Passerby Long Wind Road Long Theme: A group of sycophants...... "First of all, I'm not a troll, I just stopped by to read the book of the starting point Dameng Long Shao, and after reading a few chapters, I can only say that this book is so wild that it exceeds my understanding of online texts...... Others are not commented on......

It's just that I don't know that Lu Dao writes long reviews in this book review area, and the waistcoat of the person who slaps the sycophants seems to have a novel that hits the street. I really want to say that if you can write such a wonderful long review of Long Shao, why not write a wonderful novel to tens of millions of readers at the starting point...... Deeply despises those who come to ask for a reward from Long Shao with a clear conscience. Not much else...... It's all on the boutique channel,...... , even the little mother bowed her head...... I really hope that the local tyrant dragon will open this book and write a real online article......"

The author replied: Another passer-by child who didn't read my preface carefully, and at the same time thought that he could define what is a real online article, and it can only be said that people who are not serious will always fail.

Besides, if you come to me and leave a bunch of sycophants, it means that you are even more shitty, really.

Read your friend Shancao: Said to Long Yinyue: Uncle Long, I saw "Tianma Starry Sky Tetralogy" a few days ago and was shocked to think that it was a celestial, and I wanted to write a long review. But there is not enough time. I want to say that there are thousands of opinions from a thousand people, and after I watched Pegasus, I always had an inexplicable urge to shout to the sky at the top of the mountain. It's not depression, it's not joy, it's a mixed mood.

Long Yinyue replied: There are thousands of people who think that it is indeed a bunch of ignorant children and wicked people, and I can't help it, there are always bad guys in this world!

The King looked up at the words that Mao Zhedong had explained in the world. smiled: "The elder brother thinks that the words are not only like this, the younger brother is as free as me. There is also the so-called 2 words of freedom in the world, laugh with my brother!"

The King of Freedom spat out a cigarette like a word, revealing rows and rows of words: "Freedom is at the same time a concept in political philosophy, under which human beings can self-dominate, act of free will, and take responsibility for their own actions."

There are different views on the concept of freedom in scholarship, and there are differences in the understanding of the relationship between the individual and society.

Freedoms include freedom of expression and information and freedom of the press, as enshrined in the constitutions of various countries.

Of course, there are many kinds of free will, such as freedom of thought, freedom of religious belief, etc., but because the concept of freedom is different in academic terms, there is only a thin line between freedom and nonsense. Therefore, in the legal concept, the principle of innocence and freedom guarantees the right to liberty of the person.

Freedom has a variety of meanings:

1. It means a right or freedom guaranteed by the Constitution or the Fundamental Law. It can ensure that people are not enslaved, imprisoned or controlled by an authoritarian regime, or that they can be liberated.

2. Freedom in the sense of willfulness. Say whatever you want, do whatever you want. Laissez-faire.

3. Freedom in the sense of doing things according to the law, the so-called understanding and transformation of necessity.

4. Freedom in the sense of autonomous. Kant uses the word freedom in this sense.

5. It is the right of people to independently pursue their own goals in the field they own.

and in the Declaration of the Rights of Man, the programmatic document of the French Revolution. Freedom is defined as:

"Liberty is the right to do anything that is harmless to others. ”

- Article 4 of the Declaration of the Rights of Man, the programmatic document of the French Revolution (excerpt). Absolute freedom in 1789 could theoretically exist. However, since society is made up of people, freedom is not only a matter of the individual, but also the degree to which the various subjects in the society define each other. Therefore, some people think that the freedom of the individual is subject to the equal freedom of others, and then some people think that freedom is related to responsibility, and that the freedom that is related should be the responsibility that is related to it.

Freedom is a central concept in political philosophy. Freedom is also a social concept. Freedom is the right of the social person. The opposite of freedom is slavery.

Sun Yat-sen pointed out in many speeches that a person's freedom is true freedom only if it does not infringe on the freedom of others. If you violate the scope of others, you are not free.

During the Second World War, U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt proposed the famous "Four Freedoms": freedom of speech, freedom of belief, freedom from want, and freedom from fear.

The United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights reaffirms the spirit of these four freedoms.

