When Cai Ruichen returned to the present world, he immediately heard the news that Russia was withdrawing its troops from Syria.

The moment he heard the news, Cai Ruichen didn't feel strange at all.

Just as Russia suddenly sent troops to Syria without any warning at the beginning, this time the withdrawal of troops was also without any signs at all, and it suddenly withdrew.

This has directly had a considerable impact on the policy interests of the countries of the entire Middle East countries.

Just as Russia's sudden dispatch of troops to Syria brought about similar consequences, it has had a very huge impact on the Middle East and even Europe.

And to see the reason behind this matter, it is necessary to stand next to the big chessboard of the world and watch how the players around this chessboard think about problems and make decisions.

At this moment, although Cai Ruichen is not qualified to become a direct chess player, he is already standing beside these current chess players, watching their thinking every step and every consideration before falling.

In response to the news of Russia's sudden withdrawal of troops, Cai Ruichen is very confident that all the relevant news about the European Union, Russia, and the United States in recent months has been gathered.

Soon a reason why Russia should withdraw its troops, the side soon appeared.

Among them, there are three key news that are worth Cai Ruichen's attention.

News 1: In an interview with The Atlantic, the world's most famous international political newspaper, US President ****** said: "Ukraine's interests are not the core interests of the United States, but Ukraine's interests are Russia's core interests." ”

In response to this passage. The Atlantic published a detailed interpretation of the article, publishing a tens of thousands of words of analysis that not only listed all the political decisions made by ****** since he became president. It also analyzes in detail the thinking and style of the White House International ******** Staff Team.

This article is a good account of all the foreign policies of the ****** since he came to power, and it focuses on all the contradictions between the United States and Russia on the Ukraine issue.

News 2: In a recent speech, the spokesperson of the EU presidency officially stated that Ukraine should not want to join the EU within 20 years. Not long after this news appeared, the spokesman of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization also officially stated it to the public. Ukraine does not want to join NATO for 25 years.

Although these two messages were sent by different organizations, the result is obvious, and it is a complete tragedy in Ukraine.

Why did Ukraine feel that it was against Russia in the first place? Why do you dare to jump in front of ****, it's not because of some private hints or promises, it may be more or less a promise to join the EU and NATO.

And if it weren't for the EU and NATO, Ukraine wouldn't have had the guts to be so antagonistic to a neighbor that could completely crush it militarily.

Outcome. There has been no news of joining the EU and NATO. As a result, Crimea disappeared and became the territory of Russia.

The civil war also broke out, and the country can almost be said to be struggling with the people, and a good country has become a war-torn country overnight.

The economy has regressed, its international influence has plummeted, and it has lost Russian gas supplies.

If this can join the EU and NATO, then perhaps Ukraine's top brass will feel that it is worth it. But now, all hope has come to naught.

Ukraine can almost be said to have been abandoned by the EU and NATO. All the hopes of the Ukrainian government were completely sacrificed.

And Ukraine alone will not be able to stop Russia, a fierce polar bear.

Combined with the first news, although ****** did not say that sentence on a formal occasion, saying that sentence in one of the most famous international political monthly magazines in the world is almost a warm-up of this matter in advance, and it is a very obvious political trend.

Immediately after that, there were follow-up actions by the EU and NATO, and Ukraine was officially ruthlessly abandoned.

News 3: After these news appeared one after another, Russian officials also suddenly announced a message, that is, they support Syria to establish a federal state.

The news of Russia did not appear, and the first two news were pure foolish acts of NATO and the European Union, but as soon as this news appeared, many people suddenly realized.

It is clear that the interests of the two countries, Syria and Ukraine, have become bargaining chips for the exchange of great powers.

Otherwise, why would the EU and NATO give up the interests of Ukraine, and it would be almost impossible if there was no corresponding exchange of interests.

And this is one of the interests of **** sending troops to Syria, on the issue of Ukraine, it is impossible for Russia to come up with its own national interests to trade with the United States. This is a traitor, and it is also a super loss-making business, and it is impossible for any superpower, even a great power, to do this.

So what to do?

A very effective method was used decisively, and that was to create a chip that could be traded at another point of conflict.

This bargaining chip is the Assad regime in Syria, and one of the most direct goals of sending troops is to help the Assad government consolidate its own power.

I have to say that Russia's sudden dispatch of troops really shocked the whole world, and there was no sign at all, and even from the beginning there was no news from the United States. All of them were caught off guard by Russia's actions.

However, Russia's excuse for sending troops is very reasonable, it is the Syrian government that invited Russia to come and attack the ****** armed forces that everyone shouted at that time, which is very legitimate, and there is no reason for any country to interfere.

Although the United States is well aware that Russia has come to Syria to support the Assad regime, the United States cannot stop it.

After all, Russia's dispatch of troops to fight extremist organizations is fully in line with the regulations of the United Nations, and it is also an invitation in the name of the Syrian government, and it is not the turn of the United States to say that it does not agree.

Even if the United States says it disagrees, the **** will not go to the bird Americans.

The plan clearly worked, and the Assad regime officially stabilized when Russian warplanes began to appear over Syria.

After more than five years of civil war in Syria, at this point, the main goal of the United States, the goal of bringing down the Assad regime, can almost be said to have failed.

If the United States fails, Saudi Arabia fails, and the rest of NATO fails.

In five years, the Assad regime will still exist, and unless it is a direct military war with Russia, the Assad regime will still exist even five years later.

In the current situation in Syria, the bargaining chips needed by **** have appeared, and they can also be used, that is, the interests of Syria (to be continued. )