1661

The "conceptual rebellion" of the alienated Youjiang is a reflection of the essence of his body as the embodiment of difference, and I guess so. It is precisely because there are differences that there are comparisons and differences, and the same concept can also produce differences through the understanding of different individuals, and the existence of these differences is the premise, and then the process of "reversal" can be carried out. However, even if I try to guess this, I have no clue how to deny this difference and resist the forces of rebellion. When mysterious phenomena must be viewed and dealt with through metaphysical meanings, their own concepts and philosophies are the most influential. However, if the meaning of this mysterious phenomenon is only one's own speculation, and the reality is not certain, it is not surprising that one's own consciousness level of resistance will be greatly reduced.

Ideas are so unpredictable that human beings have thoughts, but this thought is limited by human beings' own limitations. When human beings are not the only beings who can "think" and transform "thoughts" into actual motivation. When the human "mind" is limited by its own limitations and is surpassed by the "monster". When there is a difference between human definitions of things and phenomena and "monsters", which one is correct? Or, even if it is limited to a particular environment and period, which one is the most influential? I think that the answers to these questions will greatly affect the outcome of the final weapon battle.

I initially thought that the ultimate weapon was just a phenomenon produced by some unimaginable programmed mechanical operation, even if the phenomenon was observed by humans as an individual. However, in the end, the relationship between the weapon and the "river", the relationship with the "virus", and the difference between the "river" and the "virus" all made me suddenly realize that I was different from others. Are you confused by the name "Final Weapon"?

In the end, the name "ultimate weapon" is just our definition of such an enemy, such an adversarial individual, such a phenomenon, but is our definition correct? No. Instead of using the word "correct", perhaps it should be said that the things and phenomena we observe will work according to the definition we give them. How accurate are our definitions, descriptions of these things and phenomena? Does it cover all of it? Or is it just a part of what we can observe?

We name this existence "the ultimate weapon" for ourselves, and then think about the meaning of the other person's existence from the meaning of this name, and find a way to deal with it. Isn't there something wrong? After all, aren't we dealing with an "existence that we can't understand"? Since it is incomprehensible, then all the acts of naming it are absolutely not intended to "correctly describe its existence", but only to "solidify its image in the concept".

It's like a "book" for some purpose. Instead of calling it a "book", it is simply called "item A". When we never understand the meaning of "books". The first time we see a "book", we don't fully understand its function, so when we see a book, we don't think of "book", but "item A". The meaning of this "item A" is to be expressed. It must be different from the meaning of "books".

The sleeping monster in front of me, its inherent essence, should be different from the meaning of the so-called "ultimate weapon". We use the "ultimate weapon" to solidify its image in order to have a clear form of purpose. However, you must not use the name "ultimate weapon" to limit it in your imagination, because that is the real delusion.

Yes, whether it is the alienation of Youjiang or the final weapon, they all describe what I have observed, this humanoid monster, but this description is incomplete from the beginning, and this incompleteness is the "word inadequacy" caused by the limitations of the human mind. It was only at this time that I suddenly woke up, why did I realize this so late? That's an obvious fact, isn't it?

No matter how much I try to describe its existence in my imagination, if its existence has exceeded the limits of my own "mind" and "human intelligence" from the beginning, not only beyond my limitations, but also beyond the limitations of the racial concept of "human", then these imaginations are meaningless. Since there is no meaning, then there should be no imagination - thinking and imagining are inherently different. How much of my thinking activities in the past were real thinking, and how much of it was divergent imagination? How much of my thoughts, which have been interfered with by the forces of consciousness and then expanded in a fixed direction, are thoughts about the situation at that time? How much is the imagination of the situation at that time?

If it is "thinking" that is inflated, then in terms of the human definition of "thinking", shouldn't it be more inclined to praise itself? However, since the result of the expansion was malignant at that time, it is of course very likely that it is not "thinking", but just an endless divergent imagination, and there is such a power that confuses the boundary between "thinking" and "imagining" in the cognition of the attacker.

Isn't this actually a kind of manipulation of cognitive concepts? From this point of view, isn't the "thinking locking" displayed by the alienated Youjiang still a mysterious embodiment of the "conceptual rebellion"? No, it's not just "mind locking", maybe even "NEWTYPE" can be explained by the mystery of "conceptual reversal" - not to adapt to the occult phenomenon, but to make the mysterious phenomenon conceptually inverted into something that has no negative impact on it.

In this way, my first hand is arranged, this specially set cage!

-- I suddenly woke up to the "extremely dangerous man-made battlefield" that had swelled to 3,000 meters, and where six mysterious phenomena interacted with each other, intertwined, interfered with each other, and bred more mysterious phenomena.

Does it really work?

The targeted measure I take for "mind locking" is to actively shrink my consciousness, turning the power I have enough to walk consciously into an extremely compressed protective layer, firmly limiting my subjective consciousness to it, and releasing the subconscious part that controls physical behavior on a very large scale. Whether it is contraction or release, it is to minimize the impact of "external interference forces".

However, if "thinking locking" is not only the embodiment of the power of consciousness, but also a by-product of "conceptual rebellion", then. When the "concept" is "reversed", will my targeted measures no longer be effective due to the change of the concept of the object or the concept of self-perception?

