Therefore, there will definitely be people who take advantage of this trend, and naturally people who have the ability and ability will be able to concentrate some public opinion on themselves.

In fact, this is the case, and it is very simple for a rich and powerful person to talk about how to use people's orientation.

When all the people in the world say it's true, then it's true.

No one even wants to doubt such a thing.

Of course, I don't mean any group or any person, in fact, when I say that China is black, if you watch some movies, you will know that foreign countries are actually quite black.

The use of public opinion guidance is also quite serious, especially some groups that can even dominate the government.

However, in China's view, there should be no group that can actually dominate the government, and China does not allow large-scale violent gangs to exist.

Basically, such people are all up-and-coming birds, one counts one, two counts two, and basically no one can escape the sanctions of the state.

However, this is not the case in some foreign capitalist countries, and some foreign capitalist countries even say that an enterprise can dominate the government's public opinion orientation.

For example, in a war near the Mediterranean, according to reliable sources, some arms dealers could not sell their arms.

Then they create some rumors that some countries have biological and chemical weapons, and then they come up with their own evidence in a decent way, and then they convince the country to attack that place.

So the country really went to fight that place, of course, there must have been other reasons, not only this one reason, but only one reason, the arms dealer is really awesome.

However, this is enough to show that enterprises can dominate the direction of some public opinion.

And then after those wars, there were also people who proved that that country did not have biological and chemical weapons.

But it's too late, you can't say to sanction a big country, and the United Nations doesn't have the ability to do so, and the United Nations probably started it by his family.

Therefore, there is no other way than to condemn, at most it is to retaliate against some soldiers on the ground, and the rest can only swallow a mouthful of saliva, break your teeth and swallow it into your stomach.

It can only be said that luck is not good, and then such a country was chosen.

But the end result was of course good for the company, which sold a lot of its own arms, and not only the arms of this war.

Because after seeing such a scene, some countries are sure that everyone in the nearby countries is in danger, and they will more or less buy a little more arms to disguise themselves.

So that's what happened.

There's no way to say exactly how business is done in there.

However, in fact, in China, there are also public opinion guidance that can be created, but the public opinion guidance that the state can create accounts for the majority.

Among them, some Chinese companies can create public opinion guidance, which is the most in entertainment and real estate, as for what natural and man-made disasters are concerned, no company dares to touch such a place.

is also like what we call the celebrity entertainment industry, the public opinion guidance in it is actually very serious, and what we often see is absolutely never true.

It's just that we look at what they want us to see, except for the real paparazzi.

Some magazines are weekly, all of which are owned by entertainment companies, don't think that entertainment companies only open movies and just train stars to make TV series.

In fact, every entertainment company is involved in a lot of scope, as for the number of places, it is simply beyond our imagination, real estate, food, medicine, and so on and so on are definitely the places they can get into.

Therefore, for some entertainment-oriented words, those entertainment companies are deeply touched, and they are simply good at public relations, after all, they have done this kind of thing many times.

There is also the news recommended by some other software in the browser spam, which they can also guide, because those editors are the writers they send.

We can really say that those who write some articles through their own thoughts basically can't survive, because if you don't write articles very well, you don't actually have much income, and those who can make do with it and survive are at the mercy of others.

What they earn is actually the public opinion money, as for those who can really write good articles, and then write some real things, it is often a very difficult thing to post.

Besides, when everyone says something, if you say that it's not right, most people won't believe you.

That's not to say how dark it is, or how chilling it is.

In fact, once people reach their thirties or forties, they will naturally understand this kind of thing, and even if they have been in contact with some high-level people since childhood, they can understand such things.

In fact, this kind of thing has existed since ancient times, and I don't want to say anything about how this era is doing, how it is in this year.

In fact, all cars that start with these three words are basically declaring that this era is not good, and declaring that this era is indeed not as good as before.

In fact, if you think about it carefully, you will know that whenever such a national group appears, the matter of public opinion orientation already exists, and it does not mean that this thing has only appeared after the establishment of New China.

We say that we are a bit serious because of the development of information now, but when the information was not developed in the past, the closure was not serious?

