What I'm talking about is true, of course, I think the blind boy has also had a boyfriend, and it seems to be a recent thing, I don't think I have been away from her for long?

How did it start so quickly, and then end so quickly, I remember as if the days when I didn't see her were in the days of the Chinese New Year.

Could it be said? Is it so fast?

Impossible, right? This time seems to be a honeymoon period, or does it seem a bit outdated for me as a modern young person?

Could it be that a month is a long time for fanatical young people, or am I really a little out of fashion?

I'm not particularly sleepy after drinking, although I'm not a person who can drink very much, but I found that after such a long time, I have been exercising for a long time, and I don't feel particularly bad after drinking a little alcohol.

It's just that one thing I've found out is that I can't sleep now probably because of another reason, I feel uncomfortable in a bed with her, and I always feel as if there is a man with a luo body by my side.

To be honest, this feeling seems to be really scary, especially after turning off the lights, once it gets dark, some thoughts come with me.

And this kind of thinking doesn't mean that if you don't think about it, you can't really do it, if people can really control their thoughts, if there aren't so many bizarre things in the world.

Because once people can control their own character, or control their thoughts, many things will become very dull, because things are very dull, but many things are processed by the brain.

I understand this very well.

For example, I think that one of my grade exams was 100 years old, which is okay, but I was second in my class.

But the first place in my class was the first in the whole grade, in fact, it was strange at the time, I remember that the student in front of me was indeed better than me, but my classmate was the first in the whole grade at that time.

What I mean by this sentence is that there is probably a suspicion of cheating that time, and I seem to be a little jealous of others when I say this, so I am definitely not jealous of others, this is just a perfect way to talk about this matter.

In order to make my mom a little happier, I said that I was second in the class, but the first place in our class was the first place in the whole school.

This sentence sounds better when you say it, it is much better than a hundred years away from the whole grade, and I believe most people know the difference between these two statements.

I am not exaggerating in this statement, that is to say, when I speak, it is a normal tone, and I am not exaggerating about this matter, but I am just describing it from another side.

But when this thing came to my mother's mouth, it completely changed its taste, and I began to brag to others, especially my mother's relatives and friends, saying that our Xiaoyan actually did very well in the exam this time, and it was in the top few of the whole grade, in fact, it was the first in the class, but our Xiaoyan was not very lucky, and the first in the whole grade was also in her class.

So this time I only won the second place in the class, which made me very embarrassed, how do I feel that I didn't do so well.

In fact, when I heard this boast, I regretted it a little to tell the truth, and the reason for the regret didn't need to be said more, it was better to tell the truth at the time, and now my face is a little red when I brag, how did I do such a thing.

God, earth, if I made a place like this, it would be good.

Although our school is not the top school in the city, it is also home to a lot of top students in the neighborhood, so it is actually a normal thing for me to be able to get about 100 students, which may not be particularly good but not particularly bad.

What I mean by this is that even if I tell the truth, I won't be punished, and of course I won't be rewarded, which is the mean.

But it completely changed the taste in my mother's mouth, and the next thing I couldn't help but develop, and it went far beyond my expectations.

My relatives and friends began to say to others, "Oh, what is our family called, what is it called, and which key school is the second in the whole grade, and we must be a great talent in the future."

And then the next thing is to spread more and more, but the version is also getting more and more outrageous, our family who who who relatives in what and what in our best school here took the first place in the whole grade.

Originally, I was able to tolerate this little thing because it was just a change in ranking, but since I heard that even this school has changed, I decided not to brag to my mother again, which is very uncomfortable.

This means that people can't control their thoughts, especially in this dark night, and I can't control my imagination.

When I talk about imagination, I think I studied a philosophy in college that was very difficult for me to understand.

Of course, it was very difficult to understand at first, but when I came across this word, I wanted to refute it on the spot.

Or maybe it's this sentence, but this philosophy is said like this, people can't imagine things that they haven't seen.

When I heard this, I immediately wanted to refute it, as if it was a false philosophy, but I didn't think about why it was in a textbook.

Since he appears in the textbook, does it mean that he has a certain truth, and since he has a certain amount of truth, should I consider the truth it itself when I refute it?

But at that time, I didn't think about it, and I began to refute him in my heart, and some of our classmates were also very eager to refute this sentence directly.

At that time, their rebuttals seemed very reasonable to me, but now they seem to be very stupid.

Because we didn't have the strength to understand this sentence at the time, we began to refute it directly, and it is definitely not possible to do so, in other words, it is actually easier for others to laugh at us.

Therefore, when people refute a point of view, they must be calm, they must be calm and calm, don't feel that what they think is right immediately, think about where their contradictions are, and refute them if there are no contradictions, or that there are relatively few contradictions.