If these differences that make the alienated Right River different from the Right River, they are actually all powers mysteriously derived from its essence. The illusion that arises when the observer perceives it -- So, what I am facing is not actually some alienated Youjiang, but Youjiang itself? The mystery I'm dealing with isn't some mutation, absorbing the moon god's "mind lock" and "NEWTYPE", and any other abilities, but just "concept reversal"?

It's like looking at Tomie and considering how much power she has. No matter how strong her body is, how superb her fighting skills are, in fact, it doesn't matter, and what really needs to be broken is just her "relatively stronger" nature? If it's just to increase strength for the sake of power, to strengthen the body for the sake of dealing with the body, if to improve the skill for the sake of skill, if you just look at these things that you can clearly see and feel. Then, I will only feel that Tomie's strength "has no limit".

I felt that I had to make a decision right away—to limit the alienation of Youjiang to the meaning of the name "ultimate weapon". It is almost certain that it is a wrong approach, so which one is correct to regard the alienated Right River as the "Alienated Right River" or as the "Right River"? If you look at it literally, it seems to be correct. "Alienation of the Right River" can be included in the "Right River". There is indeed a correlation between the two, but if you observe and recognize both at the same time, you will only become confused, and you will only observe one. And when you only know one, you can concentrate everything you have to fight.

"That's it...... Right river bar. I gave myself the answer, simply because, if it was "alienated Youjiang", I would think that the various targeted arrangements I have made so far will be "not completely ineffective", so that once it is really "completely ineffective", my emotions and actions will probably be disturbed. After all, isn't it contradictory to make so many arrangements, but feel that "it won't work"? Even if it is "it may be effective, but it may not be effective", in my heart, I am more inclined to "take effect". A person would never do useless work that he didn't expect at all, but just such a little expectation is enough for the monster to take advantage of the situation and expand it into a fatal point - I am so cautious and cautious, because the next battle is so cruel that if you are caught with a mistake that is not worth mentioning in normal times, you will be in a desperate situation.

On the other hand, if the opponent is not "alienated Youjiang", but "Youjiang", then, not against the "conceptual rebellion", but only at other mysteries, it is very likely that when facing "Tomie", she only feels that there is no end to the improvement of her combat power - all the arrangements that initially thought that as long as they were prepared, they could win in these aspects, or at least be limited, will be forcibly destroyed because of these mysterious and unpredictable explosive power. Any arrangement that feels effective will be incredibly fragile.

In this way, the battlefield in front of me, which was deliberately arranged and should be "extremely dangerous" for both sides, has become "extremely dangerous" for me alone, and the Youjiang side can be directly crushed because of the "sudden increase of mysterious power for no reason and no reason" such as "NEWTYPE". Instead of putting "we" in a cage, I became the only one in the cage I made, and that was the truly ridiculous ending.

The battlefield that has already been laid out cannot be canceled, and I still can't tell whether to see the opponent as an "alienated right river" or as a "right river", but how it can break through this cage in battle should make me make up my mind.

As for the strategy for "mind locking", because it is on the conscious level, there is still plenty of time to decide whether to give up after observing the way it breaks out of the cage - I think so, probably because I still have the expectation of a situation that is "beneficial to oneself", because if it will only become a situation of "one's own benefit" in any case, does it mean that this battle should not have been fought in the first place? And if you encounter the "ultimate weapon" in the future, should you run away every time?

I've never won the final weapon, only to be defeated and killed by her again and again, so, is this fate doomed? Shouldn't I have the mentality of "maybe I can win"? Although every time you fight, it seems that you have fallen from the beginning, but can't you expect "possibility"? I've tried so hard to analyze myself, to analyze the enemy, to think, to imagine, to guess, and to put all kinds of exercises and actual battles into practice, all of which have accumulated so much that if I can only feel that "I should still run away", if I have run away like this, I have not allowed myself to survive, I have not been able to save anyone, and I have not given any impetus to my own plans, then what is the point of what I have paid?

I was worried, and there were endless troubles, and when I looked at the sleeping face of the alienated Youjiang or Youjiang, it kept breeding, and I almost suspected that I was actually being interfered with by the other party's inherent and continuously functioning consciousness walking power. The thoughts that swirled in my mind kept denying myself and affirming myself, and this surge showed no sign of cease.

I'm still retreating, and I'm constantly retreating with the proliferation of the "cage-like battlefield" of special bullets. But no matter how much the battlefield spreads and how I retreat, the larger dumbbell-like cage built by the Eye of the Moon still envelops us. At the other end of the "dumbbell", the amorphous-shaped multi-eyed tentacle monster "Shitenin Gacoconut" swims towards the slender part in the middle of the "dumbbell" like a cosmic monster. It seems to want to get through that part to our side. However, although it must have swam very fast, its relative position shrank rather slowly, just as it had been when I approached the Alienated Right River.

Last time, it was the battle between the Four Heavenly Courtyard and the Eye of the Moon that allowed me to continue to get close to the Alienated Right River. So, this time, is it my battle with the Alienated Right River that can make it easier for the Four Heavenly Yuan Gaco to get closer to this side? I can't help but think so. (To be continued.) )