It's much better now, because of the development of information, the controversy is relatively large, which is what we usually call tearing, when the two enemies break the news to each other, there is always something that is true.

However, it is not so easy when information is not developed, and it is easier to cause an information blockage when there are fewer channels to obtain information.

So it's a very simple thing, don't judge an era, if you're really good, then get out of the mud and not stain.

I don't like to pronounce a verdict on what country is it, how about the four generations?

In fact, the individual of a country is an individual, and sometimes the atmosphere of a country has a lot to do with a person.

I quite think that China is a good country, because we were born in an era of peace, and it is not particularly difficult to say that you really want to live.

It's just a matter of living a good and bad life.

And the state also understands the word that the people are greater than the sky, of course, I don't mean that the people will be good to everyone, I just say that the state also knows how to let the people talk less.

The premise of not talking much is to let them live as well as possible, if the people feel that they are not doing well, it may be true that they are not doing well.

It should be said that especially now, in fact, most of the post-90s generation can definitely live well as long as they can be down-to-earth, and they don't have to look at the face of the leader.

Because as long as a person is really capable of leading and treating you really badly, just don't dump him, and you can still live if you resign.

In other words, things like the social security fund are generally more normal, and most companies dare not touch such things, because they are allowed to do so.

There must be a reason why the state attaches so much importance to the matter of pension, in fact, in my father's view, it is mandatory for you to leave a little money so that you can support your pension in the future.

That is, the state is like an old man who lets his son give him money and then put it here for himself, and then put it in the money bank, and let the money bank give him a little interest.

At the beginning, the old man asked his son for money, and his son must not be particularly comfortable, what are you doing for you to earn money and I need so much money.

But when the old man was about to die, and then he told a son that I left you a sum of money in the bank, and this money was all given to me by you before, and I didn't touch a penny, if you are useful, even take out the principal and interest.

At this time, the son thought about the benefits of the old man.

Because we don't talk about this inflation issue first, because no one thinks about the country in the future.

Do you think you're powerful in something that the country can't even think of?

Just like this family planning, sometimes the state does not think of the current situation, and it is absolutely not wrong for them to immediately let family planning.

But it's just a bit of overkill.

The state never thought about why young people don't want to have children now, and they would never have imagined how the birth rate has become so low.

They thought that once they opened up the matter, it was likely that the birth would soar, but it turned out that this thing really didn't work.

When the technology economy slowly developed, people began to think about themselves, and they used to think that it was a very good thing to have a child to support themselves.

But now everyone has become a little selfish to say something unpleasant, and then people are not very willing to inherit incense, in fact, the inheritance of incense is something that cannot be seen or touched.

People are gradually getting rid of this theory, and after I die, this incense may not be very good, and it really has nothing to do with me.

Once you don't have a special belief in some theories, basically this kind of thing is normal, and I believe that everyone at that time probably didn't think of this, they just thought about reducing the population as soon as possible because the population was going to explode.

Soon, China will not be able to bear it, so they are thinking about reducing the population and family planning, or that sentence is absolutely a very normal thing.

However, I heard that many people did not think about this thing before the *family planning, that is, when the population was exploding, but at that time* when family planning was proposed, no one cared about it.

At that time, it was indeed quite normal, and it is likely that many people were laughing at this plan.

There are two reasons, the first reason is that the population is in a very small stage just after the war, and many people are thinking about how to plan for family planning when it is too late for me to increase the population.

The second point is that labor was urgently needed at that time, because industrialization had not yet been completely completed, and many things needed to be completed by manpower, so the requirements for manpower were very high, which was a joke about this plan.

In fact, if you say something inappropriate, that is, what we call a later word, in fact, it is just some useless words.

At that time, if family planning was needed, because the family planning they proposed at that time was not only one or two children per family.

At that time, family planning seemed to be about three or four, and at that time, I thought that the population could also grow to this level, and it could slowly reduce the population.

Therefore, such a plan could be called a plan against the sky at that time, and if it could be implemented, it would really make China's leaders spend a lot less money.

It can only be said that it is a pity, of course, it is within the normal range.

