Our Lady also has a selfish side
There is a brother in the book review who said that Tang Zihao manages everything and spends money on everything. Pen @ fun @ pavilion wWw. ļ½ļ½ļ½Uļ½Eć ļ½ļ½ļ½ļ½
I can see that this brother is a little distressed by the Tang madman. I replied twice in the book review, but for some reason both failed to publish. So I'll open a separate chapter and talk to you.
I just have some thoughts on this issue, it's not a complaint, everyone has read it, don't go to the book review to argue and scold people.
.......
First of all, let's not talk about the Virgin or not.
Let's think about two questions:
If you had a million, what would you do? I think most people will sell their homes and settle down. Improve the living environment, because it is a basic need to live.
And what if there are 10 billion? Material pleasures can no longer satisfy the sense of accomplishment that wealth brings. Maybe we'll go to a higher level, or maybe we'll pass it on to our descendants? Because the next generation is, in a sense, an extension of our lives.
Then the question arises, what if there is a trillion?
I think that at that time, more people would choose to use wealth to realize their self-worth, ideals, dreams, and even fantasies. Most likely, because even in reality, it is impossible for anyone to reach that height. The current Gaici, Ma Yun, Musk, Zack, etc., already have this tendency.
In the author's opinion, it doesn't matter whether the Virgin is or not, it's just that the level is different and the demands are different.
Why did Bell donate all the money and get a fund to reward future generations who had nothing to do with him?
A hundred years ago, he was a little bit of a virgin, but a hundred years later, look at it today! He was a great man and did a great thing.
Shakyamuni is already a prince, why bother to start a religion on his own?
He is more virgin than the Virgin, but after a thousand years, Buddhism has spread half the world, affecting how many countries and how many people? He has become a god.
Another example is the Three Kingdoms at the end of the Han Dynasty, Cao Cao scattered all the money and recruited the villagers to fight for Dong, why did Wei Zi, an irrelevant person, also help him? Our Lady? No, a son of filial piety is the sand of the Ganges, and he is lost to mortals. But because of this move, the history will last forever.
Qian Xuesen, Hua Luogeng, Deng Jiaxian, and so many people with lofty ideals, why did they abandon the privileged life abroad and return to the poor and white motherland?
Stripped of the noble coat, it is said that the level of people is different, the demands are different, and the understanding of value is also different. Who would say Musk is a businessman? Who can still say that Nobel is a of the virgin?
In the same way, Tang Zihao's appeal is not wealth, so if he has money, why keep it? If he gathers together, then what is the difference between him and those clans? In other words, if you have money just to pretend to be a slap in the face, then it will really be a little white in Chengdu.
In fact, there is no difference between his dedication to spending money and the dedication of other novel protagonists to making money, it is just a manifestation of self-worth. It's just that his demands are a little higher, and his "ambition" is a little bigger. (To be continued.) )