassing.

I don't blame anyone for this, and I don't know what to do when this kind of thing happens, but I don't think I should blame anyone, because opening a company or a movie theater is originally out to make money.

If people think that they don't make money, then I definitely won't arrange it, and the long-term data makes them think that there are very few people who watch literary films.

In fact, there are not many people who make literary films now, and directors will still take making money as their main task, after all, there are not many directors who pay for themselves, and most directors still undertake a task of making movies.

When they have no way to pay, that is, when they have no right to speak, in fact, no matter who is in this world, even if it is family affection, even if it is between father and son, it is basically this problem.

It is who pays and who has the right to speak.

If someone says that in fact, family relationships should not be so vulgar, but just give an example.

If it is according to the past, in fact, this does not need to be according to the past, and the problem can be explained now, that is, if a man gets married, he needs the bride price, because his current job may be just starting.

There wasn't much money, and after giving him the money at this time, he later completed it.

At this time, there is a involvement, at this time, if the parents let them have a child, even if they don't want it, but when they talk about it, their waist may not be so hard.

Isn't it true that this relationship is not normal? But in fact, if the thinking of the two generations is different, if there is no financial involvement, the waist is still relatively hard when speaking.

It's not that the waist pole must be stiffer when speaking, I'm just saying that there is such an example, no matter what it is, it is such an example, most of the time money can dominate, and there should not be too many objections to this.

I'm talking about most cases, not all cases.

But in fact, 90% of the world's things can be solved with money, and young people prefer to be simple and direct, so there are so many things in this world that can be solved with money.

Money can solve the problem of destroying our three views, but there is no way, when all human beings agree with the concept of money, then this thing is established, which is equivalent to a person who had a lot of prey in ancient times.

It's all in his hole, and then there may be mating rights at this time, among other races.

This thing may sound like a bit great, but if it were up to now, maybe this thing would seem to us to be something that ruined the three views.

When the director is filming, I think there will be a lot of such situations, for example, some people who don't know how to film at all have to shoot this scene like this, point fingers, and finally shoot something nondescript.

Sometimes we scold the director, but I really understand that many cases are a situation of carrying a black pot, many and many situations, but since they are making money, sometimes it is natural to carry the black pot.

originally made so much money, and as a public figure, he must be involved in this aspect.

To say that as a public figure, it is impossible to let yourself not have any scolding, although the law protects human rights, but if celebrities spend a lot of time every day to protect their rights and interests, then there may not be so much time to make money.

So this kind of thing still needs to be looked at a little bit more, as for how we should do it, I think the first point is that we don't have too many comments on some things that we don't know much about, whether it's positive or negative, there are a lot of things that we don't understand at all.

Don't say anything about the authorities, the bystanders are clear, in fact, we didn't know about this situation at the time, plus the star is a packaged thing, and what we usually know about the star is what we know about the package.

So we think that their character in front of the screen is their real character, which must be very wrong, and it is not common sense in the first place.

The stars in front of the screen seem to be a flawless character, whether it is their character or their appearance, but there are no such perfect characters in the world, I dare say that when the shortcomings are displayed in front of our eyes, in fact, many of us can't stand it.

The level of expectation has changed so much.

So for the director should be like this, if a relatively bad film is made, then we can completely say where the film is bad, don't say that the director is stupid, and even involve family problems.

This is indeed a person who feels like the reviewer has some character problems.

There is also the problem of stars, stars can basically be used as a guidepost for us to move forward, but don't hold out too much hope, this kind of thing is originally an illusory thing, choose the good ones and follow them, and change the bad ones.

In fact, it's a very simple thing, and I hope that we can create a good environment, so that we can see a better film.

This kind of literary film actually has a bigger standard, which is quite ridiculous to say, that is, the problem of the box office, which is generally not particularly high.

It's a big part of the reason, I don't think it's because of the audience, I think a big part of the reason is probably the problem of the movie theater, as for why it's the problem of the movie theater, it's because they probably put this behind when they make the film.

Even if there is a holiday, those movie theaters will basically list large-scale movies on commercial films when scheduling films, so this situation leads to the audience choosing only a few when watching movies.

It is the same whether you buy it online or in person, which leads to some viewers not having the opportunity to watch it even if they want to, unless the fans know that the director or the actor has made such a movie and received this kind of promotional information.