Now let more people have more people, many people are even more cold, in fact, there are some things that are easy to reduce and difficult to increase, if you want to increase in the process of reduction, you can punish them.

But if you want to decrease in the process of increasing, using punishment will not do anything.

So getting people to have more children can actually become a social problem.

No matter what socialism or capitalism we have, in fact, when society finally develops to a certain point, it still has common characteristics.

Just look at Mr. Ou and look at the United States, how difficult it is for them to increase their population.

Some people say that it is not good, because those countries are too far away, and the basic national conditions may be different.

Okay, then don't look far, then look close, where can the nearest be South Korea Japan, just look at South Korea and Japan, in fact, especially Japan.

The birth rate of this population was the lowest a few years ago, and now Japan is forcing people to want to increase the desire to have children.

Anyway, all kinds of policies come out at the same time, and the policies of each place and each place are simply a hundred flowers blooming, but look at the actual effect?

Needless to say, there is no effect, and of course it can't be said that there is any effect, only that the effect is really not obvious at all compared to the general scope.

What is the result? It's clear that people like to enjoy more in their lifetimes.

I am becoming less and less interested in the matter of inheriting incense.

In other words, if you put this policy in China ten years ago, my God, I wouldn't be surprised that the population has grown by 2 billion now.

When it comes to this, I guess real estate also has a lot to do with this, there must be more places to do when the population is larger, as the saying goes, demand determines price.

But if you want to put this policy now, we don't talk about the rural areas and the fourth-tier cities, let's talk about the 123rd-tier cities, even if this policy is placed in the 123rd-tier cities, I believe it will not have much effect.

That's what it looks like, when people's minds have been precipitated, no matter how much benefit you give, they won't turn over layers of waves in their thoughts.

You've had children before, okay, then take more money, and it's a lot of money, so a lot of people are looking back.

But now you want to say that whoever doesn't give birth will be fined, and if you see if someone has paid the money, there must be someone who has paid, and there are quite a few people who have paid.

Of course, this is certainly not possible, because it is particularly easy to cause that chaos, and even at this time, the state has no way to control this public opinion orientation.

So the state is certainly not able to do this, and even if it does, some people don't buy it.

Because now some people think that I have a hard time raising a child, if you fine me, you will fine me, I will spend money to buy peace.

The fundamental problem is that it is difficult for anyone to have an interest in this kind of thing when the cost is too high, especially since the result of this cost is a risk, which may bring a good result and of course a bad result.

It's a bit hard to accept if you compare a child to a cost, but it's telling.

When we face something about ourselves, we actually think about the cost and the wealth it brings, even if it is a living life.

What we think is that this child needs milk powder, needs someone to take care of me every day, I may lose my job, I may not be able to go to a good school when I go to school, I also need to buy a school district house, annual tuition and living expenses, extremely subsidized expenses for various leaders.

When you get to university, the cost of living becomes even higher, and then education is another issue, which means bothering.

In addition, when I go to society, I have to care about whether he can find a job, and finally I have to care about how her partner is, where and what the future conditions are, and whether they can have a good life.

I believe that many people's heads have become very big when they think about this, and when they start thinking about many, many problems, what is the best way to solve this problem?

The best solution to this problem is, of course, to get rid of the root cause of the problem! Without this problem, there is no such series of results.

That's why I said that people are more or less selfish, I didn't say that I wasn't selfish, and now I don't want to have children.

I'm also a very selfish person, and now I just want to work in the future, and if I have money, I can go around, go to the places I want to visit, and then come back to work with peace of mind, work in the morning, and come back to play with the computer in the evening.

That's probably because my mind is not very mature, but I believe that not only do I have this idea, but many young people in their twenties and thirties will also have this idea.

Therefore, this kind of thing will be easy to reduce at the beginning, and it will not be easy to improve when it is raised.

On the other hand, there are actually too many things to choose from, just like the post-90s I just said, why the current post-90s are not really too discouraged.

This is why many people in society say that the post-90s are unwilling to endure hardships and that the post-90s are unwilling to do things hard.

It certainly seems to them to be the right thing to do, and if we look at it in his mind, from their point of view, it may indeed be the case.