When that sentence came out, I was dismissive, and I thought to myself, aren't ghosts something that people imagine? But have people ever seen ghosts?

Haven't seen a ghost before, have you? So why are we still able to imagine it?

Of course, this statement was just an idea at the time, but when I think about it now, I can look at it from an objective point of view, and I also think that this statement is very correct.

There is a deep reason for this, in fact, ghosts are also things that people have seen, but many kinds of things that have been seen are put together to form a kind of thing that people imagine.

My classmates said at the time that Journey to the West was not a thing we imagined.

But I actually think that this sentence is just that I didn't say it, and I think this thing is something that we imagined, to be precise, something that some of our artists imagined before.

But I now understand that those things are just the things that some of our original artists have processed, or that this person has seen a relatively large world, so he can know more things.

That is to say, these things are actually the same as what he has seen, and he has put these things together after seeing them, and now it cannot be said that this person's imagination is at this time, in other words, it should be said that this person has some ability to put together.

There is a book that says that one thing is very extreme, that is, there is no such thing as imagination, and all the things that people can create are not obtained through imagination.

There is a reason for this extreme idea, and to be honest, I agree with it in a certain way now, and I will definitely disagree with it then, because I don't think people are incapable of imagination.

But now I suddenly feel that this thing seems to be correct in some way, and I suddenly feel that some of the things that people create are traceable in real life.

What Lu Xun said is actually a very intriguing thing, that is, thinking and answering this philosophy, what kind of thing is the specific words.

Our great Mr. Lu Xun said that in fact, those so-called gods and ghosts are all things that we can see and piece together in real life.

Of course, that's not what I said, I forgot what the original words were, what I said was a general meaning, and I think I expressed it quite clearly.

But I didn't think of this place at that time, and sometimes I didn't think of this place of imagination, I still think that people have imagination, and the existence of people's imagination is the source of people's progress.

But in the end, I did finally find one thing, like any example of disproving the idea, that is, disproving the idea.

Whether it's some literary works, or some cultural knowledge, there are other messy things, and even language and writing have been cited.

At that time, without exception, they were directly refuted, and their appearance of these things was originally confirmed to a certain extent.

I remember my high school teacher talking to me about materialism and idealism.

Because the education we received at that time made us feel that the human mind cannot determine the existence of objects.

At that time, our teacher said that there were two schools of thought, one is idealism and the other is materialism, of course, this statement is to make us understand it well, or to make us have a certain interest in this matter.

Let's just say that this simple statement is divided into two kinds, one is idealism and the other is materialism.

At that time, when we talked about the definition of idealism, it was a very simple definition, and our teacher said that if we don't know that there is a high school next to us, then this high school still exists.

The first reaction of all of us is that this high school definitely still exists, because neither we know nor do we know that this high school exists.

Of course, the teacher will not say that, but if the teacher tells us the understanding of idealism, it does not exist, because because we don't know that this thing exists, then it doesn't exist.

It didn't take long for our class to be messed up, and our class was a mess for all our students, because at that time our students all refuted this point of view, saying what kind of relationship it had with us.

This thing has nothing to do with us, so this theory is a wrong theory.

I felt that the teacher suddenly regretted telling us about it, because it was really wrong, but he told us about it just to remind us of some interest.

It was to make his lessons more lively, but now that the students who were asleep were all up and participating in the struggle, that is to say, it was too lively.

The teacher is already out of control of the situation, of course, this idea must be a wrong thing, and the teacher gave an example that is a bit not too extensive, because idealism is also divided into many kinds.

But I didn't really understand this until I went to university, because we live in such a material society, and we must use materialism as the benchmark.

That is to say, the circumstances in which we live shape our thoughts, and if we had been born in ancient times, we might have taken this idealism as the truth, because in some ways it does explain a certain state of the environment at that time.

And we are in such an environmental situation, who can guarantee that we can 100% jump out of this situation?

Going back to the question of imagination, this is a question that the university teacher talked to us about, which is to verify the creativity of some plays.

When all those plots with science fiction overtones, she actually has certain limitations in expressing a problem, and it always makes people feel that the degree of science fiction is very deep, which people have never seen and thought before.

But the teacher has been instilling in us the idea that this kind of thing is not worth mentioning at all, and if you want to do it sincerely, you can do it.

In fact, one of the ideas that the teacher wants to express is not to make us think that some film and television works or some works of art are very, very powerful things, and I don't want us to feel that this kind of thing is unattainable.

The ultimate goal is actually to let us go and perform or create as much as possible, and the teacher is still very correct about our thoughts, or the guidance of our thoughts is still very correct.