I was able to know where the movie was screened, and even some places may seem to be far away from where I live or where I work, so I choose not to go to that place to see it.

I think this is one of the most important reasons, especially those movie theater chains, which feel that they have dominated the film market, and film companies like these have to cooperate with these movie theater companies and have a very good relationship, otherwise it will look quite embarrassing.

I don't blame anyone for this, and I don't know what to do when this kind of thing happens, but I don't think I should blame anyone, because opening a company or a movie theater is originally out to make money.

If people think that they don't make money, then I definitely won't arrange it, and the long-term data makes them think that there are very few people who watch literary films.

In fact, there are not many people who make literary films now, and directors will still take making money as their main task, after all, there are not many directors who pay for themselves, and most directors still undertake a task of making movies.

When they have no way to pay, that is, when they have no right to speak, in fact, no matter who is in this world, even if it is family affection, even if it is between father and son, it is basically this problem.

It is who pays and who has the right to speak.

If someone says that in fact, family relationships should not be so vulgar, but just give an example.

If it is according to the past, in fact, this does not need to be according to the past, and the problem can be explained now, that is, if a man gets married, he needs the bride price, because his current job may be just starting.

There wasn't much money, and after giving him the money at this time, he later completed it.

At this time, there is a involvement, at this time, if the parents let them have a child, even if they don't want it, but when they talk about it, their waist may not be so hard.

Isn't it true that this relationship is not normal? But in fact, if the thinking of the two generations is different, if there is no financial involvement, the waist is still relatively hard when speaking.

It's not that the waist pole must be stiffer when speaking, I'm just saying that there is such an example, no matter what it is, it is such an example, most of the time money can dominate, and there should not be too many objections to this.

I'm talking about most cases, not all cases.

But in fact, 90% of the world's things can be solved with money, and young people prefer to be simple and direct, so there are so many things in this world that can be solved with money.

Money can solve the problem of destroying our three views, but there is no way, when all human beings agree with the concept of money, then this thing is established, which is equivalent to a person who had a lot of prey in ancient times.

It's all in his hole, and then there may be mating rights at this time, among other races.

This thing may sound like a bit great, but if it were up to now, maybe this thing would seem to us to be something that ruined the three views.

When the director is filming, I think there will be a lot of such situations, for example, some people who don't know how to film at all have to shoot this scene like this, point fingers, and finally shoot something nondescript.

Sometimes we scold the director, but I really understand that many cases are a situation of carrying a black pot, many and many situations, but since they are making money, sometimes it is natural to carry the black pot.

originally made so much money, and as a public figure, he must be involved in this aspect.

To say that as a public figure, it is impossible to let yourself not have any scolding, although the law protects human rights, but if celebrities spend a lot of time every day to protect their rights and interests, then there may not be so much time to make money.

So this kind of thing still needs to be looked at a little bit more, as for how we should do it, I think the first point is that we don't have too many comments on some things that we don't know much about, whether it's positive or negative, there are a lot of things that we don't understand at all.

Don't say anything about the authorities, the bystanders are clear, in fact, we didn't know about this situation at the time, plus the star is a packaged thing, and what we usually know about the star is what we know about the package.

So we think that their character in front of the screen is their real character, which must be very wrong, and it is not common sense in the first place.

The stars in front of the screen seem to be a flawless character, whether it is their character or their appearance, but there are no such perfect characters in the world, I dare say that when the shortcomings are displayed in front of our eyes, in fact, many of us can't stand it.

The level of expectation has changed so much.

So for the director should be like this, if a relatively bad film is made, then we can completely say where the film is bad, don't say that the director is stupid, and even involve family problems.

This is indeed a person who feels like the reviewer has some character problems.

There is also the problem of stars, stars can basically be used as a guidepost for us to move forward, but don't hold out too much hope, this kind of thing is originally an illusory thing, choose the good ones and follow them, and change the bad ones.

In fact, it's a very simple thing, and I hope that we can create a good environment, so that we can see a better film.

This kind of literary film actually has a bigger standard, which is quite ridiculous to say, that is, the problem of the box office, which is generally not particularly high.

It's a big part of the reason, I don't think it's because of the audience, I think a big part of the reason is probably the problem of the movie theater, as for why it's the problem of the movie theater, it's because they probably put this behind when they make the film.