First of all, most of the post-90s generation actually have no shortage of houses, so this leads to the fact that they really don't care about some things.

Then the hard work that their leaders said was different from the hard work that the post-90s generation said, and the hard work that the leaders said was that you can continue to work better after I scolded you.

And the hard work that the post-90s generation said is that I am immersed in work, and I can bear the hard work they say, but if I work hard every day and you give me a face, then I will resign.

In their opinion, it may be that this thing hurts their self-esteem, in other words, the price you give them is not worth it, if the price you give is high enough that they may say to work as hard as you say.

Another point is that most of the current leaders are around the 70s, which was really hard at that time, and then there were not many jobs.

After getting a job, you must cherish this job, whether it is the abuse of the leader or the run of colleagues, it may not be possible to rule out the confidence of the job that they will lose.

Therefore, they are now post-90s, no, it should be said that it is our generation of post-90s.

I really don't want to bear such a thing.

On the one hand, there are indeed more jobs now, and on the other hand, young people have such an idea that there is no place to stay here.

It is true that there are many such cases, so many leaders, or those born in the 70s, began to say on the Internet that the post-90s generation could not endure hardships, and the post-90s generation harmed the whole country.

In fact, we can't say which side is wrong and which side is right, from their own point of view, they are all right.

On the one hand, I think that young people should cherish their work and should be able to endure hardships, because they can be masters in hardships, and I will leave it to you to try to rest assured that you will work overtime in order to make you better familiar with the company's work.

Of course, there is no shortage of people with ulterior motives, and we will exclude this and say that no matter what happens.

But that's what people on the other side think, I'm not a place without a job, why do I have to listen to you here to talk to me, nag and nag endlessly, I can't finish and I go? Do you have to make me work overtime, are you sick?

Although this idea is extreme, it is indeed correct, so since both sides are right, which side is right.

First of all, it is impossible to say which side of the idea is right, because times are different, and the current era is changing too fast.

Matter determines thoughts, and matter determines people's thoughts, that is to say, the rapid development of science and technology determines the diversification of materials, which also determines that ideas are changeable.

Changing ideas are likely to produce some conflicts, and the emergence of such conflicts is actually about an era and an era.

In the past, the possibility of a hook was not particularly large, for example, in ancient times, when I asked you to farm, I farmed the land, and I let you do business.

Your world is in this area, and you don't understand what the outside world is like, and you only worship me.

Of course, I'm talking about what a father says to a son, and at that time there were a lot of feelings of worship, and I should say that they could last for a long time.

Now this kind of worship may not be so long, but there is definitely it, but as the child sees more of the world, this worship will become weaker and weaker.

A very simple example is who we admired the most when we were children, and it goes without saying that it was our father, and we all felt that our real father was the greatest person in the world, and we all felt that our father was the most powerful person in the world.

Anyone can fight, anyone can fight.

Of course, as the world grows more and more, then this worship will become lower and lower.

Needless to say, in today's information society, some things are developing too fast, not to mention people like our fathers and mothers, let's just say that our young people may not be able to accept all of them.

As a result, the generation gap is particularly easy to appear, and the previous generation gap was not so easy to appear, and of course it will definitely appear, because the modern gap will not develop without it.

To be precise, there should be a difference in development, and this difference must be a generation gap, which is different from the ideas of the previous generation, which is a generation gap.

Now because it is easy to produce a generation gap, it is easy to produce the changeability of ideas, so it is normal for the post-70s and post-90s to have a different thought.

In different times, every idea is right and every idea is wrong.

When we use the right time, we need to combine it with the contemporary era, and it is indeed right.

I just said that there is no shortage of houses for the post-90s, of course, it does not mean that every post-90s generation does not lack houses, what I said is that most of them are not short of houses.

Because those who work are generally divided into rooms, and the people at that time are particularly able to endure hardships, it is absolutely their destiny to settle down and start a business, so the first thing they do is to take care of their own family business for their younger generations.

So now that there is this thing, it is really useless for some leaders who really like to use overtime and abuse to manage their subordinates.