As for whether we really accepted the painstaking efforts of the teacher, it is unknown.

At that time, the teacher just talked about such a philosophical question to provoke us to think about our own abilities, but it was the same as my high school teacher, that is, I did have a good idea, but in the end the class began to be a mess.

In the end, the teacher directly told us this conclusion, a very absolute conclusion in a book, this conclusion is that all the things we have now exist and are not imagined by us!

Whether it's a work of art or a rocket, he's supposed to be piecing together something we already know!

No matter what ET aliens say, or Journey to the West, or what messy monsters are all imagined on top of what we know.

STAR MAN IS ESSENTIALLY A PERSON, PEOPLE THROUGH THE PATCHWORK OF SOME CHARACTERISTICS OF PEOPLE, PLUS SOME TECHNOLOGY PATCHWORK, TO GET SUCH AN IMAGE OF THE CHARACTER, TO OBTAIN CAN BE SAID TO BE AN IMAGE OF ALIENS, BUT HE IS DEFINITELY NOT WHAT WE HAVE NOT SEEN OR WE IMAGINED.

Then we took all kinds of examples, for example, a ghost, but in a certain image, the ghost is also characterized by people, or the characteristics of some people.

Other words include wind factors, some technological factors, plus some other biological factors, and when these factors are combined, they are a piece of things.

This thing is still something we have seen, and our classmate also married the example of Sun Monkey.

In fact, the example of Sun Monkey is even more needless to say, there are monkeys in real life, and there are people in real life, which means that this example is actually very simple.

Anyway, in the end, the class finally quieted down, but there are still many people who can't be quiet, because they still have a lot of examples in their hearts that they want to take out, but they don't have this opportunity in time.

There is also the fact that the teacher is really going to cry, and it took a long time to explain this problem, but the main problem was not spoken.

I didn't finish the explanation until the end of class, and I must regret meeting a group of students like us, especially when I met a group of students like us.

But one thing that is a pity is that I have never entered into an in-depth study of this idea, or I have not thought about it through other literature, but I have been drilling in the way that I have used the tip of my horns, and I have tortured myself to death anyway.

But I've only recently come to understand it, and the reason for this understanding is because I saw this question in one place, and when I went in to read some comments, I also saw those questions that we had asked before.

It's just like our classmates at the time came up with some stupid counterexamples, of course, I'm not saying that we had to understand this problem at that time, and the teacher had to explain this problem clearly.

I'm just saying that it's not a good thing for us to do this, and the main reason is that I thought I was stupid at the time, and now I'm going to dig into it.

There seems to be a self-contradiction when this question is discussed, so I also confused myself, and finally I only made sure that in some ways people are really unimaginative.

Or this imagination can be broken down into two aspects, the first is our ability to access information and its ability to piece together information.

Together, these two abilities are called imagination.

Now my imagination is very rich, which means that I can't control my mind now, and of course my imagination here is that I imagine something that I can see in real life.

For example, Luo Nan, I've been imagining this thing next to me, so I'm very uncomfortable, and I can't sleep after saying that.

Man is a very strange animal, and this strangeness is actually similar to some computer bugs.

It seems that the calculation is based on the original operation method, but the final result of the calculation is wrong.

Or maybe I don't know where the error is, for example, right now, I've always wanted to make my calculations come out of the blind boy next to me.

But the final calculation results never went according to my idea, and finally came to the conclusion that there was a luo man next to me, and fortunately I didn't fall into an endless loop, otherwise my brain might have been scrapped again.

I'm not particularly interested in computers, but I'm interested in the capacity of the human brain or how much memory it has.

In other words, can these running memories of people be converted into two g running memory and 4 g running memory on our mobile phones, and can they be converted into how many g and how many g of our total memory described on our mobile phones.

In fact, I found that there are really some great gods on some of the questions, and these great gods finally explained a * to convince us.

However, there are many people who have different opinions on this kind of thing, some people say that the brain's running memory is very scum, unstable and easy to make mistakes, and it is easy to get stuck if it can't do the same job of multiple things.

Although I don't know exactly what some of the great gods mean by the word stuck, I think these two words don't seem to be a particularly good thing for our brains.

But some people have stepped up, you fart! The brain has a high running memory, and the brain is one of the lowest energy computing devices in the world.

If you can find a computer that consumes less energy per unit than your brain, I'm going to die right now!

The words of this great god are not absolute, but if you think about it carefully, it seems to be like this, how much energy do you say this brain consumes?

Even if we were able to digest all the food we ate and allow our brains to do its work, the energy consumption per unit would not be particularly large.