In the second half of the 20th century, Isaiah Berlin began to use the concept of "two kinds of freedom" to divide freedom: "negative freedom" and "positive freedom."

He believes that positive freedom refers to the freedom of human beings in the sense of "initiative", that is, the decisions and choices made by human beings as subjects are based on their own active will rather than any external force.

When a person is autonomous or self-determined, he is in a state of "positive" freedom. This freedom is "the freedom to do."

Negative freedom, on the other hand, refers to freedom in the sense of "passivity". That is, people are not coerced by others in their will, and they are not interfered with by others in their actions, that is, they are in a state of "freedom from coercion and interference".

The word "freedom" in the modern sense was introduced from Japan, which for the first time used the word "freedom" in ancient Chinese texts to correspond to "Liberty" when translating foreign literature.

On the issue of translation controversy, Yan Fu also used the word "self-restraint" instead. In the end, however, it was the word "freedom" that was accepted by the people.

The idea of freedom is more popular in the world today. It has been argued that freedom is one of the greatest driving forces for human progress.

Freedom is the right to do anything that is harmless to others. The bottom line and principle of freedom is to protect the freedom of every individual.

Therefore, the property and human rights of citizens should not be violated and should be guaranteed by laws drafted to form a contract between peoples.

The right to march and assemble, the right to publish works, the right to know and supervise the press, and so on are basic human rights.

With regard to the relationship between the State and the individual, it is held that the rights of the human being are more precious and inalienable than the rights of the State, long before the emergence of the State.

No country has the right to restrict the happiness of its people and the right to pursue it. The idea of restricting the freedom of citizens comes from the inheritance of the old ideas such as the illegal "divine right of kings" and "the family of the world".

Because anything that does not infringe on the freedom of others should be free and lawful. This is the common modern concept that "human rights are above sovereignty".

It is also a reasonable premise for the existence of a country that the state should protect the human rights of the people and take it as its responsibility to build the people's happiness and protect human rights. Adhering to humanism and people-oriented has now become the most mainstream trend of thought in the world.

There is also an argument that the political groups of the bourgeoisie in the West, as well as the libertarians, agree that freedom is negative freedom.

They believe that positive freedom actually interferes with the negative freedom of others. Therefore, the bottom line and principle of freedom is to protect the negative freedom of each individual, rather than to promote positive freedom.

They protect citizens' property from private labor, and illegal property can be resolved by laws drafted by the common decision of the people. The human rights of citizens should be guaranteed against violation, and they advocate the human rights of political groups in the West, including fascists and Marxists, which are not considered to be conducive to the stability of Western societies, and the right to march and assemble should also be guaranteed.

The core idea of these people is that "human rights are higher than sovereignty", that is, "loving oneself is equivalent to loving the country", and they insist on humanism and people-oriented, which is now the mainstream trend of thought in the West.

Other opposition political groups in the West, such as contemporary Marxists, socialists, and Nazis, have criticized negative liberals for overemphasizing individual rights, ignoring social rights, and ignoring equality.

They are more inclined towards positive freedom, believing that the active intervention of society can achieve equality on a larger scale. In the process of intervention, the rights and interests of individuals are violated and their freedoms are obliterated.

Rights and freedoms were concentrated in the hands of the rulers. It is widely regarded as totalitarian. At the same time, these people have overemphasized the role of the so-called "leader" in the past, leading to a proliferation of personality cults, which are in essence a replica of the authority of the "emperor" of the old era.

In order to resist the concept of freedom, they absolutize the concept of freedom, believing that absolute freedom does not exist, so they deny the existence and meaning of freedom.

They proposed a philosophical definition of the "kingdom of freedom" as a kind of absolute freedom. In fact, there is no such thing as absolute freedom, there is relative freedom.

Freedom is premised on not infringing on the freedom of others, and it is restrictive and conditional. However, this restriction does not mean that the concept of freedom is meaningless, on the contrary, there is a vast world of freedom outside the limit. This is precisely what needs to be protected.

Absolutists, on the other hand, oppose individual freedom and the freedom of these worlds. For the freedom of the individual will inevitably disintegrate into the tyranny of the autocracy. So, in authoritarian countries, freedom is often not widely recognized, and its meaning is deliberately distorted. (To be continued......)