When you push him to be anxious, he scolds you for giving you face, and resigning directly makes you even more dumbfounded.

Therefore, this issue must be viewed in combination.

Of course, I can't say that anyone who heard such a conclusion and immediately resigned.

I'm just saying that the post-90s generation has a relatively low degree of bearing, not as high as before, and many people can bear it.

Another thing I don't agree with is that they say that the post-90s generation has no quality.

Of course, this problem should be divided into two points to look at, the first point is that some people born in the 90s are indeed more tigers, because of the only child, they are very doting, so they feel that their things are justified.

Of course, there are such things, and I believe that such things exist in every generation, not only in the post-90s area.

And now is the information age, the information age spreads relatively quickly, and the saying that this good thing does not go out and the bad thing spreads thousands of miles is carried forward more thoroughly.

Because I have seen a case before, there was a case of a little girl who became pregnant at the age of 12, and then someone said based on this case how are people now, how are children now?

In fact, it's hard to say exactly how to say this, but some people are not convinced, and then they investigate all the people who have that kind of thing at this age every year.

This led to the conclusion that the number of people who behave like this every year is about that number, and it is not much worse.

That is to say, in the past, there were numbers in the 70s, 80s, and 90s, so why should we say that we are in this era, and it is not good to kill a boatload of people with a stick.

So my conclusion has blocked many people's mouths, or because of the new era, things have spread very widely and very quickly, so people will have a delusion, and this illusion is as if such things only happen in our time.

In fact, of course, this is not the case, this thing is only because the original people's worldview is not so big, and the speed of obtaining information and its dissemination is not so fast, which leads some people to even say that most people feel that such a thing did not occur in their time.

Using this case, let's talk about most of the post-90s, as long as such a thing happens after the 90s, it will spread very quickly and widely, causing many people to think that this kind of thing only appears in the post-90s.

So that's why there is such a situation.

As for whether that's the case or not, I think it's likely to turn out much better than they thought.

The illiteracy rate is actually very low now, especially in the post-90s generation, where basically all people can go to junior high school and high school, and the proportion of students going to college is also very high.

We don't care whether they learned culture in college or high school, but I believe that the overall quality must have improved, and it has improved a lot.

Do you say that those years when illiteracy was very low were good people? I think it's a bit unlikely, right? The saying that poor mountains and bad waters produce bad people is sometimes true.

I'm not sarcastic, I'm just saying that sometimes it's true.

Therefore, I think the post-90s generation should be much better than before, and those who say how the post-90s generation is doing, I guess they have heard a lot of such news, so I don't think I can blame others.

It's just that the time of the information explosion is unclear to everyone.

Actually, there's something particularly special about it.

It's about playing with mobile phones.

We can often know that parents are particularly worried about playing with their mobile phones.

I've seen an article like this that says something like this.

In fact, if you give a smartphone to some middle-aged people now, who are about 40 to 50 years old, and then teach them all the functions so that they can use all the content on this smartphone.

In the end, it turned out that the degree of their addiction is actually the same as that of young people now, which means that all people are not very high-minded people, and it does not mean that middle-aged people are not addicted to some new things.

Obviously, when these new things appear, they are just unwilling to accept them, and once they can understand all the four or five things clearly, then they are also very easy to indulge in them.

I'm not saying it's a bad thing, I'm just saying that it shouldn't be divided by age.

This kind of thing happens because of this kind of thinking, people are interested in some interesting new things, which is a natural thing, not because you are older you will not have such an interest.

So when you go home to work for the Chinese New Year, and then you don't get up at home to play on your phone, and then your parents talk about you, the best way for you to deal with them is not to refute them with words.

The best way to do this is to teach them to play with their phones.

And then this kind of thing that makes you don't have to go to bed early on your phone won't be there anymore.

This is not unfounded, and I have seen quite a few of them.

In fact, they don't have to learn anything else, they don't have to teach any more complicated mobile games.

In fact, there are only three things that need to be taught by the church.

The first point is WeChat video chat, and then let him add some good friends around her, so that he can experience this pleasant feeling of being able to video chat anytime and anywhere.