But compared to the computer is different, the lowest energy consumption of the computer should also be relatively large, I think the most amazing thing is that the energy generated by electricity and the energy produced by food in the human body can be compared with one unit.

There are also some funny gods who say that in fact, the reason why the human brain is very powerful is that people can convert some high-definition images into images with only a few bytes, although I really don't know how he came to such a conclusion, but in fact, this statement still makes me feel more funny.

There are also great gods to illustrate this problem from more angles, the great gods say that in fact, the human brain has a lot of external devices, which is equivalent to a computer with a keyboard and mouse, but you have to connect a computer to be able to accept light signals and receive sound signals, some smell signals, and some digital signals and quickly process them.

It's very difficult to do such a thing with a current computer or a current CPU, and within such a small range, or such a small stereo range.

This is what makes me more interested in science, and of course the question of electric currents and magnetic fields is what makes me not interested in science, especially in high school.

In the current part, I think most people are about to tear this circuit diagram apart, he tortures us deeply for a long time, in fact, to be honest, there are some problems that I still don't understand.

Every time I ask the teacher, the teacher and I can only look at a general idea, or understand a general idea, and listen to a general idea.

But now if I am asked to do those questions again, I still can't guarantee that I will get it 100% right, I can only say that I will look at it a little, look at it a little, and solve it a little.

This is the point that makes me very uninterested, I heard that some of the high schools in our hometown are going to be reformed recently, that is, in addition to the number of languages, the history of geography, politics, and physics are selected to take three of these subjects to take the exam, and one of the things I can imagine is that basically no one will choose physics and chemistry.

I don't mean that the proportion of people is very small, I believe that most people will choose biology, and even I think that biology is 100%, of course, this statement seems to be a bit exaggerated.

In fact, what I want to express is that as long as there is a glimmer of hope for the college entrance examination, that is, unlike those scumbags, they still hope that they can change some fate through the college entrance examination, basically they will choose biology subjects.

I don't think we took this issue into account at the time of the reform, because if we really chose life instead of physics and chemistry, maybe some teachers' jobs would be cut off.

After all, if the number of students is less and there are still so many teachers, it will definitely not work, so this kind of reform still needs to be forward-looking, and I don't think the results of this kind of reform will be particularly large, or even that it will have to be reversed within a year or two.

At that time, it may have been an exaggeration to say the other way around, but if you show it through some data, the upper level will get a specific data representation, and if you get a specific data representation, I guess you can imagine the severity of this kind of thing.

A country definitely needs physics and chemistry talents, and the places where this kind of talent is reflected are the places where our country needs them very much, such as aerospace technology, military technology, and other messy industries of the country.

If it is really forced for decades, it may not be that these students really do not want to choose physics and chemistry, but some parents may force their children to take relatively simple courses in order to be able to get as high a score as possible for their students.

I think that if we really want to reform this kind and let the students choose for themselves, we need to consider a problem of proportion, that is, a question of the proportion of the score, what percentage of the score is accounted for.

According to the appropriate adjustment of the data of the previous year, this is a relatively complex problem, the complexity of these problems is simply unimaginable, and the groups involved are simply many children and many people, so in a certain situation, I am particularly considerate of some leaders who make major decisions.

Because those decisions are really decisive, no one wants to be a backward person in these decisions, in other words, everyone wants to take advantage of this decision.

There is nothing wrong with human nature, isn't everyone seeking advantages and avoiding disadvantages?

Anyway, I think students will be more and more bitter in the future, and it should be more bitter than my words at this stage, and there is no need to say more about the bitterness.

I only go to cram school on Saturdays and weekends, and occasionally I go to one after school, but I don't have a way to have my own private space when they are out of school.

I can often see my hometown wearing thick spectacle lenses at a young age, and the thickness of those spectacle lenses is immediately comparable to the thickness of my textbook.

I don't know if that's the right thing to do, but I'm sure I'd be critical of it because I'm one of the victims.

But I can't say that now, because in the case of competition, it seems that if we don't speed up this process as soon as possible, we will indeed fall behind.

But when they saw the thick spectacle lenses, they couldn't quite understand it, or was this really what they wanted in the future?

Nowadays, children may have certain defects in their outlook on life and worldview, they may not be able to understand what they really want, maybe in a certain situation, what they want is just a rebellion against the present or want to play, and their ideas are sometimes so simple and rude.

However, it is not certain whether they will have such an idea in the future, or whether they will have some hatred and revenge against some people who have made such decisions.

I suddenly found that I was still quite powerful, and I was able to say such a deviant thing, it seems that going to college is still a bit useful, at least I can more or less fool others.