Even if there is a holiday, those movie theaters will basically list large-scale movies on commercial films when scheduling films, so this situation leads to the audience choosing only a few when watching movies.

It is the same whether you buy it online or in person, which leads to some viewers not having the opportunity to watch it even if they want to, unless the fans know that the director or the actor has made such a movie and received this kind of promotional information.

I was able to know where the movie was screened, and even some places may seem to be far away from where I live or where I work, so I choose not to go to that place to see it.

I think this is one of the most important reasons, especially those movie theater chains, which feel that they have dominated the film market, and film companies like these have to cooperate with these movie theater companies and have a very good relationship, otherwise it will look quite embarrassing.

I don't blame anyone for this, and I don't know what to do when this kind of thing happens, but I don't think I should blame anyone, because opening a company or a movie theater is originally out to make money.

If people think that they don't make money, then I definitely won't arrange it, and the long-term data makes them think that there are very few people who watch literary films.

In fact, there are not many people who make literary films now, and directors will still take making money as their main task, after all, there are not many directors who pay for themselves, and most directors still undertake a task of making movies.

When they have no way to pay, that is, when they have no right to speak, in fact, no matter who is in this world, even if it is family affection, even if it is between father and son, it is basically this problem.

It is who pays and who has the right to speak.

If someone says that in fact, family relationships should not be so vulgar, but just give an example.

If it is according to the past, in fact, this does not need to be according to the past, and the problem can be explained now, that is, if a man gets married, he needs the bride price, because his current job may be just starting.

There wasn't much money, and after giving him the money at this time, he later completed it.

At this time, there is a involvement, at this time, if the parents let them have a child, even if they don't want it, but when they talk about it, their waist may not be so hard.

Isn't it true that this relationship is not normal? But in fact, if the thinking of the two generations is different, if there is no financial involvement, the waist is still relatively hard when speaking.

It's not that the waist pole must be stiffer when speaking, I'm just saying that there is such an example, no matter what it is, it is such an example, most of the time money can dominate, and there should not be too many objections to this.

I'm talking about most cases, not all cases.

But in fact, 90% of the world's things can be solved with money, and young people prefer to be simple and direct, so there are so many things in this world that can be solved with money.

Money can solve the problem of destroying our three views, but there is no way, when all human beings agree with the concept of money, then this thing is established, which is equivalent to a person who had a lot of prey in ancient times.

It's all in his hole, and then there may be mating rights at this time, among other races.

This thing may sound like a bit great, but if it were up to now, maybe this thing would seem to us to be something that ruined the three views.

When the director is filming, I think there will be a lot of such situations, for example, some people who don't know how to film at all have to shoot this scene like this, point fingers, and finally shoot something nondescript.

Sometimes we scold the director, but I really understand that many cases are a situation of carrying a black pot, many and many situations, but since they are making money, sometimes it is natural to carry the black pot.

originally made so much money, and as a public figure, he must be involved in this aspect.

To say that as a public figure, it is impossible to let yourself not have any scolding, although the law protects human rights, but if celebrities spend a lot of time every day to protect their rights and interests, then there may not be so much time to make money.

So this kind of thing still needs to be looked at a little bit more, as for how we should do it, I think the first point is that we don't have too many comments on some things that we don't know much about, whether it's positive or negative, there are a lot of things that we don't understand at all.

Don't say anything about the authorities, the bystanders are clear, in fact, we didn't know about this situation at the time, plus the star is a packaged thing, and what we usually know about the star is what we know about the package.

So we think that their character in front of the screen is their real character, which must be very wrong, and it is not common sense in the first place.

The stars in front of the screen seem to be a flawless character, whether it is their character or their appearance, but there are no such perfect characters in the world, I dare say that when the shortcomings are displayed in front of our eyes, in fact, many of us can't stand it.

The level of expectation has changed so much.

So for the director should be like this, if a relatively bad film is made, then we can completely say where the film is bad, don't say that the director is stupid, and even involve family problems.

This is indeed a person who feels like the reviewer has some character problems.

There is also the problem of stars, stars can basically be used as a guidepost for us to move forward, but don't hold out too much hope, this kind of thing is originally an illusory thing, choose the good ones and follow them, and change the bad ones.

In fact, it's a very simple thing, and I hope that we can create a good environment, so that we can see a better film.