The second point is to fight the landlord, yes you heard it right, it is the landlord, I said that there is no need to hand over some complex mobile games, so that they can play some games on the mobile phone that they usually need to gather to be able to play, so that their sense of pleasure will be more enhanced.

In the same way, we can not only let them play landlords, we can also let them play mahjong, let them play mahjong with friends, and in the dormitory we often play enough level upgrades and so on, and install all these things on him.

Rest assured, he's addicted to it even more than you.

The third is to install some news software for them, whether it is special software for news, or some browser software, that is, they can know the major events of the world anytime and anywhere without using TV, and it is best to bring a weather forecast.

The weather forecast must be seven days, and you can roughly guess the temperature trend of the last 30 days, when there are these points.

You can rest assured that he is also playing with his phone when you are playing with his phone, and he will not talk to you about these things, because he is too late.

Some people say that you are not harming them.

I just want to say you can pull it down, why are you so selfish? You yourself are exposed to new things and don't let your parents come into contact with them, they raised you so big and let you know how to read every day, why don't you say and don't let them teach you to read, this is a selfish bastard.

They may be addicted, but when you let them experience the fun, you are saying that they may understand you, and they will understand you and know the truth.

When the time comes, you may also understand such a thing, wouldn't it be nice to kill three birds with one stone!

Of course, these words are all later, and these things I am talking about are definitely not for fun, because I have seen too many such things on the news, and not only in the news but among my classmates in my neighborhood.

And the higher the position of the classmates, the stronger their ability to get in touch with new things, because they need to keep pace with the times in order to be able to enrich themselves and make themselves more wealthy.

The easiest ones I've ever seen are those who play stocks, and I guess those who play stocks are the first parents to get into smart phones, and they don't need a computer with a good network anymore.

Because at that time, when they were crazy about stocks, they had to have a computer with a good network, and if the network was not good, it would affect their wealth and money.

My classmate's parents also pulled a special line for this, and people who don't know it well don't know how expensive this special line is.

Anyway, let's put it this way, this network speed can bring up a company's 20 computers to the highest end of the Internet speed! Not to mention bringing one at home.

As for how much money a year is, it's basically more than five figures, because when the network is not good, they are even so angry that they smash the computer.

However, playing with mobile phones may not have this limitation, because the data required by mobile phones can sometimes provide more than computers, and that is limited to sometimes.

And when they are outside, the computer is not particularly easy to use anytime and anywhere, but after having a mobile phone, there is no such vacancy, and the 4G network is enough for them to speculate in stocks.

Therefore, such people are likely to be the first people to contact smart phones, and there are some bigwigs of network companies, and they sometimes transform based on this smart phone.

Of course, I can't say much about what I said, but it's all about my classmates' parents, and there are actually a lot of interesting things.

It seems to be off topic again, at the beginning, I talked about the direction of public opinion, and then I seemed to talk about the problem of population, and when I talked about the problem of population, I talked about the problem of the post-90s.

Okay, let's continue to talk about the post-90s, this post-90s is the rise in front of me, such a post-90s is actually rare, and the reason for the rarity is that the post-90s lack of gold.

What does this gold mean, it is the kind of gold content that lacks a certificate.

In fact, to be honest, if the family doesn't have money and can't go to college, I really don't understand what the family thinks.

I don't count this, and I'm ready to go to college now, I didn't plan to go to college, but after Qiyang persuaded me, I started to want to go to college again.

So speaking of Yang, this is basically an exception, the rich second-generation parents, no matter how bad the child is, they have to arch the child's certificate, whether it is studying abroad or finding a pheasant university, anyway, there is absolutely no need to be ambiguous in the eyes of others.

On the other hand, on the old man's side, my god I feel like I got the kids out of college as if they were unwilling, in fact, I felt that there was something wrong with the father of the young man more than once.

As for what the problem is, I don't think he was born to his father, or even his mother.

But since it's not biological, why not have one more? Now that technology is so advanced, it doesn't matter if you are sick, this is why I really can't figure this out!!

When I saw his dad, I kept watching how Yang looked like his dad, and then I could see that they looked alike everywhere! It's really quite similar, it's definitely biological, right?