You see, what I just said seems to be very philosophical, but to be honest, it seems that this kind of words are only used for pretending, which means that these words can be summed up in one sentence in the end, in other words, these things can be summarized in one sentence.

So in the end, it's just pretending to be used.

I remember reading on a question about this about the same thing, but he was a parent.

In fact, this is the question, why do parents like to blame this thing on mobile phones and computers for so many years?

In fact, this question is still more interesting when it is raised, a very simple thing, in the past, we often heard such a conclusion when we were young, this conclusion is that electronic products are easy to cause myopia in children.

As a result, many parents treat this as a truth, which means that this thing seems to be exactly what it is.

But lately there has been a clear contrast between children who learn to read a lot and children who play games a lot, and it's interesting when it happens.

Even children who read and study often have a particularly high rate of myopia, but those who often play video games have a high rate of myopia.

Then this question has been put on the agenda again, whether electronic products are a cause of myopia in children.

To be honest, I don't think it matters if it's a pot for electronic products or not, what I'm doing now is to be able to have a reason for my parents, what kind of reason to give my parents, that is, you can only study, you can't play video games, because this thing will cause myopia!

So it gave a parent such a reason.

But now this problem still has to be faced, but a parent answered below, if you can really learn will also produce this kind of serious myopia, electronic products will also produce such a serious myopia, then I would rather let the child choose this one, he has no way to make a decision then I will make a decision for him.

There are a lot of examples below, but it can be clearly seen, that is, it can be seen that this parent is still a person with a high level of cultural education.

In other words, his current view is probably not the opinion of some parents who are not particularly highly educated, but his opinion is likely to be that of most parents with high education.

This point of view is actually a simple matter, he doesn't understand anything now, I must make a decision for him!

As a result, there is such a situation, although it is indeed reasonable, but from the perspective of a parent, there is indeed some meaning of the authorities.

I think that if you want to really explain this problem, you have to solve it as a bystander, and you are the kind of cultural intellectual who can say why it is so high.

This must also be if you have not been abused as a child or you should not be able to indulge it for too long as a child, because both of these words will easily cause a deviation in one thing.

In fact, most people have no way to look at this question objectively, in other words, if he was oppressed inhumanly when he was a child, then his answer to this question is even if he is a bystander, that is, although he may not be married and has no children of his own, but he still has no way to answer this question in an objective direction.

He may not have cared about the fact that his current status may be because of his previous oppression, so his answer to this question is also a non-standard answer.

Another parent is too indulgent, which causes him to live a little uncomfortable now, that is, he may be a little financially strained, or he may be a little low in his position.

Then he will definitely blame his parents for why they didn't discipline well when they were young, and if they discipline a little, it might not be such an ending.

This can't be answered objectively, to be honest, many people can't answer objectively, even if it's some more mediocre parents, just say half and half, I care about you and I indulge you, such a child grows up and doesn't get married and has no children, he is not a particularly objective when he answers this question.

Because he may think that this method is better, and he may praise this method vigorously, but the actual situation may not be like this.

This method is probably not suitable for many people, each child's personality is different, each child's environment is also different, and no one can make a positive answer to which thing needs to go.

There is a saying that is very true, if you can't use the environment as a reference to define it, you are playing hooligan.

Therefore, when talking about this conclusion of every thing, we must refer to this matter or the environment in which this thing is located.

Finally, I don't mean the problem of this child, but from my point of view, I don't mean it very objectively, because I still think that if a child can't get a happy child when he is young, it seems that there is nothing that should be there at the age he should have.

But thinking about whether the happiness they want will be their temporary happiness, that is, these happiness may not be able to bring him some skill improvement, in case there is really no way to rely on these things to improve his life ability in the future, it is obviously not good.

As a parent, it is impossible to raise them for a lifetime, and I think this point still needs to be clarified, so this problem is actually very contradictory up and down, and even the middle and top are very contradictory.

His contradictions lie in this three-dimensional multi-figure, that is to say, many contradictions are layered with each other, but the contradictions at each other are not necessarily the same theory.

I feel like I'm talking a little distorted, but if I give an example, it's clear what I mean.

That is, A and B are contradictory, and B and C are also contradictory, but at this time, A and C are probably not the same side in this situation, and they are even contradictory in some aspects.

This contradiction is manifested in the fact that we are in the midst of multiple elements within the same thing, and I think I am especially grateful to my university teachers for being able to say this, because they read the textbook in class and I listened to it like that.

But now when I really want to say these words, I feel that these words are actually very philosophical, will I have a sick aesthetic?

But that's not the point right now, it's just how I can get me to sleep well.

Do you want to watch the video to distract yourself?

Take out your phone and bring your headphones.